Volkswagen's Top Emissions Man Pleads 'Not Guilty' in Detroit Courtroom

by Steph Willems

Published: February 24th, 2017

volkswagen s top emissions man pleads not guilty in detroit courtroom

Based in Germany and nabbed by federal agents in Florida, Volkswagen’s one-time top emissions compliance manager for the U.S. made an appearance in a federal courtroom in Detroit today.

Indicted, along with five others, on charges of conspiring to defraud the U.S. and violating the Clean Air Act, Oliver Schmidt isn’t about to face down hard time without a fight. The executive pleaded not guilty to the charges, reports The Detroit News.

Before taking on a role that should have placed him safely out of reach of American authorities, Schmidt, 48, was general manager of Volkswagen’s Engineering and Environmental Office in Auburn Hills, Michigan. There, from 2012 to early 2015, he served as a liaison between VW and the Environmental Protection Agency and California Air Resources Board.

Those agencies ultimately blew the lid of the scandal, but by that time Schmidt was based out of VW headquarters in Wolfsburg, Germany. Out of reach, but not out of mind.

An opportunity arose in early January when Schmidt traveled to Cuba for a vacation. The return flight made a stopover in Miami, where FBI agents pounced. In its affidavit, the agency laid out Schmidt’s alleged involvement in a decade-long plan to deceive regulators, including his early knowledge (and denial of) the evidence EPA and CARB held against the company.

In a 2014 email to a colleague, which the FBI claims was written after West Virginia University researchers discovered the company’s soaring real-world diesel emissions, Schmidt stated, “It should first be decided whether we are honest.”

The former executive is facing up to 27 years for the various charges. His lawyer plans to seek bond, though Schmidt has in the past been considered a flight risk.

[Image: SalFalco/ Flickr ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

#Crime&Punishment #LawAndOrder #OliverSchmidt #VeDieselScandal #Volkswagen #VW

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

8 of 18 comments

Charliej on Feb 25, 2017

I am still waiting to see any GM executives indicted for actually killing over 125 of their customers. The US will act against foreign auto makers but turn a blind eye to wrongdoing by domestic manufacturers. I guess that foreign makers do not provide the correct level of bribes, I mean campaign contributions, as domestic companies.

Like Reply
- See 5 previous
- SCE to AUX on Feb 25, 2017
  
  We keep having the same conversation. GM's problem was due to incompetence; VW's was due to intentional deception. The law judges these situations much differently. The law places a lot of weight on intent, not just outcome. That's why there are degrees of homicide. That's why a drunk driver whose mistake killed someone might get out of jail long before a banker who bilked millions of dollars from his customers. There isn't a shred of evidence to indicate GM willfully killed its customers. The financial settlements are a way of them saying "we're sorry this preventable tragedy happened", not "we decided to kill your loved one but got caught; here's a check". And, this has nothing to do with foreign or domestic mfrs. Even GM's greatest detractors can see these distinctions; why can't you?
  
  Like
- Ronnie Schreiber on Feb 25, 2017
  
  @SCE to AUX From a consumer standpoint, the GM ignition switch issue is troubling because of a breakdown in quality control and other processes (like not changing the part number). VW, on the other hand, planned to cheat from the get go. One case may be negligence, but there doesn't appear to be criminal intent. The other case, well, there's a reason why Mr. Schmidt was at the Federal courthouse.
  
  Like
- OldManPants on Feb 25, 2017
  
  @SCE to AUX "Even GM’s greatest detractors can see these distinctions; why can’t you?" Charlie effed-up in America, had to skeedaddle to Mayhico, and it's America's fault.
  
  Like
- Robert.Walter on Feb 25, 2017
  
  1. GM was guilty of negligence and incompetence. There was no willful criminal activity. 2. VW’s crime was premeditated and its consequences were understood from Day One. 3. GM’s ignition switches weren’t identified as the root cause of the crashes and deaths for quite a long time, because it is exceptionally difficult to do so. Approximately 18 people die daily in GM cars. Over the course of 10 years, that works out to over 65000 deaths in GM cars. How were they to know that 0.2% of them were attributable to faulty ignition switches? It’s not like GM has operators standing by to evaluate every death in their vehicles, particularly when other factors like poor maintenance, speed, alcohol, and weather are involved. There is no moral or legal equivalence between these two cases.
  
  Like
- SELECTIVE_KNOWLEDGE_MAN on Feb 27, 2017
  
  @SCE to AUX He is a troll. He keeps repeating the same line in all TDI topics (google his username and ttac for a full list) and people keep replying with the same rebutals. He will never read your posts and he will repeat the statement in the next TDI topic.
  
  Like
- JimZ on Mar 01, 2017
  
  @Robert.Walter and people keep forgetting that the two scandals are under the jurisdiction of two different agencies. GM's ignition switch problem was NHTSA's reign, VW's emissions cheating was under the EPA. these agencies have completely different enforcement methods and ways to assess penalties. So b!tching about what happened to one company vs. the other is to display a fairly broad lack of knowledge about a lot of things. of course, when you ask one of these "there's so much over-regulation!" people what regulations they think are too much, they never really have a reasonable answer.
  
  Like
Dr. Claw on Mar 01, 2017

Meh. At the rate things are going, The Clean Air Act might not even exist in this country anymore.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Tassos Isn't this just a Golf Wagon with better styling and interior?I still cannot get used to the fact how worthless the $ has become compared to even 8 years ago, when I was able to buy far superior and more powerful cars than this little POS for.... 1/3rd less, both from a dealer, as good as new, and with free warranties. Oh, and they were not 15 year olds like this geezer, but 8 and 9 year olds instead.
ToolGuy Will it work in a Tesla?
ToolGuy No hybrid? No EV? What year is this? lolI kid -- of course there is an electric version.
Tassos No, this is for sure NOT my favorite Caddy. Very few Caddys with big fins work out as designs.FOr interiors, I much prefer the Caddys and other US luxury cars from the 30s, Packards etc. After the war, they ditched the generous wood veneer (without which no proper luxury car) for either nothing or the worse than nothing fake wood.For exterior, I like many Caddys from the 60s and early 70s, when the fins slowly diminished and finally disappearedEven the current " Art and Science" angular styling is quite good and has lasted a quarter century (from the first CTS). They even look better than most Bangled BMWs and even some Mercs.- from outside only.
ToolGuy Good for them.