Trump Proposes 20-percent Tax on Mexican Goods to Pay for Wall; Other Countries Could Take a Hit

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Consumer products and vehicles produced outside of the U.S. could see a big hike in sticker price if the Trump administration goes ahead with a proposed plan to tax Mexican goods — and eventually all foreign goods — to the tune of 20 percent.

The White House said today the measure is being looked at as part of a wide-ranging tax overhaul package under consideration by Congress. The announcement came after an anticipated visit by Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto went south.

The meeting between Trump and Nieto, scheduled for next week, fell apart today, with the Mexican leader taking to Twitter to announce the update. Of course, Nieto’s tweet came after one fired off by Trump, where he said the meeting should probably not go ahead if Mexico isn’t willing to pay for the administration’s proposed border wall.

Earlier this week, Trump pulled the U.S. out of the fledgling Trans-Pacific Partnership and announced his intention to renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement. The president has clearly expressed his desire to reach bilateral deals with individual nations. Mexico sends 80 percent of its goods to the U.S.

“I’ve said many times that the American people will not pay for the wall,” Trump said after the visit’s cancellation. “Unless Mexico is going to treat the United States fairly, with respect, such a meeting would be fruitless and I want to go a different route.”

Yesterday, Trump signed an executive order to begin construction of the wall — a key election plank proposed as a method of stemming illegal immigration. Nieto tweeted that his country is still hoping to reach a trade agreements “that favor both nations.”

White House spokesman Sean Spicer said the import tax is one of a range of options for paying for the wall, and it could eventually be applied to other nations. He added the tax could be targeted at specific industries.

Even if the 20-percent import tax was only applied to Mexican-made goods, it would still cause a shakeup in automakers’ production plans. Car manufacturers, both domestic and foreign, move production of low-profit vehicles south of the border to avoid the expense of opening costly assembly American plants to serve the U.S. market. Earlier this week, Trump proposed decreasing corporate tax rates to between 15 and 20 percent.

While Mexico and other countries stare down the barrel of a serious economic disruption, Canada, on the other hand, could make out like a bandit — assuming that country’s free-trade agreement with the U.S. stays intact.

After Trump pledged to reopen NAFTA, the head of his business advisory panel said that Canada shouldn’t worry about collateral damage.

“Canada is very well-positioned for any discussions with the United States,” said Stephen Schwarzman, adding that the U.S. holds its northern neighbor in “very high regard.” Canada sends 75 percent of its goods to the U.S., including vehicles produced by the Detroit Three, Honda and Toyota.

[Source: Reuters, Business Insider]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 423 comments
  • TOTitan TOTitan on Jan 27, 2017

    CallMeDick Trump just makes up shit as he goes along and and expects people to believe him. Apparently you are one of them

  • Vvk Vvk on Jan 27, 2017

    I used to buy MANN filters for most of my cars. A couple of year ago I installed a MANN air filter in my car and was very surprised to see that it did not fit quite right. Checking it over, I was further surprised that the filter was no longer Made in Germany. It was now Made in Mexico. What do I care where it is made, as long as it is made well, right? Being Made in Mexico did not make the price go down, by the way, not one penny. Well, I thought, it is still MANN, one crooked filter does not mean anything. Next time my Made in Mexico air filter did not fit right again. This time I was furious. I no longer buy MANN filters. Hengst filters I now buy are perfectly made and don't cost more than MANN filters. Made in Germany/Austria... I hope they do impose the 20% tax so that MANN filters come from Germany again.

  • 28-Cars-Later “1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries....It would be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the consequences”― Theodore J. Kaczynski, Ph.D., Industrial Society and Its Future, 1995.
  • FreedMike "Automotive connectivity has clearly been a net negative for the end user..."Really? Here's a list of all the net negatives for me:1) Instead of lugging around a road atlas or smaller maps that do nothing but distract me from driving, and don't tell me where to go once I've reached Point B, I can now just ask my car's navigation system to navigate me there. It'll even tell me how long it will take given current traffic conditions. 2) Instead of lugging around a box of a dozen or so cassette tapes that do nothing but distract me from driving, I can now just punch up a virtually endless library of music, podcasts, or audiobooks on the screen, push a button, and play them. 3) I can tell my car, "call (insert name here)" and the call is made without taking my hands off the wheel.4) I can tell my car, "text (insert name here)" and the system takes my dictation, sends me the text, and reads off any replies. 5) I can order up food on my screen, show up at the restaurant, and they'll have it waiting for me. 6) I can pull up a weather map that allows me to see things like hailstorms in my path. 7) If I'm in trouble, I can push a "SOS" button and help will be sent. 8) Using my phone, I can locate my car on a map and navigate to it on foot, and tell it to turn on the heat, A/C, or defrosters.None of these are benefits? Sorry, not sorry...I like them all. Why wouldn't I? Consumers clearly also like this stuff, and if they didn't, none of it would be included in cars. Now, maybe Matt doesn't find these to be beneficial. Fair enough! But he should not declare these things as a "net negative" for the rest of us. That's presumption. So...given all that, what's the answer here? Matt seems to think the answer is to "unplug" and go back to paper maps, boxes of music, and all that. Again, if that's Matt's bag, then fair enough. I mean, I've been there, and honestly, I don't want to go back, but if that's his bag, then go with God, I guess. But this isn't the solution for everyone, and saying otherwise is presumption. Here's a solution that DOES work for everyone: instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, clean the bathwater. You do that very, very simply: require clear, easy-to-understand disclosure of data sharing that happens as the result of all these connected services, and an equally clear, easy-to-understand method for opting out of said data sharing. That works better than turning the clock back to those thrilling days of 1990 when you had to refer to handwritten notes to get you to your date's house, or ripping SIM cards out of your car.
  • Funky D What is the over-under for number of recalls in the first 5 years of ownership?
  • Normie Dayyum! Great White Woman!The car, I mean. I could feel kinda safe in it.
  • Slavuta "The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. " --- 1984
Next