ICYMI: The Nissan Quest Still Exists - Company Confirms 2017 Model

by Timothy Cain

Published: December 6th, 2016

icymi the nissan quest still exists company confirms 2017 model

You can still buy a brand new Nissan Quest.

In fact, you’ll be able to do so in 2017, as well.

To be honest, we had our doubts about the Quest’s U.S. future. Nissan Canada killed the Quest in 2013. Fast forward three years, and Nissan USA’s lingering Quest suffered a massive 73-percent year-over-year sales decline between August and November of this year. During that period, only 0.5 percent of American minivan buyers, just one out of every 200, opted for a Nissan Quest.

With sales poor and inventory falling below 300 units nationwide, we became suspicious. Long after Nissan began featuring 2017 examples of the company’s current fleet on both its media and consumer websites, the Quest still only existed as a 2016 example. Time and again we made inquiries with Nissan. Time and again, Nissan responded with an absence of hard information.

This morning, however, was different. Our latest query, “Can we assume it’s dead, or is this just an extended hiatus before a 2017 Quest arrives?”, was met with a no.

“There will be a 2017 Quest,” Dan Passe, senior manager for Nissan product communications, told TTAC today. There’s no word yet on the exact timing of the on-sale date or any trim changes, or if the Quest will still fail miserably in the IIHS’s small overlap test.

But even with mere crumbs provided by Nissan so far, this is like the thrilling culmination to a 60 Minutes investigative report. PBS Frontline would have killed for this story. Ken Burns will someday film an historical montage revealing the inner secrets of TTAC’s quest to discover — or not discover, perish the thought — the long-awaited 2017 Quest.

We began pursuing the possible end-of-Quest-production story at the end of October. It is now the beginning of December. That’s the kind of sticktuitiveness, the dogged determination and fervent focus, that brings you back to TTAC day after day.

Okay, so it’s not The Next GT-R. For goodness’ sake, it’s not even a re-engineered Altima.

It’s a Nissan Quest: the most forgotten, ignored, and rejected minivan in America.

But with every indicator pointing the other direction, you heard it here — first, we think — that Nissan USA will import the fourth-generation Quest for a seventh model year.

The 2017 Nissan Quest lives.

Alas, it appears as though there will be no Mercury Villager twin.

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

#2017NissanQuest #Minivans #Nissan #ProductPlanning

Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 26 comments

NN on Dec 08, 2016

I have a 2013 Quest LE (same model as this 2017). We purchased it before the crash tests came out. It is an exceptional family vehicle that we really like, and is very comfortable. We are a fan of the unique JDM qualities (better quality interior, super soft ride, cameras everywhere, power everything, unique styling). It's pushing 70k miles at this point. We average 21mpg regularly in mostly suburban driving. The Nissan dealer does charge a lot for maintenance. We've had to do new brakes ($500), tires ($900), CVT fluid change ($300) and a new battery ($220) outside of standard oil changes/rotations. The large LCD navigation screen sometimes goes haywire (but resets on every start up), otherwise the vehicle has been fine. Overall we do like it, however in general if anyone else asked my opinion on minivans (and they do), I typically tell them buy a Toyota Sienna. Unless you know/care what JDM means and owning something a bit unique, a Sienna will do everything equally good or better and probably have better long term quality and resale value. If Nissan consistently priced this $5k below a Sienna, it might be worth it and sales would rise, especially once the Caravan goes and there's no large value option left. With a strong dollar and long paid off tooling, they could probably afford to do so.

Like Reply
CaseyLE82 on Apr 25, 2017

I have been driving a 1991 Toyota Previa for many years. Up until about 2 weeks ago it was NOT my daily driver, but my husband's daily driver's AC quit, so I gave him my Kia Forte and I'm back in the Previa. I love the Previa and it's always been our favorite road trip car. I will say, however, at 335,000 miles it's starting to feel a little long in the tooth. I'm STILL trying to decide what to replace it with. I must have a minivan, they are just too practical for words, so I'm deciding between a good late model Chevrolet Astro (a 2002 or more with less than 70,000 miles I can pick up for around $9k). OR, a 2013 or 2014 Nissan Quest. I want something UNIQUE, with captains chairs in the second row, just like my previa.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

EBFlex Garbage but for less!
FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.