NHTSA Under The Gun Again Over Handling Of Takata Airbag Recall

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon
nhtsa under the gun again over handling of takata airbag recall

Not long after undergoing scrutiny over its part of the February 2014 General Motors ignition switch recall, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration once again is under the gun, this time in its handling of the Takata airbag crisis.

Automotive News reports that the agency’s mostly hands-off approach, allowing automakers to use field actions to recall vehicles in a handful of states and territories where the possibility for catastrophic failure is greatest, is following the same track as the one that ultimately led GM to recall 2.6 million vehicles made in the early to mid-2000s, though on a greater scale.

Additionally, the NHTSA hasn’t ordered Takata itself to recall its defective airbags, mainly as it waits for more data to confirm the airbags are likely to act more like Claymores than safety devices under high humidity. In fact, the two parties entered into an agreement in June where affected automakers would conduct said field actions in only areas where those conditions are most prevalent — such as Florida and Puerto Rico, where six reports of failure were recorded. The airbags collected would then be tested, with the results sent to investigators.

As the recall widens its net further, the NHTSA is being investigated by the U.S. Department of Transportation, whose secretary, Anthony Foxx, received a letter from Senators Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Ed Markley of Massachusetts — both heavy critics of the NHTSA’s handling of the GM recall — urging Foxx to order the agency to be more assertive:

NHTSA should immediately issue a nationwide safety recall on all the affected cars, regardless of where the car is registered. We have become increasingly troubled and alarmed by the confusing and conflicting advice being issued by NHTSA and the glacial pace of the agency’s response to this public safety threat.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Manhattan, still investigating the GM recall, is now ordering an investigation into the Takata recall.

Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • VoGo VoGo on Oct 27, 2014

    Yet another media circus. I read yesterday that more Americans had married Kim Kardashian than had died from Ebola. Same deal; it's all about ratings.

  • Eamiller Eamiller on Oct 27, 2014

    I think this is a good thing. Doing recalls just because the car is currently registered in an area with a humid climate ignores all potential past usage of that vehicle. How long does it need to be exposed before becoming an issue? Will my family trip to Florida for a week potentially cause a problem? It's clear that this recall is seriously lacking data, and relying on the recall itself to generate the data by deploying the replaced bags. The issue here is that you'll never know it's defective until it's too late. Given the relatively low deployment percentage of a vehicle population, it is probably tough for them to extrapolate the statistics on this one. Takata showed some pretty disturbing lack of production control in their manufacturing plant. Quite frankly, this is shocking coming from a Japanese company, but this isn't the first time Takata has cost manufacturers plenty. Back in the 80s, Takata forgot to put UV stabilizer in the plastics used in their seatbelt release buttons. This would cause the plastic to disintegrate into the buckle and prevent secure latching of the belt.

  • Art Vandelay The Peter Puffing by Tassos and EBFlex isn't the only thing that's "hot" in these!
  • Art Vandelay That rust isn't terrible honestly. Floor pans commonly need some love on these and I have seen waaaay worse. Car looks complete and original. 65 fastback V8, he'll get that price.
  • Redapple2 Love that year fastback. Is the auto tran rubbish?
  • Jeff S The question is how long will Ford offer the Mustang as a pony car? Dodge is sun setting the Challenger at the end of this year and it is doubtful if the Challenger will come back as an EV. Rumors are the Camaro name will be used on an EV and that will mostly likely be a crossover. There is not enough market for a Detroit muscle or pony car. It is sad to see not only the last of the cars like the Camaro and Challenger go but to see most cars go. Soon this site will have to change its name to The Truth About Trucks (TTAT).
  • Oberkanone Does GM build anything to compete with this? Does GM build any competent hybrids?