Nevada Governor Signs Tesla Tax Package Into Law

Cameron Aubernon
by Cameron Aubernon

A week after the announcement, and through two days of deliberation by the state legislature, Nevada governor Brian Sandoval signed into law September 11 the $1.25 billion tax package that won over Tesla enough to bring its Gigafactory to the Silver State.

Reno Gazette-Journal breaks down the complete package as follows:

  • $725 million: 20-year, 100 percent sales tax abatement
  • $332 million: 10-year, 100 percent property tax abatement
  • $120 million: Transferable tax credits
  • $75 million: $12,500/job transferable tax credits (up to 6,000 jobs)
  • $27 million: 10-year, 100 percent modified business tax abatement
  • $8 million: Discounted electricity rates for eight years

In addition, the state will buy Tahoe Reno Industrial Center’s main road, the USA Parkway, for $43 million, and will extend the road to U.S. Highway 50 at a cost yet to be determined.

Finally, the legislature had to agree to give Tesla and other EV manufacturers the right to directly sell their wares to customers in Nevada without going through the traditional dealership model.

In exchange, Tesla will provide $7.5 million annually to the state for education funding over the next five years beginning in 2018, as well as invest $3.5 billion in manufacturing equipment and real estate in Nevada.

Meanwhile, the insurance and film industries lost on their respective tax incentive programs as funds were siphoned into the Tesla deal. The former loses a $27 million/year credit that had been a mainstay for 40 years; the latter sees a hard-won $80 million/year credit meant for movie production over the next four years reduced to just $10 million/year.

As for economic impact, the state expects $100 billion over the next two decades, ranging from 6,500 employees making $25/hour assembling the battery packs meant for all of Tesla’s vehicles and others interested in them, to a 4 percent increase in the state’s gross domestic product.

Cameron Aubernon
Cameron Aubernon

Seattle-based writer, blogger, and photographer for many a publication. Born in Louisville. Raised in Kansas. Where I lay my head is home.

More by Cameron Aubernon

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 42 comments
  • Jim brewer Jim brewer on Sep 15, 2014

    I bet The education "credits" are the people that get sent to seminars or the University of Phoenix for this and tha. Probably spread over 10 or 15 years. Basically, an illusory press release benefit. Just a guess. Another press release feature is the astonishing 20 X multiplier effect of this investment, all in the state of Nevada alone. The highest multipliers I ever heard of are in the 5 X range. It so happens that the cost of the Medicaid expansion of O-Care in Nevada is slightly larger. So does that mean there's going to be 200 billion dollars of extra economic activity in Nevada alone between O-care and Elon Musk? OK it's gummint spending. Let's assume a measly 10X multiplier. 150 billion in new economic activity in Nevada? Remember, this is a state with an annual budget just a little over 5 billion. My point is that these economic projections reported in the newspaper don't pass the laugh test. They are pure, unadulterated bullshit. The gigafactory will supposedly cost Tesla $5 billion, but the first phase is 3 billion. What are the clawbacks if Tesla doesn't come through? You notice there's no mention of that. Remember, if Tesla goes belly up, a distinct possibility, given the riskiness of the venture, it won't even matter if they have clawbacks. P.S. Here's another word for "transferrable tax credits" It's called "cash"

    • See 3 previous
    • Drzhivago138 Drzhivago138 on Sep 16, 2014

      @EchoChamberJDM And they both had insane amounts of torque at 0 RPM!

  • Voyager Voyager on Sep 16, 2014

    Anyone who knows if the termination of the battery delivery deal with Toyota will affect the plant's prospects and perhaps even Tesla itself?

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next