Kia Sportspace Heading To Production Within 18 Months

by Cameron Aubernon

March 5th, 2015 3:43 AM

kia sportspace heading to production within 18 months

Eighteen months from now, the Kia Sportspace will make the leap from the design studio to European showrooms.

According to Top Gear, Kia Europe CEO Michael Cole says the estate is part of the automaker’s plans to “enter segments that [Kia’s] not in to support [its] growth. In Europe particularly the D-segment wagon is a volume segment, so it’s worth going for.”

The Sportspace is also leading the way toward a sportier, performance-oriented direction for Kia, which currently includes the green-lit twin-turbo V6 GT. Though the estate boasts Optima’s T-Hybrid diesel-electric powertrain — whose output of 170 horsepower is directed to the front when the estate’s temporary AWD is not in use — Cole says a high-performance version could come “much further down the line.”

#Estates #EuropeanDomesticMarket #Kia #Sportspace

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 21 comments

Daviel on Mar 05, 2015

I'll buy one the minute it's sold here. 15 - 24 months is about right.

Like Reply
Signal11 on Mar 05, 2015

It's stunning to me just how many comments on car blogs are about the greenhouse and the high belt lines. If you're snarkily commenting about high beltlines and small greenhouses, as if anything could be done about them (especially in wagons), then you're basically loudly proclaiming that you're not one to pay much attention to visual details and are basically (haha) blind. Short of a massive shift in engine design and placement or drastic advances in materials engineering, those beltlines are not coming down. The only way you increase the greenhouse and improve the sight lines in a modern sedan is by raising the roofline and raising the seating. Lo and behold, a CUV. Which is ironic, considering the same "car guys" who complain about the visibility in modern cars will turn right around and complain about the proliferation of CUVs, as if one didn't lead to the other and mainstream consumers weren't acting rationally.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Danio3834 on Mar 05, 2015
  
  I can understand the complaints of not-so-great visibility. I appreciate that, I really do, but I've never decided not to buy a car because I couldn't see every inch around it. My current daily, a Challenger, is practically a pillbox. Hasn't adversely affected me one bit. I just reverse slowly and carefully out of spaces in crowded lots. The cross traffic alert and backup cam help out quite a bit.
  
  Like
- Krhodes1 on Mar 05, 2015
  
  Of course you can lower the beltline. The windows do NOT have to be even with the top of the cowling. See a Volvo 945 for how to do this correctly - the beltline is lower than the cowling by the full height of the mirrors. This is nothing but a stupid fashion trend that has continued because it is a way to help side impact crash results a little on the cheap, and it clinics well with idiots who "feel safe" when they are sitting in a nearly windowless bunker. There is also no reason you can't also raise the roof a couple inches and provide both more glass and decent headroom, without raising the ride height to CUV levels. But mostly it is fashion, just like nearly all sedans needing to be as swoopy in the rear as coupes.
  
  Like
GeneralMalaise on Mar 06, 2015

Sweet looking design. Put a "panoramic" sunroof on and it's a winner in my book.

Like Reply
Richard on Mar 06, 2015

The problem with the belt-line is the angle it rises at. I have sat in so many cars with a high belt-line which makes life mierable for small kids in the back as well as giving a bad view out. The belt-line can be unrelated to the cowl. One of the earlier posts about the Volvo 940 makes this point. All it will take is some designer to find another way to say "modern" and the style will go away.

Like Reply