By on December 11, 2014

CFPB - Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Sign

A trade group representing lenders is finding the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposal to regulate non-bank auto lenders too much to bear.

According to Automotive News, the American Financial Services Association says “the threshold the CFPB proposes for larger participants in the automobile finance market is too low,” and could disproportionately drive up compliance costs, push out smaller lenders from the auto finance game, and make things more difficult for the consumer as far as credit goes.

The threshold in question defines said participants as those originating 10,000 or more auto loans and leases in a given year, a definition that could fit 38 lenders representing 91 percent of all non-bank institutions. The AFSA suggests a threshold of 50,000 loans and leases in a given year, excluding smaller players while putting the oversight upon 17 lenders, or 86 percent of the non-bank market.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

5 Comments on “Trade Group: CFPB Non-Bank Oversight Threshold ‘Too Low’...”


  • avatar
    Xeranar

    So the difference of 7% of the total market and 21 lenders is at stake? Interesting. The regulatory back end may make sense to lift the threshold as greater competition is worthwhile but on the same token if those 21 lenders are using unregulated techniques to exploit that 7% of the market that’s not a worthwhile movement. The complexity of the question is so far beyond this soundbite that to have any real analysis on it is impossible without further review.

  • avatar
    Felix Hoenikker

    Sleazy lenders watch out. Elizabeth W is watching you!

  • avatar
    J.Emerson

    So what’s the endgame here? Most likely, the large lenders would figure out a way to restructure their operations so that they’d all fall below the 50,000 threshold. These types of “suggestions” tend to be more about evasion than anything else.

    • 0 avatar
      highdesertcat

      “These types of “suggestions” tend to be more about evasion than anything else.”

      I agree. But Xer is also right. This is far more complex than what is covered here.

      It’s all about making money, any which way they can. They win a few, they lose a few. The end result must be to win more than they lose in order to make money.

      With too much regulation, we may see fewer people qualify for any kind of loans. And that would hurt the US economy.

      So, the bottom line is for the CFPB to tread lightly.

  • avatar
    1998S90

    Cockroaches tend to scatter when you shine the light on them.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • dwford: All these comments and no one mentions the obvious solution: Buick Cascada You can easily get one within your...
  • rpm773: While I very much dislike the idea, as long as this subscription nonsense stays in the > $90K...
  • Scoutdude: Hey at least Corey is consistently producing content. These are the types of articles he does.
  • Scoutdude: I’m in a similar situation but I’d like to keep it around $15k and top down motoring is a...
  • Arthur Dailey: Auto manufacturing in Canada was successful under the Auto Pact, which was eventually ruled...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber