Is The Nissan LEAF Worth The Green?

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

What happens when the subsidy is over?

This is a question that I tried to study in depth about a month ago when one of my friends had a 10 year old Toyota Prius that had seemingly lost it’s battery.

It turned out that he didn’t need a new car, or a new battery. A stray rodent had inflicted minimal harm to the wiring and his temporary search for a new ride quickly came and went.

However, I did some deep drilling for him one evening since his question was one with more unknowns than the typical car purchase. He wanted a LEAF, new our used, as his next car.

What shocked the hell out of me is that the numbers may indeed work… new or used.

The word may is a key operative term here…

Before I delve into the deep ocean blue of numbers crunching, let me offer each of you three (four!) simple questions.

1. Do you live in one of those wonderful states that offers a $5000 state subsidy for buying a LEAF?

2. Does your income enable you to make use of all the federal and state tax credits? And do you have excellent credit?

3. Are you willing to deal with an electric car that will be losing about 20% to 25% of it’s range by the time it reaches 100,000 miles.

If you answered no to any one of these (four!) three questions, then do not buy the LEAF under any circumstances unless you are willing to “invest” in the electric technology that powers it.

So as for those 10% of you who are left (no it’s 5% you cheating used car selling bastard!), let’s go a bit deeper.

If you are only looking for a short-term deal and pure numbers are guiding your decision, then lease. The numbers between a two year lease and a three year lease change based on whatever special packages and bogus fees are ordained by the local dealership. These will likely include a $595 acquisition fee, a $395 disposition fee, a $250 documentation fee (this is an estimate based on TrueCar data for all 50 states), and about $2000 worth in states taxes, title transaction costs, registration costs, and the two lukewarm sodas you get to drink while the general manager of the dealership gets to plan for a weekend run to Vegas thanks to all the fake expenses he gets to collect.

Not to worry though, because the deal also enables you to screw take advantage of every subsidy known to these electric car programs. Federal Tax Credits. State Tax Credits. Possible Charging System Subsidies. Lower Rates For Your Electric Usage. HOV Lane Stickers. Truth be told, buying a Nissan LEAF is the closest most individuals will ever get to enjoying the benefits of becoming their very own large corporation. All these credits amount to over $13,000 in real world cost and to top it all off, you get to thumb your nose at the oil companies.

Once you throw auto insurance to the mix, your real world costs on an annual basis will likely run around $360 a month, or just $12.00 a day, and that includes everything. Fuel, Insurance, Maintenance Costs, Tax Credit Reductions… it’s a steal of a deal in every sense of the term if you can pass through all the hoops and ignore the monetary flesh wounds of your fellow Americans who now pay $25 a day according to the American Automobile Association.

Typical car owner losing vital limbs thanks to the lobbying efforts of the Nissan Motor Company

The spreadsheet doesn’t publish well at a site like TTAC. But long story short, I was a financial analyst my first two years out of college and I’m happy to share it with anyone who has a remote interest in all the numbers. Feel free to email at steve.lang@thetruthaboutcars.com.

Now as for the buying side, there were four (three!) unusual findings.

1. The running costs of a LEAF, if you opt for the $100 a month battery guarantee, is roughly equivalent to a 10 year old Nissan Sentra.

2. Insurance costs between a LEAF and that Sentra worked out to only about a 13% difference. $1132 for the LEAF vs $1010 for the Sentra according to my insurer, USAA.

3. If you avoid the dealership’s service department like the plague and buy a $5 turkey baster for your brake fluid servicing, the LEAF will likely be cheaper to operate than a 10 year old beater Sentra.

There is one area of variance that came into play in my calculations. Battery life and the climate’s impact on it.

If you live in an area with searing heat and unusually cold winters, say, like Atlanta these last few months, your battery pack will likely wear out a bit faster than the owner who enjoys a constant mild temperature year round. Once you or Nissan decide to discontinue the battery program, you may be living on borrowed time. So you have to figure out at what point you are willing to make that trade.

Then again, you may find in the near future that replacement parts are cheap enough elsewhere, and that this battery lease program will not be needed going forward. As a long-time owner of a 1st gen Insight and the first two generations of the Prius, I can attest to that outcome coming true more often than not.

So if it were my money, or the money subsidized to me by my fellow Americans, I would recommend the following.

1. If you buy the LEAF new, opt for the battery replacement program right before the vehicle hits the 5 year / 60,000 mark.

2. Replace the pack after the first go round, which will likely offer increased range and longevity, and then stop paying for the battery lease program.

3. Start prospecting for replacement parts if you absolutely do plan on keeping the LEAF past the 12 to 15 year mark.

A one to two year old Nissan LEAF is right now running the gamut of between $16,000 for a non-CPO LEAF with about 35,000 miles, to $22,000 for one that has less than 10,000 miles and is eligible for Nissan’s Certified Pre-Owned program.

That’s quite a range. However, it comes down to this.

A LEAF costs about as much to operate as a 10 year old Sentra that has 120,000 miles. I spent an insane amount of time trying to figure this out, and now that I finally have done so, I’m going to let my fellow enthusiasts buy a 1st gen Miata and forget they ever read this tome to automotive androgyny.

THE END…


Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 61 comments
  • Mnm4ever Mnm4ever on Feb 27, 2014

    Great article, and I have been saying this all along... looking at the EV as an appliance or a service rather than a vehicle can make sense to many people. Around here the 0-down lease deal works out to just under $300/mo, and we don't have any state tax benefit for EVs in Florida, just the federal subsidy. I don't think it's fair to include insurance in the mix because that varies widely by location and driver. My insurance quote for the Leaf was right at $300 for 6 months, so still close to your estimate. Since most all leases are figured at 1000/mo of driving, that's a great number to use to calculate the fuel comparison. So our Honda Civic is leased at $230/mo with nothing down too. I spend right about 90/mo on gas, depending on how much gas is going for, and it is driven typically 900 miles per month, so we are getting all our mileage use out of it. The insurance runs $360 every 6 months, so all together I am out $380/mo total running costs per month. But... I have no range anxiety, and if I don't drive it for whatever reason I don't have to buy gas. The way I see it, the sweet spot for an EV lease is $250/mo or less with nothing down. I have a few friends who drive trucks or Wranglers, they spend $200-300/mo on gas alone. If they could commute in an EV instead they would come very close to breaking even just for not driving the truck every day. Of course insurance would throw those numbers off, but when you get into reduced wear and tear, higher resale values over the same time due to less miles on the car, etc, it would be a close tradeoff.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Mar 21, 2014

    Just a comment on the insurance side: In my opinion, USAA is a poor carrier to use for estimating insurance rates. Because of USAA's market composition, it affects their loss history and that finds its way into its actuarial decisions and rate-making. This is good for you as someone who qualifies for USAA, but it means that the rate gap between the Leaf and the Sentra is likely to be different for people who are stuck with the general market.

    • See 1 previous
    • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Mar 23, 2014

      @JPWhite I never said I didn't like USAA. In fact, the only way I don't "like" them is in the professional sense that when I was servicing policies for a competitor, not once in 8 years could I beat USAA's rates. I actually respect them quite a bit, my friends who use USAA have no complaints and I like the way they represent themselves as an advertiser. Although you're generally correct in that BI and PD coverage make up the bulk of the cost, that isn't always the case (I know some zip codes in Florida where UM/UIM coverage is actually higher than BI). The risk profile of the vehicle usually begins with data from POLK in the form of vehicle "symbols" which represent their compiled data on a particular year/make/model/engine, and if that was the beginning and ending of it, then it wouldn't matter if the customer carried USAA or Nationwide. However, many carriers use POLK data only as a basis and then develop custom symbols based on their own experience -- like the carrier I used to do frontline underwriting for. By their very nature, these modified symbols will be a reflection of the carrier's customer base. Although each carrier's customer base will be a little bit different based on market segmentation and tiering model, your Nationwides and GEICOs and State Farms all pull from the same universe of customers. USAA's military service requirement means that they have a much smaller and very specific universe of customers to pull from, who tend to have a better loss ratio than the general public, similar to companies with programs which cater specifically to pilots. As I don't have access to USAA's rating rules I can't say whether they use straight POLK symbols, whether they modify POLK symbols, or have their own proprietary rating mechanism. I just wanted to point out the possibility that Steven's insurance experience MIGHT not generalize well because he isn't using a company which sells to the general public. That having been said, I agree with your assertion that the BI/PD coverage profile between the Sentra and Leaf is going to be similar. But the collision coverage profile is based in part on cost of repair, both for parts and for labor, and if you have a vehicle that requires special tools or training to work on, that's going to be considered.

  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
  • Cprescott As long as they infest their products with CVT's, there is no reason to buy their products. Nissan's execution of CVT's is lackluster on a good day - not dependable and bad in experience of use. The brand has become like Mitsubishi - will sell to anyone with a pulse to get financed.
Next