GM to Appeals Court: Respect Our Bankruptcy!

gm to appeals court respect our bankruptcy

General Motors hopes to avoid paying up to $10 billion in liabilities by challenging last month’s appeals court ruling in the faulty ignition switch saga.

The automaker wants a rehearing after the court ruled that it couldn’t use its 2009 bankruptcy to block hundreds of crash-related lawsuits, according to the Wall Street Journal.

In July, the U.S. Appeals Court of Manhattan overruled an earlier court decision that protected GM from financial damage from ignition switch-related accidents that took place before 2009. The automaker has already paid out $2 billion in settlements related to the faulty switches, which are linked to 124 deaths. It wants a panel of appeals court judges to decide the matter, and hopefully rule in its favor.

According to GM, last month’s ruling “makes no sense and is flatly contrary to the bankruptcy code and decisions from other courts.” If the decision isn’t overturned, it could damage the entire bankruptcy process, the automaker claimed.

Steve Berman, a plaintiffs’ lawyer, told the WSJ that he “isn’t too worried.” The court’s decision was unanimous, he noted, and it rarely grants requests for a rehearing.

The appeals court claimed GM knew about issues with the ignition switches at the time of bankruptcy, but it waited until early 2014 to make the defect public. That violated the due process rights of its consumers, the court ruled.

Laws are laws, GM asserts. By transitioning into a wholly new corporate entity after the bankruptcy, it washed its hands of the sins of “Old GM.” The automaker said the ruling, as it stands, puts all companies who purchase bankruptcy sale assets in danger.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 40 comments
  • KevinB Because they sell every EV they make, and most of the time you need to be on a list to get one. That's why the cost of them isn't going down.
  • Oberkanone Cost of EV's will continue to increase as demand for materials to manufacture batteries increases. Owning a personal vehicle will only be attainable to the wealthy.
  • Kcflyer I think it's ugly. Unless they lengthened the cab the back row is still useless for me anyway. Price is proof that I may have purchased my last new vehicle
  • Ltcmgm78 I must laugh because this is an expansion of the old question of why car manufacturers don't build less expensive cars. There's no money in it! As long as virtue signalers have the long green to buy the pricier EVs, there won't be any affordable ones until most of the demand for the expensive ones are met. Economics, you know. New technologies always progress this way. The future Chevy Vega on the Ultium platform is a long way off.
  • Daniel J Also, the additional 20K is spread out over a loan, which could end up closer to 24K.
Next