Ford F-150 SuperCab Earns 'Top Safety Pick' One Year After Crashgate, Wheel Blocks Competition

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

The folks in Dearborn are right chuffed about the F-150’s latest crash results — so much so that they sent out embargo materials to a number of outlets, including us (thank you!), to make sure we get the story straight.

According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the F-150 SuperCab — in addition to the SuperCrew tested last year — is now a Top Safety Pick, when equipped with optional forward collision alert. Ford is the only brand awarded as such in the segment.

The latest round of tests comes after Ford was caught with its pants down last year. Those tests found that not all F-150s were created equal when it came to withstanding the dreaded small overlap frontal crash test.

This year, it’s more of the same — but the trucks behaving badly aren’t Fords.

According to IIHS, the latest round of testing included extended and crew cab trucks. Of the seven trucks tested, only three trucks — Ford F-150 SuperCab, Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (GMC Sierra) Double Cab, and Toyota Tundra Double Cab — earned “acceptable” or higher ratings in the small overlap front crash test.

A-pillars started going pear-shaped when IIHS supersized the test subjects. Both the Silverado 1500 Crew Cab and Tundra Crew Max received “marginal” scores in the small overlap front crash test.

“Both models had considerable intrusion into the occupant compartment that compromised survival space for the driver,” IIHS stated in an embargoed release.

Ram, which introduced its 1500-series truck just before IIHS announced the small overlap front crash test, received a “poor” structure and “marginal” overall rating in the small overlap test, regardless of cab size.

“The force of the crash pushed the door-hinge pillar, instrument panel and steering column back toward the driver dummy. In the Ram Crew Cab test, the dummy’s head contacted the front airbag but rolled around the left side as the steering column moved to the right, allowing the head to approach the intruding windshield pillar,” the IIHS release stated.

All trucks tested — save the F-150 — were rated “poor” by IIHS for lower leg and foot protection in a small offset front crash.

To date, regular cab trucks remain uncrashed. However, Ford’s truck spokesperson Mike Levine explained that the automaker included similar countermeasures in regular cab versions of its 2016 F-150.

“It has wheel blockers, nylon hinge pillar reinforcement and rocker panel reinforcements,” said Levine in an email with TTAC. He later detailed, “There are slight differences but generally the same countermeasures are now across all cabs so we expect similar performance in small overlap testing for SuperCrew, SuperCab and Regular Cab.”

Toyota representative Nate Martinez stated his employer is looking at the test results as a learning opportunity.

“We are evaluating the test results with the goal of finding new ways to continuously improve the performance of Toyota trucks and to further enhance the safety of our vehicles,” Martinez said over email. “Importantly, the Toyota trucks tested continue to meet or exceed all federally required motor vehicle safety standards.”

And Ram says it meets federally mandated safety requirements as well.

“Every FCA US vehicle meets or exceeds all applicable federal motor-vehicle safety standards. However, we continually evaluate the performance of our vehicles,” explained Ram spokesperson Nick Cappa over email.

Considering Ram’s 1500-series truck is one of the oldest full-size trucks available, FCA could eschew further development of the current platform to focus on the next-generation pickup’s safety performance. The same train of thought can be applied to the even older second-generation Tundra, which Toyota debuted in 2007 and refreshed for the 2014 model year.

A representative for GM declined to comment on the results.

As for Ford, it can now unequivocally state it has the safest truck according to IIHS tests, and IIHS can claim it forced an OEM’s hand to build a safer truck. Everyone wins — except for those who bought regular and extended cab 2015 F-150s.

[Image: Ford; Video: IIHS]

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 88 comments
  • Celebrity208 Celebrity208 on Apr 12, 2016

    Warning, pure speculation follows: I suspect (from only looking at the pictures) that the intrusion that the IIHS noticed in the Ram and Chevy were the wheels distorting the footwell of the driver. Notice they stayed parallel to the direction of travel. On the Ford (and again as seen in the picture in this article) the wheel turned perpendicular to the direction of travel. Was this the differentiator between getting and not getting a "Top Pick" award the level of footwell intrusion? Was this intrusion caused by the wheel? Were the wheel sizes the same in all three vehicles? Did the Ford's wheel turn 90deg as a result of a crash specific suspension design or just happenstance? Personally, I treat the IIHS's tests as anecdotal evidence... not a deal breaker but something to at least be considered. It's not like they do a statistically significant number of crash tests. They do five different crash tests. I don't blame them though, considering the cost of these vehicles.

    • See 1 previous
    • JimZ JimZ on Apr 12, 2016

      "deflection" is as good crash protection as is absorption.

  • Shedkept Shedkept on Apr 15, 2016

    Went for a test drive in a new '16 F150XLT. Nice ride, quiet and very capable. It was a V8 because I still don't trust the EcoBoost 6's. Teething problems when they were new and the fact that 2 turbos adds more complications down the road. If you dump a vehicle when it reaches warranty it's probably a fine choice. The V8 sounds great and will actually get close to the claimed mileage. I've never met anyone who was happy with EcoBoost mileage.

  • Alan Years ago Jack Baruth held a "competition" for a piece from the B&B on the oddest pickup story (or something like that). I think 5 people were awarded the prizes.I never received mine, something about being in Australia. If TTAC is global how do you offer prizes to those overseas or are we omitted on the sly from competing?In the end I lost significant respect for Baruth.
  • Alan My view is there are good vehicles from most manufacturers that are worth looking at second hand.I can tell you I don't recommend anything from the Chrysler/Jeep/Fiat/etc gene pool. Toyotas are overly expensive second hand for what they offer, but they seem to be reliable enough.I have a friend who swears by secondhand Subarus and so far he seems to not have had too many issue.As Lou stated many utes, pickups and real SUVs (4x4) seem quite good.
  • 28-Cars-Later So is there some kind of undiagnosed disease where every rando thinks their POS is actually valuable?83K miles Ok.new valve cover gasket.Eh, it happens with age. spark plugsOkay, we probably had to be kewl and put in aftermarket iridium plugs, because EVO.new catalytic converterUh, yeah that's bad at 80Kish. Auto tranny failing. From the ad: the SST fails in one of the following ways:Clutch slip has turned into; multiple codes being thrown, shifting a gear or 2 in manual mode (2-3 or 2-4), and limp mode.Codes include: P2733 P2809 P183D P1871Ok that's really bad. So between this and the cat it suggests to me someone jacked up the car real good hooning it, because EVO, and since its not a Toyota it doesn't respond well to hard abuse over time.$20,000, what? Pesos? Zimbabwe Dollars?Try $2,000 USD pal. You're fracked dude, park it in da hood and leave the keys in it.BONUS: Comment in the ad: GLWS but I highly doubt you get any action on this car what so ever at that price with the SST on its way out. That trans can be $10k + to repair.
  • 28-Cars-Later Actually Honda seems to have a brilliant mid to long term strategy which I can sum up in one word: tariffs.-BEV sales wane in the US, however they will sell in Europe (and sales will probably increase in Canada depending on how their government proceeds). -The EU Politburo and Canada concluded a trade treaty in 2017, and as of 2024 99% of all tariffs have been eliminated.-Trump in 2018 threatened a 25% tariff on European imported cars in the US and such rhetoric would likely come again should there be an actual election. -By building in Canada, product can still be sold in the US tariff free though USMCA/NAFTA II but it should allow Honda tariff free access to European markets.-However if the product were built in Marysville it could end up subject to tit-for-tat tariff depending on which junta is running the US in 2025. -Profitability on BEV has already been a variable to put it mildly, but to take on a 25% tariff to all of your product effectively shuts you out of that market.
  • Lou_BC Actuality a very reasonable question.
Next