VW Pauses ID. Buzz Van Production Because People Aren't Buying Them

Michael Accardi
by Michael Accardi

Volkswagen’s retro-inspired ID. Buzz was supposed to rekindle the free-spirited appeal of the original Microbus while headlining the company’s electric future.


According to reports from Automotive News Europe and Germany’s DPA news agency, Volkswagen will suspend production of both the ID. Buzz and its Multivan sibling at its Hanover, Germany, factory from October 20 to 24, the pause coincides with the autumn holidays in Lower Saxony.


Volkswagen says the decision is a way to “adapt production processes to changed market conditions.” In other words, people don't want it, and those who do, already bought one. Volkswagen has already taken measures to address the weak demand, including extending its summer shutdown by an extra week and reverting to a 35-hour work week in September.

When the ID. Buzz debuted, Volkswagen projected annual capacity of 130,000 units at the Hanover facility—those projections are pure ambition, year-to-date VW has only moved 42,900 vans, including those sold for commercial purposes. The plant, which builds both the electric ID. Buzz and the combustion-powered Multivan will produce roughly 21,000 fewer vehicles this year than originally planned, according to internal figures cited by Hannoversche Allgemeine Zeitung


The ID. Buzz’s pricing has not helped its case. In the U.S., the van starts north of $60,000 and climbs well above $70,000 in higher trims—which brings many other premium electric SUVs into play, most of which offer better range and higher performance. The model’s U.S. debut in late 2024 was also mugged by a recall and stop sale order due to third-row seats that failed to meet federal safety standards.

Despite the van's charm, spacious interior, and easygoing road manners, the ID. Buzz offers one of the shortest driving ranges among modern EVs—some 230-ish miles—severely limiting its use case as a family hauler or commercial vehicle. Volkswagen says it will increase marketing support and introduce new incentives—demonstrating that it either firmly does not understand why people aren't buying it, or those are really the only levers it has to pull.


[Images: Volkswagen]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Michael Accardi
Michael Accardi

An experienced automotive storyteller known for engaging and insightful content. Michael also brings a wealth of technical knowledge and experience having been part of the Ford GT program at Multimatic and built cars that raced in TCR, IMSA, and IndyCar.

More by Michael Accardi

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 56 comments
  • Bkojote Bkojote on Oct 22, 2025

    "They should put an ICE in it"


    Ah yes, what VW's $70,000 van needs is their garbage EA888, complete with turbo wastegate failures every 20k miles, brittle plastic timing chain guides, cooling system failure, manifold failure, camshaft failure, and carbon buildup.


    VW has no future with internal combustion engines. Every gas and diesel engine they've made for the past 35 years is total garbage.


    Fire the German engineers behind the drivetrain and interior interface, put the Rivian-derived Scout drivetrain in it, bin CARIAD and put in the Rivian system, cut the price by $20k.

    • See 1 previous
    • EBFlexing on ur mom EBFlexing on ur mom on Oct 24, 2025

      "Ah yes, what VW's $70,000 van needs is their garbage EA888, complete with turbo wastegate failures every 20k miles, brittle plastic timing chain guides, cooling system failure, manifold failure, camshaft failure, and carbon buildup."

      Are you ok?


  • Lemmiwinks Lemmiwinks on Oct 23, 2025

    This is quite simple: It's $70K for a vehicle that's admittedly neat-looking, but also doesn't look, feel, or justify price north of $10K over its traditional minivan competition.

  • SCE to AUX A lot has changed since I got my license in 1979, about 2 weeks after I turned 16 (on my second attempt). I would have benefited from formal driver training, and waiting another year to get my license. I was a road terror for several years - lots of accidents, near misses, speeding, showing off - the epitome of youthful indiscretion.
  • Lou_BC Jellybean F150 (1997-2004). People tend to prefer the more square body and blunt grill style.
  • SCE to AUX My first car was a 71 Pinto, 1.6 Kent engine, 4 spd. It was the original Base model with a trunk, #4332 ever built. I paid $125 for it in 1980, and had it a year. It remains the quietest idling engine I've ever had. 75HP, and I think the compression ratio was 8:1. It was riddled with rust, and I sold it to a classmate who took it to North Carolina.After a year with a 74 Fiat, I got a 76 Pinto, 2.3 engine, 4-spd. The engine was tractor rough, but I had the car 5 years with lots of rebuilding. It's the only car I parted with by driving into a junkyard.Finally, we got an 80 Bobcat for $1 from a friend in 1987. What a piece of junk. Besides the rust, it never ran right despite tons of work, fuel economy was terrible, the automatic killed the power. The hatch always leaked, and the vinyl seats were brutal in winter and summer.These cars were terrible by today's standards, but they never left me stranded. All were fitted with the poly blast shield, and I never worried about blowing up.The miserable Bobcat was traded for an 82 LTD, which was my last Ford when it was traded in 1996. Seeing how Ford is doing today, I won't be going back.
  • Jeff S I rented a PT Cruiser for a week and although I would not have bought one it was not as bad as I thought it would be. Pontiac Aztek was a good vehicle but ugly. Pinto for its time was not as good as the Japanese cars but it was not the worst that honor would go to the Vega. If one bought a Pinto new it was much better with a 4 speed manual with no air it didn't have the power for those. Add air and an automatic to a Pinto and you could beat it on a bicycle. The few small cars available today or in the recent past are so much better than the Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin. A Mitsubishi Mirage, Nissan Versa, and the former Chevy Spark are light years ahead of those small cars of the 70s.
  • JRED My dad has a 2005 F-150 with the dreaded 5.4 that he bought new. 320k miles on the original engine and trans and it's still not only driving, but driving well. He's just done basic maint, including spark plugs and ignition modules. Interior is pretty ratty now but who cares? Outlier I know, but that is a good truck.
Next