I'm (Not) Your Man: Carlos Ghosn Steps Down as Nissan CEO, Plans to Focus on Alliance

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Carlos Ghosn, the aggressive figurehead who brought a nosediving Nissan back from the brink, is stepping down as CEO after 16 years on the job.

The industry titan will remain CEO of Renault, where he staged a similar turnaround, and will continue to serve as chairman of Nissan, Renault and lowly Mitsubishi — the latter company being added to the alliance last year. Apparently, the decision to step down was prompted by Mitsubishi’s deeply-ingrained woes. In order to work some Nissan-style magic on the struggling automaker, Ghosn needed to hand over the reins.

Meanwhile, a man who stuck with Nissan for 40 years has seen his loyalty pay off.

Ghosn named Hiroto Saikawa as his co-CEO in October. Now, the 63-year-old veteran — who was elevated to the role of chief competitive officer in 2013 — has his hand on the tiller of the company. Saikawa apparently has the same shrewd, budget-minded outlook as Ghosn, though the speed of his elevation surprised some industry observers.

“The timing is a bit surprising,” Takeshi Miyao, Asia managing director at consultancy Carnorama, told Reuters. “It appears Ghosn has decided very quickly that Saikawa is the right person to lead the company.”

Ghosn says that’s anything but the case. The departing CEO claims he’s known for a while who’s the right person for the job.

“There’s a moment when you have to pass the baton to someone else,” Ghosn told Bloomberg. “I’ve always said I would love to have a Japanese to be my successor and Saikawa-san is somebody I have been grooming for many years.”

Saikawa will take on the full responsibilities of his title come April 1.

With Nissan and Renault humming along in good shape, Ghosn will have his hands full dealing with Mitsubishi. The automaker, which handed over a 34-percent controlling stake to the alliance as a lifeline, suffered a disastrous fuel economy scandal in its home country last year. Mitsubishi revealed it had overstated gas mileage on a number of vehicles for years, forcing the resignation of president Tetsuro Aikawa. Its reputation — and its stock — plunged.

One of Ghosn’s first moves after adding the automaker to the alliance’s fold was to send Nissan’s trusted research and development head, Mitsuhiko Yamashita, to serve as Mitsubishi’s tech chief.

Rebuilding consumer confidence isn’t something that happens overnight, nor is the tedious process of developing new models based on modern architecture. Mitsubishi’s American sales base, which all but disappeared after the recession, needs rebuilding. Still, Ghosn claims “massive” changes are on the way.

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • Sector 5 Sector 5 on Feb 23, 2017

    I wonder if Ghosn is trying to dodge the Trump bullet on Nissan NA's Mexican production?

  • DrGastro997 DrGastro997 on Feb 23, 2017

    It's about time! He did nothing but cause internal conflict between the Japanese, French and Portuguese corporate divisions. Quality has worsened with a sinking model lineup. Hopefully Saikawa-san will bring back Nissan to being a Japanese tuned manufacturer.

    • Eyeflyistheeye Eyeflyistheeye on Feb 23, 2017

      It's because of him Nissan still exists as a car manufacturer, you ingrate. And what's with the JDM worship? Reminds me of car forums back in 2002.

  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
  • Crown No surprise there. The toxic chemical stew of outgassing.
Next