Automakers Desperate To Attract Younger Generation of Workers

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

Automotive News reported Saturday that several automakers are struggling to attract younger workers as young adults seem more disinterested with pursuing careers in manufacturing.

Kia Motors Manufacturing Georgia Senior Vice President Randy Jackson said it’s important for the auto industry to soften the blow of reality when adulthood sets in:

“So many kids want to grow up and play in the NFL,” he says. “And college is a great thing, and it’s good to have a dream job out there. But if we can reach young people before they spend four years in college pursuing something that isn’t realistic, we might be able to open their eyes to something they will find very rewarding.”

According to the report, only 39 percent of children in Detroit said they would consider a career in the automotive industry and only 41 percent of their parents and teachers would recommend the industry too them.

Attracting and retaining younger manufacturing talent isn’t a struggle the automotive industry has on its own. As manufacturing jobs have left the States, so have interest in the remaining jobs. In 1953, manufacturing accounted for 28 percent of GDP in the U.S., but in 2012, that figure was around 11 percent. Many manufacturers say that students have the wrong impression of what assembly lines look like now.

“People still have the idea that manufacturing is a dirty dungeon place,” Andy Bushmaker of KI Furniture, told USA Today.

Several automakers, including Honda, have offered clinics and instructional booths to help attract workers. Honda has estimated that the U.S. will add 3.4 million manufacturing jobs by 2025, but will only have 1.4 million workers to fill those positions. In Ohio, the company has spent $1 million to attract middle- and high-school students to its jobs.

(Photo courtesy Wikipedia)


Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 185 comments
  • Sco Sco on Oct 17, 2015

    Thanks as usual Mikey for keeping it real

  • Thelaine Thelaine on Oct 18, 2015

    Economic growth has slowed so far in the twenty-first century. Taxes, regulations, aggressive redistribution of all types, uncontrolled illegal immigration, and other key disincentives for economic productivity and growth must be pared back or eliminated in the coming years in order for the economy to grow to the extent that the country can flourish in the future. Sticking with the status quo, on the other hand, will ultimately lead to further stagnation, decreased influence, a vanishing middle class, and a declining standard of living for all but the wealthiest. Voters will have to choose which of the two roads the country will take: growth and prosperity or statism, redistribution and stagnation.

  • EBFlex Garbage but for less!
  • FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
  • RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
  • Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
  • Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Next