Will Mini's Slow U.S. Fade Soon End?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

As the U.S. auto industry achieved record sales volume in 2015, Mini’s U.S. sales were down 12 percent compared with Mini’s peak in 2013. And despite modest year-over-year growth in 2015, the year didn’t end so well. Mini sales plunged 20 percent in the fourth quarter, and sales have now declined in four of the last five months.

Through the first two months of 2016, U.S. Mini sales are down 13 percent, a loss of nearly 900 sales, even as industry sales grew by more than 3 percent. Indeed, in February, Mini volume plunged 24 percent as overall U.S. new vehicle volume rose to the highest February level since 2001.

Yet this is not a worldwide issue. Globally, Mini sales hit a record high in 2015 and are up 4 percent in the early part of 2016. Will a U.S. rebound soon follow?Lost sales from discontinued Minis (Paceman, Coupe, Roadster) or on-hiatus variants (Convertible) are clearly a factor in the decline. Through the first two months of 2016, sales of those models are down by 655 units.

Yet at the same time, Mini has added those sales right back from the return of a previously on-hiatus model, the Clubman, sales of which increased by – we’re not making this up – 655 units in January and February.

Sales of once “popular” Minis, however, are now genuinely uncommon by the standards of typical small cars.

Mini USA averaged approximately 1,900 monthly Countryman sales in 2014; fewer than 1,300 ever since. After a surprising 11-percent upward swing to more than 2,100 sales in December – we know BMW has some tricks up its sleeve for end-of-year sales spikes – only 1,085 Countrymans were sold during the first two months of 2016. The Countryman’s sharp 36-percent decline comes despite a 78-percent increase in subcompact crossover sales.

The Cooper Hardtop 2-Door, Mini’s original and best-selling model, lost 28 percent of its February sales and is down 23 percent so far this year. Only a portion of those lost sales were made up for by the year-old Cooper Hardtop 4-Door, which topped the Mini sales charts in January but then posted a 17-percent year-over-year decline in February.

Partly to blame, according to AutoPacific’s Dave Sullivan, is the glacial design shift. “Their vehicles are difficult to tell what is new and what is 10 years old for the common guy,” Sullivan says.

If an absence of freshness is a contributor, slim pickings are hardly a leading factor. As of February 1, Automotive News estimated that Mini had an 83-day supply of new vehicles, greater than the 77-day industry average. Cars.com’s current listings display 3,300 Countrymans and 6,000 Hardtops.

BMW doesn’t need to sell Minis like they’re Civics or Corollas to make a lot of money. With global success, it’s quite likely that a lingering U.S. fade won’t irreparably harm the Mini investment, either. But if BMW wants to replicate its past U.S. Mini success, a change is required. At the current pace, Mini won’t sell as many vehicles in the U.S. this year as the brand did in 2008, back when Mini was adding a third bodystyle to supplement the Hardtop and Convertible.

A remedy? “Maybe,” as Sullivan says, “Mini needs to adopt a marketing campaign that shows some of their vehicles are anything but mini.”

Indeed, in a market which still produces 14 percent of its sales from full-size pickups and their full-size SUV offspring, a market where many consumers continue to link the size of their payment to the size of their vehicle and now encounter no gas pump sticker shock, the very notion of premium-priced small cars is one discrepancy too far.

But a small car exterior with a big car interior? That may be the BMW marketer’s way forward for all Minis in America, the Clubman most obviously.

(Image Source: BMW North America)

Timothy Cain is the founder of GoodCarBadCar.net, which obsesses over the free and frequent publication of U.S. and Canadian auto sales figures. Follow on Twitter @goodcarbadcar and on Facebook.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 66 comments
  • Louis XVI Louis XVI on Mar 18, 2016

    I've had my Mini convertible for four years, and have already put almost 100,000 miles on it. It's by far (really far) the best car I've ever had. No mechanical failures other than typical wear and tear (e.g., tires); it's a ton of fun to drive, even as a daily driver; and, to my surprise, it handles the Minnesota winter just fine. When it eventually wears out, I'm pretty sure I'll buy another one.

  • Signal11 Signal11 on Mar 18, 2016

    Had a 2012 Countryman S AWD for three years. By far the least reliable and most trouble prone car I've ever had. Trouble started a few months in with a leaking moonroof that was so bad, I could hear water sloshing around in the car. Sprung an interior leak eventually and destroyed a $2500 laptop and ton of personal documents. At one point, I kept coming back to my parked car with the windows rolled halfway down. Then they started going down on their own while I was driving it. Required all the window motors be replaced. Faulty gas gauge, so I ran out of gas while driving to work one morning. Electricity cut out as I was pulling onto the on ramp/toll booth of a highway. Engine quickly followed. And on and on and on. Just one issue right after another nearly from the moment I got it to the moment I gave it back. I don't think I ever went three months without filling out a repair history field on TrueDelta. I wouldn't touch Mini again with a ten foot pole. Great fun to drive, though.

  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
  • 28-Cars-Later WSJ blurb in Think or Swim:Workers at Volkswagen's Tennessee factory voted to join the United Auto Workers, marking a historic win for the 89- year-old union that is seeking to expand where it has struggled before, with foreign-owned factories in the South.The vote is a breakthrough for the UAW, whose membership has shrunk by about three-quarters since the 1970s, to less than 400,000 workers last year.UAW leaders have hitched their growth ambitions to organizing nonunion auto factories, many of which are in southern states where the Detroit-based labor group has failed several times and antiunion sentiment abounds."People are ready for change," said Kelcey Smith, 48, who has worked in the VW plant's paint shop for about a year, after leaving his job at an Amazon.com warehouse in town. "We look forward to making history and bringing change throughout the entire South."   ...Start the clock on a Chattanooga shutdown.
Next