By on September 21, 2016

2014 Volkswagen Passat TDI-011

It’s not the podium an automaker wants to find itself on top of.

After marking the first anniversary of its emissions debacle, former “clean diesel” builder Volkswagen finds itself staring down the barrel of $9.15 billion in investor lawsuits, the Wall Street Journal reports.

When it comes to being sued by investors, no German company can match Volkswagen’s performance.

In total, the Braunschweig district court in Germany (which handles all suits against the automaker) has logged 1,400 claims from investors seeking damages. In the days after the Environmental Protection Agency’s public charges against Volkswagen, the automaker’s share price nose-dived, erasing a third of its value.

Almost immediately, investors cried that the automaker didn’t provide a warning of the impending stock slide.

Now, a very diverse and angry group has come calling for its pound of diesel-soaked flesh. Reportedly, the number of claims is equal to half a year’s worth of civil claims at the German court. The court has even purchased new warehouses to house all the paperwork.

Among the litigants are U.S. pension funds, who once saw Volkswagen’s stock as a stable place to invest. Bloomberg reports the U.S. government is another claimant, which hopes to recover $33.5 million.

To recoup their losses, investors will need to prove that Volkswagen knew about the looming scandal and acted intentionally to keep investors in the dark.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

5 Comments on “Volkswagen Sets a New German Record (for Investor Lawsuits)...”


  • avatar

    The more lawsuits, the bigger VW’s exposure… the lower its market value. Which is not in the interest of major shareholders. Ah, capitalism at its ‘finest’. “We’re all in it for the money.” Heard that Audi’s fresh new head of development Knirsch has to clear his desk, since he’s suspected of being involved with Dieselgate too.

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    “…investors cried that the automaker didn’t provide a warning of the impending stock slide.”

    I don’t know how they could have provided a warning.

    The complaint should be centered around the lost value, not the lack of warning.

    • 0 avatar
      notwhoithink

      “I don’t know how they could have provided a warning.”

      If they knew about something that could materially affect their stock price, particularly regulatory activity, then they are required to report it. Not reporting it or (even worse) deliberately concealing it is a violation and opens you up to shareholder lawsuits. The claim is that VW execs knew about the problem long before it was announced on Sept 18, 2015, and should have warned shareholders. They had been having conversations with the US regulators for over a year before the news became public, and as we’ve seen the existence of the defeat device was relatively common knowledge within the company for many years.

      They certainly seem to have a valid claim, though it remains to be seen if shareholders’ attorneys can make it stick.

      • 0 avatar
        05lgt

        Who do they get money from? The executives? This seems a little like trying to get a spot in line with all the other damaged parties, even though the investors are the owners of the damager. Isn’t shareholder value the source of money to PAY the damages? Can you really sue yourself to get a portion of a sinking ship?

        • 0 avatar
          tedward

          There’s still income, credit lines and cash on hand, especially in the manufacturing sector. Think of it as the year with the giant dividend from an investor’s point of view. I have no idea how this being a German company would affect things.

          It seems like almost any corporate scandal or earnings forecast not met is accompanied by investor claims. But hey, not a lawyer.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lie2me: A joint meeting like that would really stir the pot, but how else would you weed out the problems?
  • speedlaw: My C43 would 100% have been a wagon if mb usa sold them here…between skiing, sports and life it is a...
  • MBella: Volvo was also a complete brand when they were purchased, with product. GM kept all the rights to the new...
  • thornmark: someone bought an Encore AND a Verano how dumb is that? doubling down on stupid once GM fails in China...
  • MBella: This looks foolish. They will be entirely dependant on the US truck and SUV market, along with Buick sales in...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Timothy Cain
  • Matthew Guy
  • Ronnie Schreiber
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Chris Tonn
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth