Capsule Review: 2014 Kia Soul !

Winston Braithwaite
by Winston Braithwaite
capsule review 2014 kia soul

Winter can be stern and humorless. Into the frozen fray trundled a visitor from California. I told the 2014 Kia Soul that it was out of place. Then a whole bunch of snow fell. The Soul’s chipper personality replied “no worries, brah.” With only all-season tires, I was worried, though. Without winter tires, any-wheel drive may be inadequate, proper equipment really does matter. The California license plate peeked out as if to say “Let’s crush some dendrites.”

Turns out the Kia Soul is more than just a whimsical set of wheels. See, whimsy is a tricky thing. It’s a subset of humor, and humor requires a deft touch. The joke is funny when it bends. Go too far, though, and it breaks. Nobody laughs when the funny breaks.

The Kia Soul has been a practical personality box since 2009, and it’s all-new for 2014. You might have to look closely to spot the changes, and that’s good. The original Soul was charming and stretched the gags just enough. In contrast, the Scion xB, this segment’s pioneer, had already lost the plot by 2009.

The example of the xB’s second-generation Thorazine shuffle hung ominously over the 2014 Kia Soul. Would Kia mess up its cheeky little hedgehog-inspired dumpling?

If styling permanence works for the Porsche 911, why can’t it work for the Kia Soul? In fact, it works quite well. It’s hard to be unhappy with so much style for so little money. The base Soul will run you $14,900. I was driving the Exclaim trim, and it turns out the price of my totally-loaded Soul was $27,000. At that price, there’s lots of alternatives, but nothing is quite like the Kia Soul.

Like MINI or the Volkswagen Beetle or even the Jeep Wrangler, the 2014 Soul hews tight to the look established by its predecessor. Park them next to each other, though, and the 2014 Soul instantly makes the original look old. The styling of the new Soul is further refined and smoothed out. Kia makes it sound like there’s a bunch of the Track’ster concept in the new car, but it’s mostly just details like the lower fascia, grille and floating body-color panel in the tailgate. The 2014 Soul looks mostly like the 2009 Soul, though it sits on its wider, longer wheelbase with more visual authority. The stoplights are the easiest tell, if you’re a car-spotter.

We are in a new age of “Lower! Longer! Wider!” but the dimensional growth is welcome in the 2014 Soul. The back gate is wider, which leads to a larger cargo area. There’s more legroom for both front and rear seats, more front headroom, a lower hip point and reduced step-in height, adding up to a Soul that’s friendlier and more useful. The 2014 Soul turned out to be surprisingly excellent in the snow, even on the all-season tires the standard 18” alloys it wears, so it’s not useless outside of Cali.

Think of the Soul as the 2000s version of the Honda Civic Wagovan or Nissan Stanza Wagon. It’s usefully boxy, economical, easy to get in and out of and easy to drive. For something on a small 101.2” wheelbase, the 24.2 cubic feet of cargo space behind the rear seat is impressively large. Fold that second row down and there’s 61.3 cubic feet of room.

Being loaded up with features that used to be luxury car stuff probably didn’t hurt my impression, either. I sat on ventilated leather. Everyone had seat heaters, front and rear. Automatic HID projector headlights burrowed through the swirl of the storm, and I was directed by the navigation system. Above my head, a giant panoramic moonroof gave me an underside view of the glacier on the roof, the Infinity audio system was plenty entertaining, though the pulsing Hamster-Nightclub interior lights were doused quickly. The top-spec infotainment system was easy to use, and the rest of the ergonomics in the Soul are good because they don’t try to be cutesy. The dash speakers that look like coasters are a little weird, though.

Even without the list of equipment that’s longer than a Dickens story, the Soul would be a pleaser. The base engine for the Soul is a 1.6 liter DOHC direct-injected four cylinder with a healthy-for-its-size 130 hp and a slightly disappointing 118 lb-ft of torque. It’s probably nice enough, like listening to the neighbor kid’s well-practiced rendition of Sing, Sing, Sing, but the Plus and Exclaim get a 2.0 liter that’s Benny Goodman backed by Gene Krupa, instead. (Hey, you carped about my Led Zeppelin reference…) That’s an exaggeration, but the 2.0 liter has 164 hp, 151 lb-ft, and a high 11.5:1 compression ratio. It’s a snappy little number, for sure.

What kinda harshes the buzz is the fact that the only way to get a six-speed manual is to go with the small engine. The six-speed automatic that’s paired with the 2.0 liter is a pretty decent consolation prize, though. It’s well matched to the engine and shifts well, though it exhibits some of the pulsating wonkiness under hard acceleration that’s an apparent trademark behavior of this Hyundai design.

The Soul is perhaps the most vivid example of Kia’s learning curve. Kias used to look great on paper, with lots of features and equipment for less money than the competition, but you could always count on them being short on integration. In less than a decade, that’s been completely reversed. The 2014 Soul drives like a car designed, assembled, and tuned by people who actually spoke to each other.

The last piece of the puzzle was suspension tuning, and Kia has figured out how to make the seemingly-dowdy combo of MacPherson struts in the front and a torsion-beam rear axle ride with compliance and yet handle with some spirit, too. Other style-boxes can’t pull that off. The xB is hopelessly uninteresting to drive, and the Nissan Cube is as soft as nursing home pudding. It’s like Kia looked at what they had, realized that the first-generation VW GTI managed to do pretty damn well with the same basic parts, and got inspired.

I’d still have preferred to try the Soul in the snow on winter tires, but on its 18” alloys and surprisingly wide 235/45 Kumho Nexens it cut through like a champ. I’m also a little surprised that there’s not an all-wheel drive version of the Soul, because I think it would sell like moonshine in a dry county. I’d have an alternative to the Subaru Forester to recommend to people, and that’s something I dearly desire. On the other hand, there’s a new Soul EV, which I can’t wait to get my hands on.

The Soul is aptly named. It’s a boxy little car with a bunch of personality. In this time of bland-but-pretty, rare is the car that both stands out for its styling and delivers some fun for everyone at a price normal people can swing. Get down with your bad self, Kia.

Join the conversation
2 of 108 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Mar 18, 2014

    At or near base trim, this cutie-pie small MPV makes a case for itself. But 27k? That will buy you a Ford C-Max Hybrid SE with a couple options, and the Ford will be quieter, smoother, quicker, and get much better MPG than the Kia. Why would anyone buy the Rio-based Soul at that price point? Styling, maybe. Of all the small MPVs, only the Soul gets it just right, looking like a cardboard box styled by Tonka and painted in giggly colors like Metallic Kermit the Frog. FUN! The Cube is wacky too, but without that Tonka element to make it more acceptable to dudes. The Fiat 500L falls even further of the mark, more ungainly than cute. And the xB2 and C-Max are styled for adults, which is a mistake when styling a small MPV, which inherently is going to look like either a box or a potato...may as well make it a fun box or a fun potato!

  • Poes Poes on Aug 05, 2014

    Just purchased one, 14 Soul- Traded 09 Fit Sport w/paddle shifters AUTO Trans. 1- Fit mileage minder show anywhere from 30-42 MPG = DO the math when refueling = even 31-32 every-time regardless of what the avg states ! 2- Fit was fun, did every bit of 140 + speed w/ 1/4 -1/3 peddle to go *no-where near REDLINING... took it to Germany to ride the OPEN ROAD ! 2A- Never floated and stuck to the road like it was a magnet/even changing lanes... *that is when I Knew it was everything they said and more. + the MPG was always the same =peddle to the floor or just taking it easy, always 30-31 mpg + do the math people ! 2B- tires lasted 63k mostly HGWY MILES -still good but had 2 tires plugged -would have passed -but would have needed changing withing 3kmiles, and I wasn't taking a chance -having a blow-out ! 3- +'s -mileage/ reliability = no issues for starting or leaving me stuck, handled very well -at any speed, had enough room to put a large box containing a lg gas grill with "seats down", people bringing the grill box out said NO it'll never fit-HA -I could have purchased coolers and stuck them in. Also, I like how the seats stayed up when using the passenger floor for every day carry stuff instead of ruining the seats. 4- Negatives= 4a- paying out the WAZOO for that tiny air-filter/ also the cabin Air Filter "learned to clean it and stick a Fabreeze or other dryer sheet on it to keep car smelling fresh. 4b- windshields give great view 'but also are a BIG TARGET FOR STONES and kids bouncing basket balls off the roof and other cars - cracked the windshield and I loathe the drivers side larger than life wiper blade that does not like snow loads , shakes bad after a few years-think the motor was straining to clear the windshield. 4c- one 3 inch ding on hatchback cost over$500, 3 diff estimates all in $10-30 range. + roof dented when kids hit it w/basket ball -dented and broke windshield $2k -$2300 for repairs. 4d- really liked the car , but I needed something easier to get in / out every day commuter- I have a car like that for Sunday back road Rally drives and can't walk well the next week from one day of driving. I just got tired of Hondas' parts -not to mention the oil changes, $30 + for 3.8 qts of semi SYN and filter and other parts. Yes I miss it already for the GETUP AND GO ****NOW the $million $ ?/ANSWER, why the 2014 Soul, BASE W/ 6speed manual trans ????????????????? 1 $price- got a good trading for a 5 yr old FIT with new tires- "self keeps thinking -should have waited until SEPT /OCT when the 15's are rolling out. BUT...I wanted a manual base and in the color I wanted and I was not driving 100's of miles to have dealers play. games..."they still try this-espec if they know you drove 2-3 hrs. Found 3 local dealers- let them shoot it out and when the smoke cleared I got what I wanted and YES -if I had patience I may have saved another $1500. on a 14 -but may not have caught a manual trans in the color I wanted. 2. I was impressed w/ the highway noise level/ the smooth shifting of the 6 speed manual-"NO IT IS NO WHERE NEAR THEQUICKNESS OF TE FIT, but I'm not in a Road Rally every day- its a commuter car, and yes I could have purchased a RAT CAR , But I have an addiction to cars like some people / OPP SEX buy $300 shoes and purses, or my gender that spends $hundreds on fishing/hunting /camping gear etc. 3. I was impressed w/ the electronics and leg room-Being over 6'1" +, w/ the seat back I couldn't push the clutch peddle in all the way-more room than most need and comfortable. + **NOTE THIS -YOU CAN NOW GET REMOTE START IN MANUAL TRANS CARS 'for warm up in the WINTER... GOT IT ! Yes it has plastic and came w/ ?HUB CAPS,

  • Jeff S Corey--We know but we still want to give our support to you and let TTAC know that your articles are excellent and better than what the typical articles are.
  • Jeff S A sport utility vehicle or SUV is a car classification that combines elements of road-going passenger cars with features from off-road vehicles, such as raised ground clearance and four-wheel drive.There is no commonly agreed-upon definition of an SUV and usage of the term varies between countries. Thus, it is "a loose term that traditionally covers a broad range of vehicles with four-wheel drive." Some definitions claim that an SUV must be built on a light truck chassis; however, broader definitions consider any vehicle with off-road design features to be an SUV. A [url=]crossover SUV[/url] is often defined as an SUV built with a unibody construction (as with passenger cars), however, the designations are increasingly blurred because of the capabilities of the vehicles, the labelling by marketers, and electrification of new models.The predecessors to SUVs date back to military and low-volume models from the late 1930s, and the four-wheel drive station wagons and carryalls that began to be introduced in 1949. The 1984 [url=]Jeep Cherokee (XJ)[/url] is considered to be the first SUV in the modern style. Some SUVs produced today use unibody construction; however, in the past, more SUVs used body-on-frame construction. During the late 1990s and early 2000s, the popularity of SUVs greatly increased, often at the expense of the popularity of large [url=]sedans[/url] and station wagons.More recently, smaller SUVs, mid-size, and crossovers have become increasingly popular. SUVs are currently the world's largest automotive segment and accounted for 45.9% of the world's passenger car market in 2021. SUVs have been criticized for a variety of environmental and safety-related reasons. They generally have poorer fuel efficiency and require more resources to manufacture than smaller vehicles, contributing more to climate change and environmental degradation. Between 2010 and 2018 SUVs were the second largest contributor to the global increase in carbon emissions worldwide. Their higher center of gravity increases their risk of rollovers. Their larger mass increases their stopping distance, reduces visibility, and increases damage to other road users in collisions. Their higher front-end profile makes them at least twice as likely to kill pedestrians they hit. Additionally, the psychological sense of security they provide influences drivers to drive less cautiously. the above definition of SUV any vehicle that is not a pickup truck if it is enclosed, doesn't have a trunk, and is jacked up with bigger tires. If the green activists adhere to this definition of what an SUV is there will be millions of vehicles with flat tires which include HRVs, Rav4s, CRVs, Ford Escapes, Buick Encores, and many of compact and subcompact vehicles. The green movement is going to have to recruit millions of new followers and will be busy flattening millions of tires in the US and across the globe. Might be easier to protest.
  • Sckid213 I actually do agree that most Nissans are ultimately junk. (I also think many BMWs are also). I was talking challenging the 3 in terms of driving dynamics. Agree all were failures in sales.
  • THX1136 More accurately said, we are seeing exponential growth in the manufacturing capabilities in this market. Unless, of course, all those vehicles are sold with customers waiting until more a produced so they can buy. Indeed, there are certainly more EVs being purchased now than back in 2016. Is demand outstripping manufacturing? Maybe or maybe not. I sincerely don't know which is why I ask.
  • ToolGuy The page here (linked in the writeup) is ridiculously stupid, seriously stupid, e.g., A) Not sure that particular Volvo is killing the planet as quickly as some other vehicles we might choose. B) A Juke is "huge"??? C) The last picture shows a RAV4 Hybrid?