SPIED: 2018 Ford Fiesta, Making a Move Upmarket

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

An updated version of Ford’s tiniest offering was just spotted on the road, and while the camo is strong with this one, it’s clear the subcompact Fiesta now sports higher-end clothes.

Expected to bow in mid-2017 as a 2018 model, the Fiesta (the unofficial car of TTAC) keeps its old platform, but makes big changes in design and, apparently, price.

No longer resembling a strawberry (or raindrop, take your pick), the upcoming Fiesta gains a mildly squared-off front and back end, and should get an updated version of the corporate grille.

By sticking with the old architecture for a seventh generation, Ford plans to pump the cash it saved into improved interior finishes and content. Expect soft-touch materials and an upgraded infotainment system, along with a larger touchscreen and SYNC3 interface. A host of safety aids, including lane departure warnings, blind spot monitoring and road sign recognition, should be available.

With all this new content, there’s good reason to believe Ford will drop the lowest trim lines from the Fiesta stable. Say goodbye to the Studio and Style trim lines, and say hello to a starting price in the $18,000 range.

No one wants to build small cars in the U.S., and Ford is no different — the next Fiesta rolls out of the company’s new assembly plant in Rayong, Thailand. Current models are sourced from Ford plants in Mexico and India.




[Images: @ 2016 Spiedbilde/The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 40 comments
  • GeneralMalaise GeneralMalaise on Jun 07, 2016

    One of the worst reliability records of any car on the market.

  • Bullnuke Bullnuke on Jun 08, 2016

    Fiesta's aren't bad for what they are, specifically the "S" trim models. An inexpensive vehicle, cheap to run and own without much else. In comparison with similar class vehicles of yore such as the Beetle, Fiesta's are far and above better cars. My daughter bought an "S" sedan new in '14 for right around $13.5k out the door and is very pleased with it (other than the engine power). Being my child she chose one with a 5MT so no PowerSh*t issues and commutes with it daily on a 60-mile state highway run. She looked at the Focus before her purchase and liked the Fiesta better as it seemed pretty much 90% of a Focus at a much lower price. As for reliability, the passenger side door speaker blew out (she likes her music) and she went to aftermarket for a new set of front speakers. That has been the only issue in around 28k miles. As an aside, our local dealer has hired an extra full time transmission man to service PowerShift transmissions - there are usually 3 or 4 Fiesta's/Focus's daily awaiting his attention.

    • HotPotato HotPotato on Jun 09, 2016

      The fleet at my work has become an all-Ford affair, and it seems immune from these PowerSchlub issues. Other than jerkiness in reverse, the DCTs are indistinguishable from conventional automatics in our Foci. And in the Fiesta, where the DCT seems tuned for quicker, firmer shifts, it actually makes the hamster-wheel 1.6 enjoyable. Overall I prefer the PowerSchleps to the lazy conventional auto that fizzles the fun in our Fusions (which are otherwise a stellar drive). Then again, maybe we just haven't put enough miles on them. Our reservation computer is programmed to check out the oldest cars first, to push them over the replacement mileage expeditiously, so the awful box-shaped Malibus and floaty chop-top Stratuses have only recently disappeared.

  • Brandon I would vote for my 23 Escape ST-Line with the 2.0L turbo and a normal 8 speed transmission instead of CVT. 250 HP, I average 28 MPG and get much higher on trips and get a nice 13" sync4 touchscreen. It leaves these 2 in my dust literally
  • JLGOLDEN When this and Hornet were revealed, I expected BOTH to quickly become best-sellers for their brands. They look great, and seem like interesting and fun alternatives in a crowded market. Alas, ambitious pricing is a bridge too far...
  • Zerofoo Modifications are funny things. I like the smoked side marker look - however having seen too many cars with butchered wire harnesses, I don't buy cars with ANY modifications. Pro-tip - put the car back to stock before you try and sell it.
  • JLGOLDEN I disagree with the author's comment on the current Murano's "annoying CVT". Murano's CVT does not fake shifts like some CVTs attempt, therefore does not cause shift shock or driveline harshness while fumbling between set ratios. Murano's CVT feels genuinely smooth and lets the (great-sounding V6) engine sing and zing along pleasantly.
  • JLGOLDEN Our family bought a 2012 Murano AWD new, and enjoyed it for 280K before we sold it last month. CVT began slipping at 230K but it was worth fixing a clean, well-cared for car. As soon as we sold the 2012, I grabbed a new 2024 Murano before the body style and powertrain changes for 2025, and (as rumored) goes to 4-cyl turbo. Sure, the current Murano feels old-school, with interior switchgear and finishes akin to a 2010 Infiniti. That's not a bad thing! Feels solid, V6 sounds awesome, and the whole platform has been around long enough that future parts & service wont be an issue.
Next