2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata Review - An Original Reborn (Video)

Alex L. Dykes
by Alex L. Dykes
Fast Facts

2016 Mazda MX-5

2.0-liter DOHC I-4, direct injection, CVVT, (155 horsepower @ 6,000 rpm; 148 lbs-ft @ 4,600)
6-speed manual, optional 6-speed auto
27 city/34 highway/30 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
31.5 (Observed, MPG)
Base Price
$25,735*
As Tested
$33,750*
* Prices include $820 destination charge.
2016 mazda mx 5 miata review an original reborn video

If there is one constant in the automotive world, it is that every redesigned vehicle gets bigger, more powerful, heavier and more complex. Bucking that trend is Mazda’s latest MX-5, one of the smallest and lightest cars sold in the United States.

Since the launch of the Miata in 1989, Mazda’s tiny roadster has been a beacon of light to those who prefer a “pure” driving experience. The MX-5’s core mission of being an affordable, lightweight, two-seat convertible has hardly changed. More impressive: The 2016 MX-5 is about the same size as the original Miata, and the new roadster is only 182 pounds heavier despite producing 50-percent more power and being 30-percent more fuel efficient. The price tag has also been kept in check. The 2016 model still costs about the same as a mid-sized sedan.

Making the MX-5 even more special is that it stands alone in America. Sure, Alfa is now selling their sexy and expensive 4C here, BMW still has a Z4 roadster, and Scion and Subaru are selling their two-door coupé — but none of these are like the MX-5 and that’s a good thing for Mazda.

Let’s talk about curb weights and MSRPs first, as they are key to understanding this roadster.

The base, six-speed manual MX-5 tips the scales at 2,332 pounds and ends at 2,381 pounds with the six-speed automatic and all options ticked. That means the new Miata is actually 150 pounds lighter than its immediate predecessor. More interesting is the comparison to the 1990 Miata: the fourth-generation MX05 which is just 180 pounds heavier than the original.

Not impressed? Consider the safety features standard today that were not even available 25 years ago — side impact airbags, tougher side impact standards and seat belt pre-tensioners and force limiters. Then consider the creature comforts like navigation, Bluetooth and touchscreen infotainment we didn’t have in 1990.

Still not impressed? The 2016 MX-5 is actually lighter than the carbon fiber monocoque Alfa Romeo 4C in America.

You may be scratching your head if you’re reading this outside of North America. You see, international versions of the Alfa Romeo and Mazda two seaters are lighter than their more plump American siblings. The 4C in Europe is a slim 2,153 pounds and the MX-5 is 2,200. The American MX-5 gains weight because it receives a bigger engine — with an extra 29 horsepower and 37 lbs-ft of torque to match. The 4C, however, gains weight because the European version doesn’t meet U.S. crash standards. Alfa Romeo had to substantially alter the the carbon fiber tub and add side impact airbags in order for it to be sold. The total toll on the Alfa side is a substantial 342 pounds — and safety doesn’t bring additional horsepower and torque.

The Miata’s lightness still wears a svelte price tag. Starting at $25,735 (after $820 destination) and ending at $35,750, the MX-5 is only a hair more expensive than the 1990 model accounting for inflation. Much of the Miata’s draw is its accessibility; for less than a Honda Accord EX, you can put a rear-wheel-drive roadster in your garage.

Exterior


The Miata has never been about breakneck speed nor outlandish looks. That’s as true for this Miata as it was in 1990. Even though the 2016 looks meaner and more chiseled, it’s instantly recognizable as a Miata. This is because Mazda didn’t graft their latest look onto the MX-5. Instead, designers penned a modern homage to the original. The unique look features a large black grille opening and angry-birds inspired LED headlamps on every model. Sadly, in states that require a front license plate, the look is a bit Bucky Beaver.

Turn the car 90 degrees and you’ll still see the profile of a classic British roadster: long hood, short passenger compartment and a perky trunk. Out back, the look is a little more in tune with the rest of the Mazda lineup, with tail lamps styled after the Mazda6. Mazda’s obsession with weight savings means you won’t find massive twin exhaust tips, electric spoilers or anything that isn’t absolutely necessary.

Interior


Like the Alfa Romeo 4C, ultra-light construction means sacrifices inside. Unlike Alfa, Mazda’s designers were not willing to make too many sacrifices. As a result the two companies took different approaches to weight savings.

In the 4C, it seems engineers simply threw pieces out to save weight and the result is a fairly stark cabin. At Mazda, it appears engineers were determined to make the MX-5 look like your average Mazda on the inside while cutting out the ounces that weren’t necessary. While Alfa eschews luxuries like carpet, sound deadening foam, padded arm rests, usable cup holders, a navigation system and storage cubbies, you’ll find all of that in the Mazda. And yet the Mazda is still lighter.

Although you still won’t find power seats in its cabin (they add weight), the MX-5’s standard seats are more comfortable than those in the Scion, Subaru or, yes, even the Alfa. That’s not to say they are perfect, as lumbar support is not offered on any trim and Mazda uses a lighter mechanism that lifts up the front of the seat bottom cushion for improved thigh support instead of lifting the full seat bottom.

Infotainment


Like most Mazdas, the MX-5 has a touchscreen infotainment system grafted to the dashboard. The 7-inch LCD is reminiscent of an iPad or Android tablet and is standard on all trim levels. In the center console, we have an iDrive/MMI-like controller knob with a button array for direct access to certain menus. Similar to Infiniti’s systems, you can navigate with either the controller, the touchscreen or both depending on what is easier at the moment — as long as you’re parked. Touchscreen functionality is locked out above 5 mph, allowing only voice and control knob inputs.

Smartphone app integration for streaming media is standard and shoppers can add navigation software to the display even after you buy the car. Although some folks seem to dislike the look, the software is intuitive and easy to use. Mazda promises future apps will be integrated into the software, but we haven’t really seen much movement in that direction since the system was first launched in the 2014 Mazda3. Still, this is light years ahead of the cheezy stereo you find in the Alfa and at least a few steps ahead of anything in the FR-S or BRZ.

Also worth noting in the MX-5 is the sound system. It has one. For $70,000, Alfa provides a few speakers and an Alpine head unit from Best Buy. Because two seat roadsters have little room for rear speakers, most manufacturers simply don’t install them. Mazda decided instead to have Bose fit a few into the headrests and the solution sounds surprisingly natural. When using the integrated Bluetooth speakerphone, the other party’s voice comes out of the headrest speakers on the driver’s side. This means you can hear the call even with the top down. Whether or not they can hear you is another story entirely.

Drivetrain


While other world markets have to make do with a 1.5-liter four cylinder making 129 horsepower, MX-5 models bound for America get Mazda’s latest 2.0-liter SkyActiv four-cylinder engine. The direct-injected engine is essentially the same as we find in the CX-5 but tweaked for the MX-5’s rear-wheel-drive layout. Power figures come in at the same 155 ponies as the CX-5, but torque drops by 2 lb-ft to 148 with its peak arriving 600 rpm later than in Mazda’s crossover.

The reason for de-tune is likely due to the positioning of the engine and the space required for Mazda’s Medusa 4-2-1 exhaust manifold (pictured below, with the “lid” removed, from a Mazda3). The manifold design allows for optimum exhaust gas scavenging while still keeping the bundle of snakes close to the catalytic converter for faster warm up times. On the downside, it’s enormous and tricky to package in the MX-5 where its front suspension is close to the exhaust manifold. As a result, some changes had to be made and this is likely the reason for the alteration in the torque curve.

Sending the power to the rear wheels is your choice of a six-speed manual transmission or a six speed automatic. If you opt for the six-speed manual and the Club trim, you’ll find a torque-sensing limited slip differential in the back. Sadly, the the LSD is not available in any other trim.

Thanks to its ultralight curb weight and modern engine design, the MX-5’s fuel economy is impressive and premium gasoline is only recommended — not required. According to the EPA, the combined fuel economy should average 30 mpg regardless of transmission or trim choice, which is an enormous 7 mpg leap from the previous Miata. Because of U.S. fuel standards, Mazda’s 2.0-liter SkyActiv engine uses a reduced 13:0 compression ratio versus 14:1 in Europe, which, according to Mazda, results in a 5-percent loss of efficiency. Blame Washington.

Drive


Obviously, with a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine under the hood, acceleration numbers are not breathtaking — but they are still faster than the FR-S or BRZ.

Despite the Subie and Scion offering a better power to weight ratio, the highly strung boxer engine they use just can’t match Mazda’s low-end torque. Talking pure numbers, the MX-5 ran from 0-30 in 2.0 seconds and hit 60 in 6.3 — about 2/10ths faster than the Scion or Subaru. While not overtly fast, this is the fastest MX-5 yet. If you want a faster Miata, the Fiat 124 Spider — or “Fiata” — uses a 1.4-liter turbo engine good for 160 horsepower and 184 lbs-ft of twist. Although the turbo in the Fiat adds about 100 pounds, the power comes on sooner, torque hangs out longer and Fiat fiddled with the final drive ratios to sacrifice fuel economy on the altar of performance. Thanks to the tire selection on our Club model and the optional Brembo brake setup, 60-0 stopping distances were short and fade resistance was excellent.

Comparing the MX-5 to the competition simply in terms of acceleration and horizontal Gs would be missing the whole point of the roadster. (Although it still pulls more Gs than the Toyobaru.) The Mazda is all about feel. The engagement of the clutch is linear and the pedal weight is perfect (which is easy to accomplish when you have a light weight vehicle and an engine that only makes 148 lbs-ft of torque). The manual shifter features short throws and a notchy feel that reminded me of BMWs from the ’90s. The small dimensions and light weight allow comparatively small tires that range from 195/50R16 to our model’s 205/45R17 summer rubber. Wider tires would allow more grip but, yet again, that would be missing the point. Being able to get the MX-5’s rear end to kick out is part of the fun.

When the road starts winding, you start to understand how everything comes together. With a slight front weight bias and the same tires front and rear, the MX-5 tends to understeer a hair in neutral handling situations. Add a little extra power and the rear end rotates willingly and predictably. Even the somewhat narrow tires play into the MX-5s handling. Like the Toyobaru, the MX-5 allows you to experience the joys of a well balanced, rear-wheel-drive car at sane speeds. Sure, the Audi S7 we recently looked at or the Alfa 4C have limits that are much higher than the MX-5, but the Mazda is simply more fun. The Alfa is a hoot and a half to drive without question, but the strong rear weight bias means that things can get unpredictable if you have the stability control disabled. It also takes more concentration to drive at 9/10ths. Although 9/10ths in the MX-5 would be 6/10ths in the 4C, the Miata feels more natural, easier going, less frenetic. When pitted against the Z4 or Boxster, the Germans just feel fat, heavy and isolated.

Over a week of driving the MX-5 hard we still averaged an impressive 31.5 mpg, a hair higher than the EPA average and 9 mpg better than the last MX-5 I drove. Whether your numbers are 25- or the near 50-percent improvement we saw, this is one economical drop top. That’s thanks to the obsessive dedication to curb weight.

You may be surprised to hear the MX-5 has a fairly compliant suspension despite the focus on Zoom Zoom. Mazda realizes that many shoppers intend to commute in their roadster and not have it sit in the garage. Even our tester, which was fitted with Bilstein dampers and low profile tires, was firm without being harsh.

If the Miata sounds too good to be true, there are some sore points. The first is the stability control. Although it can be disabled, the software’s default programming causes it to intervene early. I found it overly intrusive on roads I knew well. The next is the steering. It’s perfection for an electric power steering rack — but it’s still an electric power steering rack. (This is sort of like saying, “the best cup of coffee in England.” Yes it is coffee, but it’ll still make you a little sad.) There is a hint of feedback, but this isn’t the rack from your 1990s Miata. (Hopefully someone will create a manual steering conversion.) The last item is the cabin noise. Admittedly, our Club Sport model trades the increased weight of the Brembo brakes for the reduced weight of a single layer top — but any way you slice it, this cabin is far from Lexus quiet. The issue isn’t road noise, it’s the wind noise. Because of the design of the window seals, there’s a constant rumble from the area of the side view mirrors. Even with the double-layer top you find in other models, noise from behind the driver’s head is excessive. I measured 76 dB at 50 mph, which is just 1/2 a dB quieter than the 4C. For the record, the 4C is the loudest car I have tested in the last decade.

Miata comparisons are difficult. Aside from the recently announced Fiata, the MX-5 has little natural competition. It’s priced in the same range as the FR-S and BRZ, but the Mazda is a 2-seat roadster and not a hard-top coupé with back seats. The Saturn Sky, Pontiac Solstice and Honda S2000 clearly had the Mazda in their sights, but they’re all long gone. The Porsche Boxster and BMW Z3 of yesteryear were slightly spendier options for the shopper that wanted something light and fun, but they too have given way to newer versions that are bigger, fatter and more expensive. The Alfa Romeo and Lotus competition will cost you two to three times as much to buy and probably eat you out of house and home on maintenance.

With little real competition, why bother with a redesign at all? Excellent question. If my penny-pinching self had been in charge, Mazda would still be selling you the older Miata with a new infotainment system and a few new color options. Be glad I’m not running Mazda. Instead, we get a new take on the original mission of the Miata: the ultimate affordable roadster.

Mazda provided the vehicle, insurance and one tank of gas for this review.

Specifications as tested

0-30: 2.0 seconds

0-60: 6.3 seconds

1/4 Mile: 14.5 seconds @ 92 mph














Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 59 comments
  • Seanx37 Seanx37 on Dec 15, 2015

    It doesn't seem like remotely enough power from a 2.0 liter. After all, Honda can get lot more out of the same size engine. A hundred more in fact, on the first s2000. At this price range, 200hp should be the minimum. Although I don't think I really fit in this generation Miata either.

    • JuniperBug JuniperBug on Dec 16, 2015

      Yeah, lots of people said that when the horsepower figure was announced. And then Car & Driver pulled off a 0-60 time of 5.9 seconds. (I suspect Mr. Dykes' 6.3 time is a result of a much less aggressive methodology than C&D uses in their tests.) Compare that to C&D's 6.4 second time in the 200 hp FR-S. 0-60 in under 6 seconds is a very respectable time for a car which has never been about the numbers, especially when you consider its combined 30 MPG figure. And not to speak ill of the departed, because I love the S2000, but the original AP1 - the one with the 2.0 litre - would cost nearly USD44,000 in today's money, was often described to be about as quick as a Civic below 6,000 RPM, and even though it had 85 more peak horsepower (not 100), according to Car & Driver, it was slower both 0-60 (by nearly a full second at 6.8) and in the quarter mile. The AP2 was quicker, but also had a bigger 2.2L engine.

  • Jacob Jacob on Dec 20, 2015

    1. Since when exactly a Honda Accord EX an entry level car? Besides Navi, Leather seats, or premium audio system (available on Accord EX-L with Navi) 25.7K for a toy car with minimal amenities is a horrendous value. 2. Placing speaker behind your head should never feel natural. That is why most car audio systems should like sh1t. Let's go to the basics of the stereo recordings. They are optimized for a listener who is sitting behind two speakers, left and right, and approximately equidistant from both of them. Stereo recording cannot sound "natural" with any speakers behind your ears. Granted, a few really clever companies have come up with a way to convert the stereo signal of an audio recording into a true surround sound, such as with 5.1 or 7.1 speakers, and such systems can sound very good. But most cars do not have this, and simply play the same stereo signal on front and rear speakers. Granted, if Bose was involved, they probably added some surround sound processing.

  • Nrd515 I bought an '88 S10 Blazer with the 4.3. We had it 4 years and put just about 48K on it with a bunch of trips to Nebraska and S. Dakota to see relatives. It had a couple of minor issues when new, a piece of trim fell off the first day, and it had a seriously big oil leak soon after we got it. The amazinly tiny starter failed at about 40K, it was fixed under some sort of secret warranty and we got a new Silverado as a loaner. Other than that, and a couple of tires that blew when I ran over some junk on the road, it was a rock. I hated the dash instrumentation, and being built like a gorilla, it was about an inch and a half too narrow for my giant shoulders, but it drove fine, and was my second most trouble free vehicle ever, only beaten by my '82 K5 Blazer, which had zero issues for nearly 50K miles. We sold the S10 to a friend, who had it over 20 years and over 400,000 miles on the original short block! It had a couple of transmissions, a couple of valve jobs, a rear end rebuild at 300K, was stolen and vandalized twice, cut open like a tin can when a diabetic truck driver passed out(We were all impressed at the lack of rust inside the rear quarters at almost 10 years old, and it just went on and on. Ziebart did a good job on that Blazer. All three of his sons learned to drive in it, and it was only sent to the boneyard when the area above the windshield had rusted to the point it was like taking a shower when it rained. He now has a Jeep that he's put a ton of money into. He says he misses the S10's reliablity a lot these days, the Jeep is in the shop a lot.
  • Jeff S Most densely populated areas have emission testing and removing catalytic converters and altering pollution devices will cause your vehicle to fail emission testing which could effect renewing license plates. In less populated areas where emission testing is not done there would probably not be any legal consequences and the converter could either be removed or gutted both without having to buy specific parts for bypassing emissions. Tampering with emission systems would make it harder to resell a vehicle but if you plan on keeping the vehicle and literally running it till the wheels fall off there is not much that can be done if there is no emission testing. I did have a cat removed on a car long before mandatory emission testing and it did get better mpgs and it ran better. Also had a cat gutted on my S-10 which was close to 20 years old which increased performance and efficiency but that was in a state that did not require emission testing just that reformulated gas be sold during the Summer months. I would probably not do it again because after market converters are not that expensive on older S-10s compared to many of the newer vehicles. On newer vehicles it can effect other systems that are related to the operating and the running of the vehicle. A little harder to defeat pollution devices on newer vehicles with all the systems run by microprocessors but if someone wants to do it they can. This law could be addressing the modified diesels that are made into coal rollers just as much as the gasoline powered vehicles with cats. You probably will still be able to buy equipment that would modify the performance of a vehicles as long as the emission equipment is not altered.
  • ToolGuy I wonder if Vin Diesel requires DEF.(Does he have issues with Sulfur in concentrations above 15ppm?)
  • ToolGuy Presented for discussion: https://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper2/thoreau/civil.html
  • Kevin Ford can do what it's always done. Offer buyouts to retirement age employees, and transfers to operating facilities to those who aren't retirement age. Plus, the transition to electric isn't going to be a finger snap one time event. It's going to occur over a few model years. What's a more interesting question is: Where will today's youth find jobs in the auto industry given the lower employment levels?
Next