A Funeral at an Auto Show

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

Prior to the New York International Auto Show, Toyota distributed an upbeat press release. Come party with us, it said. “Scion is not going away quietly.”

Yet, as I walk toward Scion’s booth, a quiet unease fills a void once occupied by a loud, confident generational pulse. The typical eye-catching signs with heavily embossed, trendy hashtags are all but entirely absent upon my arrival. Massive subwoofers sit dormant inside 13 years’ worth of one-off tuner concepts. Engineered studio lighting softly highlights the vehicles on display, while simultaneously attempting to hide the vast, empty spaces between them.

Scion’s show booths are normally chock-full of tchotchkes and the beautiful people handing them out — but not today.

You see, Scion’s booth is located far away from the main action of the week. In many ways, Jacob Javits Center’s North Hall is the auto show version of New York’s Hart Island.

Shortly after the Civil War, Hart Island became the dumping ground of New York City’s unclaimed dead. The mass grave operates primarily as a potter’s field. North Hall, free of the constant hum of activity that electrifies the main auto show floor, is the surreal orphanage of brands oft-forgotten: Mitsubishi, Mini and (surprisingly) Subaru, in addition to Scion. And it’s in this hall that the Japanese giant’s uncommon resignation manifests itself. Scion sits cast out, chagrined, and surrounded by signs that read “Scion by Toyota” as if forced to completely give up its own identity.

Against an eerie backdrop of absolute silence, the booth operates entirely unstaffed. A security guard stands subdued in the far corner of the booth, swinging one of her legs to and fro as if to boringly kick an invisible soccer ball over and over. Near her, an auto show custodian kills time between vehicle dustings to aimlessly poke at one of the booth’s marketing installations.

Six concepts that helped define Scion’s raison d’être at various points in its brief history populate one end of booth. Among them is the near-perfect Scion BBx Concept that launched the brand in 2002 to near ravenous intrigue. It evolved soon after into the production Scion xB — a rebadged Japanese import loved by a generation that craved style and practicality in an affordable package. In contrast, the horrendous Slayer tC show car is evidence that Scion completely lost its way by 2014. It’s this sliding scale of concepts that portended the brand’s current reality of dissolution.

Just as I was contemplating my exit, a stocky man with thinning hair appears in the booth escorted by an entourage of handlers. He’s wearing a conservative suit that’s entirely unbecoming of a Scion enthusiast. Yet, this man is none other than Jim Lentz, founding vice president of Scion and current CEO of Toyota Motor North America.

I approach Mr. Lentz with trepidation, and — surprisingly — he’s more than willing to stand with me as we admire what once was and what will no longer be.

“It’s fun when you look at all the old concepts to see how daring Scion was to push the envelope,” Lentz says with a slight smile of remembrance. “It’s sad to see it go, but — at the same time — it served its purpose.”

I continue to peruse the booth after our chat, inspecting the vehicles and displays while also trying to understand this overwhelming sense of finality. There’s something soul crushing about it all, but I can’t put my finger on it. I feel like a club patron who’s arrived two hours too early.

Then I realize something staggering: nobody else is coming.

If you don’t remember, Scion’s purpose was to cater to us: the millennials who have slowly increased our buying power to a point where all automakers now consider us a force to be reckoned with. It stuck its neck out in 2003 when others refused to budge.

In years since, our generation has slowly built up its buying power to captivate the attention of Ford, GM, and even Toyota itself, to the point where Scion’s existence was no longer a niche proposition. Now, in its death, instead of being surrounded by friends in its time of hospice, Scion’s exit is being treated with the same collective indignity as Christo’s slow and painful death in “The Beach.” Why go to a funeral when there’s a party going on next door?

My only fear is that Scion’s story will be forgotten here, in this automotive Hart Island, and nobody will care enough in decades future to visit the dead.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 60 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Mar 26, 2016

    Baby Boomers were supposed to forever young and rebellious by design. GM's Saturn project was different from Scion in the sense that Saturns were unique designs including engines and not rebadges like Scions were. Saturn served its purpose but in best GM's tradition the parent company ignored its own experiment making it useless waste of money. So Saturn's death was a more depressing event event than Scion's. Olds was a real innovating company bought by GM and Pontiac was renamed Oakland Motor Car company from 30s - also the real car company bought by GM. Scion is more like Mercury.

    • See 2 previous
    • Thattruthguy Thattruthguy on Mar 27, 2016

      @Inside Looking Out GM started its US companion brands in the booming 20s, not during the depression. Exc for LaSalle, the second brands were killed in 1931 (they kept Pontiac instead of Oakland). In 1941, the LaSalle brand was killed and Cadillac expanded its catalog with cheaper cars.

  • Jacob Jacob on Mar 27, 2016

    If Scion disappears then what are the armchair automotive CEOs going to discuss?

  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
Next