Toyota Recalls 228,000 Tacomas in U.S. Over Potential Rear-wheel Lockup

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Toyota of North America is recalling 228,000 Tacoma midsize pickups from the 2016 and 2017 model years. The affected vehicles may be leaking oil from their rear differentials. If left unchecked, the affected component could eventually seize — opening the driver up to a sudden flurry of new problems, like losing control of the vehicle moments before a horrific crash.

However, these leaks seem to cause only a gradual depletion of lubricant, giving owners plenty of time to enjoy some unpleasant warning noises as their truck’s differential slowly destroys itself.

While public complaints on the issue haven’t been overwhelming, checking in with enthusiast forum TacomaWorld led to a posting where owners reported an unpleasant howling noise coming from the rear of third-generation trucks. Several also admitted to having their differentials replaced prematurely after visiting service centers, with no information from Toyota as to why.

There is no guarantee the two issues are related, but the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recalls page includes complaints of a nearly identical nature. Some of those troubles were diagnosed as software glitches, while others resulted in the installation of new differentials. There are also numerous reports of the problem returning, even after repairs were made.

The issue seems to stem from a lapse in quality control. For the most part, Toyota hasn’t been replacing parts so much as it has been shoring them up — and the recall seems to offer the same solution.

In the recall notice, Toyota says “dealers will check the rear differential for any oil leakage. If no leaks are found, all fasteners will be re-tightened. If leakage is found, the rear differential carrier gasket will be replaced with a new one, and new fasteners will be installed. If rear differential components are damaged, the rear differential carrier assembly will be replaced with a new one.”

Obviously, this will be done at no cost to Tacoma owners — who Toyota says it will notify by mail beginning in the middle of June.

[Image: Toyota]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 28 comments
  • Funky Funky on Apr 30, 2017

    I'm not an expert. But I have to ask this question: Are they sure the root cause is with the differential? Perhaps something going on with the drive shaft is causing the symptoms (the symptoms being gasket and/or bolt/nut failures which are leading to leaks which are then causing potential damage to the differential). This might possibly explain why folks are reporting that the newly replaced differentials supposedly eventually again fail. Or, then again, maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree with the above notion (because I'm not an expert in this area). And, by-the-way, I personally plan to stick my head under my Tacoma tomorrow to check for signs of any leaks/seepage (although I'm not exactly sure what I'll be looking at...I'll just do the best I can to figure it out). I've been using the truck lately for long trips. I'd hate to run into any trouble.

  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on May 02, 2017

    A lapse in quality control is sure what I would call the latest edition of these trucks. Looking at several brand new 4 door TRD models with stickers crawling up to 39K revealed lots of cost cutting cheapness everywhere I looked. The door sheetmetal sounds like they went to the same paper thin sheet metal that encases a Yaris! The entire front grille assembly is very flimsy and is literally being held on by two pieces of small plastic so watch out for those low flying birds or you may need to replace your entire frontal grille assembly! The interior is also rubbish. Everywhere I touched felt cheap and flimsy and in fact the entire front dash bezel came right off in my hand with just a slight tug. The driver's seat has zero up and down adjustment and no power option and the driver's seat position was very lacking. Ironically right next door where Ford F-150's in various trims on sale for about the same price these Tacoma TRD's were stickering for. It doesn't take a rocket scientists to see why the F-150, Silverado and Ram continue to outsell these toy trucks, even when fuel prices are high. Surprise! Many of the F-150's were rated for the same combined mileage as the Tacoma, despite being much larger and having far more power in the 2.7 EB V6! They are also considerably better built both inside and out.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next