Report: More Millennials Living With Parents Than Any Other Living Arrangement

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

The nonpartisan Pew Research Center recently published the starkest evidence yet of the issues facing millennials versus those that faced boomers during the same periods of their lives.

Millennials, who are now between 18 and 34 according to the study, are more likely to live at home than any other type of living arrangement due to changing social attitudes and the economy.

The analysis uses data from 2014, which shows more millennials living at home with parents (32.1 percent) than with a spouse or roommate (31.6 percent), alone (14 percent), or in another arrangement (22 percent). It’s the first time those living at home have outnumbered those in any other living arrangement in over 130 years, and is a stark contrast to boomers who were only 20-percent likely to live at home with their parents versus 62-percent likely to live with a spouse in 1960.

Pew states the main reason for the shift is a changing attitude toward marriage amongst those in the 18-34 age group, but other factors affect the shift as well.

From Pew:

In addition, trends in both employment status and wages have likely contributed to the growing share of young adults who are living in the home of their parent(s), and this is especially true of young men. Employed young men are much less likely to live at home than young men without a job, and employment among young men has fallen significantly in recent decades. The share of young men with jobs peaked around 1960 at 84%. In 2014, only 71% of 18- to 34-year-old men were employed. Similarly with earnings, young men’s wages (after adjusting for inflation) have been on a downward trajectory since 1970 and fell significantly from 2000 to 2010. As wages have fallen, the share of young men living in the home of their parent(s) has risen.

Economic factors seem to explain less of why young adult women are increasingly likely to live at home. Generally, young women have had growing success in the paid labor market since 1960 and hence might increasingly be expected to be able to afford to live independently of their parents. For women, delayed marriage—which is related, in part, to labor market outcomes for men—may explain more of the increase in their living in the family home.

The Great Recession (and modest recovery) has also been associated with an increase in young adults living at home. Initially in the wake of the recession, college enrollments expanded, boosting the ranks of young adults living at home. And given the weak job opportunities facing young adults, living at home was part of the private safety net helping young adults to weather the economic storm.

The Pew study doesn’t talk about car sales at all, but one can draw some similarities between home and car ownership for the defined group.

In short, millennials — and especially males — have it worse off than their parents in the job market, which contributes to their likeliness of staying at home or boomeranging back to live with parents.

[Photo credit: Optician Training]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 185 comments
  • AJ AJ on Jun 02, 2016

    I'm in the Gen X crowd and I left home when I was 17. I'd SHOOT myself before I'd ever move back in with my parents. In fact I currently supplement my mother's income to keep her from moving in with me.

  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Jun 09, 2016

    Wish I had not been on vacation week when this article was new.

    • See 4 previous
    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Jun 09, 2016

      @highdesertcat Pay them no mind. It's just envy. I say, good on you! That's what I told my kids and grand kids when they left home. Play your cards right, and the world will be your oyster. From a personal perspective: It was hard enough to house, feed and provide for me and mine during my working life. So why would I give a flying fvck about housing, feeding or providing for someone else's crotch fruit? Each person has to carve out a niche for themselves. Those who can, DO! Those who can't...., teach. Or move back in with mom and dad.

  • MaintenanceCosts Poorly packaged, oddly proportioned small CUV with an unrefined hybrid powertrain and a luxury-market price? Who wouldn't want it?
  • MaintenanceCosts Who knows whether it rides or handles acceptably or whether it chews up a set of tires in 5000 miles, but we definitely know it has a "mature stance."Sounds like JUST the kind of previous owner you'd want…
  • 28-Cars-Later Nissan will be very fortunate to not be in the Japanese equivalent of Chapter 11 reorganization over the next 36 months, "getting rolling" is a luxury (also, I see what you did there).
  • MaintenanceCosts RAM! RAM! RAM! ...... the child in the crosswalk that you can't see over the hood of this factory-lifted beast.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Yes all the Older Land Cruiser’s and samurai’s have gone up here as well. I’ve taken both vehicle ps on some pretty rough roads exploring old mine shafts etc. I bought mine right before I deployed back in 08 and got it for $4000 and also bought another that is non running for parts, got a complete engine, drive train. The mice love it unfortunately.
Next