Report: Volkswagen Lobbied for More Tax Credits for Diesels

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Volkswagen lobbied hard in 2011 to receive the same — or higher — clean vehicle credits as electric cars, the New York Times reported Wednesday.

“They wanted a special deal for diesel cars that we now know weren’t even meeting the standard,” Margo Oge, a former director of the E.P.A. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, told the New York Times.

The LA Times reported that roughly $51 million in credits was paid by taxpayers in 2009 for diesel cars that lied about mileage and emissions — essentially a cheap bar trick.

A U.S. Senate committee is investigating possible fraud by the automaker for receiving taxpayer money for cars that spewed up to 40 times more nitrogen oxide than allowed. U.S. Sens. Orrin Hatch and Ron Wyden sent a letter to the automaker Tuesday, according to Automotive News, asking how the automaker certified its car for a $1,300 credit based on mileage in 2008.

The New York Times report said Volkswagen lobbied federal authorities for higher incentives on their diesel vehicles, claiming that they were — in some cases — better than electric vehicles.

“These people had religion,” Oge told the New York Times. “And that religion was diesel. They simply did not believe in electric powertrains and thought they were a waste of time.”

Oge said that now-suspended engineer Wolfgang Hatz was particularly outspoken about the tax credits going to diesel cars. The Wall Street Journal reported that investigators have focused their attention on Hatz, who was Volkswagen’s chief engineer at the time, and Ulrich Hackenberg who was on Volkswagen’s board for development.

According to Oge, who is now a vice chairman at DeltaWing Technologies, representatives from Volkswagen in Germany were upset when authorities didn’t grant the same credits to those cars.

“I never had a problem dealing with the Americans. The U.S. Volkswagen people would always come and apologize to us after meeting with the Germans,” she told the Times. “My sense was that things were being dictated by Germany.”

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • Pricha33 Pricha33 on Oct 07, 2015

    The credit was for the higher fuel mileage of the vehicles. Did they fib on that one, if anything they were too low on their estimates as TDI owners will tell you, get about 5mpg higher than estimated. I don;t want a car that is dead on the road when the battery goes dead, my commute exceeds every golf cart short of a Tesla. Pat.

    • Scoutdude Scoutdude on Oct 08, 2015

      No their MPG CERTIFICATION is not low it is right on when the vehicle is running in cheat mode, not the real world. Also take those reported "real world" numbers with a grain of salt. Many of the people who buy TDIs do so because their use is suited to it. Also many people who buy cars based on MPG tend to A) drive in a manner that is conducive to better MPG and B) are generous with their rounding up/report their best tank not their everyday average.

  • Anonymous Anonymous on Oct 07, 2015

    Trump's exit plan for illegals should include sending them back in TDIs. Sooner or later he's going to need a serious campaign manager. Mr. Trump... I'm available.

  • Corey Lewis Facing rearwards and typing while in motion. I'll be sick in 4 minutes or less.
  • Ajla It's a tricky situation. If public charging is ubiquitous and reliable then range doesn't matter nearly as much. However they likely don't need to be as numerous as fuel pumps because of the home/work charging ability. But then there still might need to be "surge supply" of public chargers for things like holidays. Then there's the idea of chargers with towing accessibility. A lack of visible charging infrastructure might slow the adoption of EVs as well. Having an EV with a 600+ mile range would fix a lot of the above but that option doesn't seem to be economically feasible.
  • 28-Cars-Later I'm getting a Knight Rider vibe... or is it more Knightboat?
  • 28-Cars-Later "the person would likely be involved in taking the Corvette to the next level with full electrification."Chevrolet sold 37,224 C8s in 2023 starting at $65,895 in North America (no word on other regions) while Porsche sold 40,629 Taycans worldwide starting at $99,400. I imagine per unit Porsche/VAG profit at $100K+ but was far as R&D payback and other sunk costs I cannot say. I remember reading the new C8 platform was designed for hybrids (or something to that effect) so I expect Chevrolet to experiment with different model types but I don't expect Corvette to become the Taycan. If that is the expectation, I think it will ride off into the sunset because GM is that incompetent/impotent. Additional: In ten years outside of wrecks I expect a majority of C8s to still be running and economically roadworthy, I do not expect that of Taycans.
  • Tassos Jong-iL Not all martyrs see divinity, but at least you tried.
Next