NAIAS 2016: 2017 Mercedes-Benz E-Class is the Base, But Far From Basic

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

When you consider the 2017 Mercedes-Benz E-Class will spawn nearly a baker’s dozen variants in its time — coupes, performance models, wagons (please?) — the donor sedan can end up less thrilling than white bread. The remedy for this, like anything else in life, is to put a screen on it.

Fussy child? Screen. Long flight? Screen. Mid-size luxury sedan? You guessed it.

In addition to sporting the much hyped configurable screen setup from this year’s Consumer Electronics Show, the new 2017 Mercedes-Benz E-Class will sport two fewer cylinders (to start) and a longer list of semi-autonomous driving features that won’t be available in the U.S. to start.

What we will see later this year is a base E300 powered by a turbocharged four cylinder that makes 241 horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque, pumped through Mercedes’ new nine-speed automatic transmission. The base E300 is down 61 horsepower from this year’s naturally aspirated V-6 in the E350, which may return in all-wheel drive form later. That may not matter, though, depending on how much weight Daimler has stripped out of its executive saloon (they didn’t reveal those details)

We already know that the twin-turbo V-6 in the E400 will be the tops of the range without affixing AMG to the E-Class — so don’t hold your breath for a V-8. Maybe the new E-Class plug-in hybrid will turn your crank instead?

Although the outward appearance of the new E-Class is distinct and noticeable from last generation, the car’s interior received the most attention. Standard for the E300 is a panoramic 12.3-inch display that rivals the computer screen that yours truly used to hammer out this story. The large screen is controlled by a trackpad a la C-Series and S-Series, but also responds to steering wheel-mounted, swipeable inputs.

According to Mercedes, the wheelbase for the new E-Class has been stretched 2 full inches, although overall length has only grown 1.7 inches. It’s unclear if rear passengers will see the fruits of the Merc’s longer chassis, so we’ll have to wait when the cars finally arrive this summer.

Mercedes hasn’t yet announced pricing for the E-Class, but it’s clear that the current models asking price of more than $53,000 to start won’t budge.

Sometime after launch, Mercedes says it’ll introduce in the U.S for the first time the ability to autonomously change lanes in the new E-Class, park the car without the driver, and some car-to-road communication wizardry. Before we get those features however, the new E-Class will sport the same tech found in the S-Class: Distance Pilot DISTRONIC, which can follow a car ahead of it up to 130 mph; Steering Pilot, which can read and follow clearly marked roads up to 130 mph; and Active Brake Assist.

From the outside, the new E-Class sports a similar appearance to the C-Class, albeit longer and wider. Two different grille configurations for base and sport versions of the sedan have been carried over from the current generation, and there will be a diesel version of the sedan. Whether that diesel will be available in the U.S. is currently open for debate.














Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Jan 11, 2016

    Two many doors. Boring!

  • Cbrworm Cbrworm on Jan 11, 2016

    It looks interesting, definitely a few retro cues. The striped piano black/stainless combo is a bit much for me, but I can see a target audience to which it would appeal. The look is attractive, I personally prefer something a little more subdued. With the full LCD gauges, are they visible with polarized sunglasses on? I have trouble viewing the screens in my current cars, but they are only for Audio/HVAC (and iDrive). Have they overcome this? My thought had been that OLED would be the solution, but it appears LCD is becoming more prevalent.

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next