Supply Chain Bottleneck Due In Five Years According to Study

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

Bottlenecks are bad things to experience. Around 70,000 years ago, the Toba supervolcano eruption reduced humanity to anywhere from 1,000 to 10,000 breeding pairs — thus creating a genetic bottleneck — alongside a global cooling event concurrent with the Last Glacial Period.

For automakers in the United States and their North American supply chain, their Toba event is coming.

A study from Detroit consulting firm Harbour Results, Inc. warns that in five years’ time, the North American auto industry will experience a 40 percent bottleneck in their ability to screw together the cars and trucks we so love, due to falling short $6 billion in tooling capacity. As it stands, the industry will need $15.2 billion in tooling each year to avoid this fate; current industry capacity is $9.3 billion.

The issue isn’t helped by the fact that there are only 750 tool shops in North America, down a third from their peak in the late 1990s in part due to the global recession. On top of this, the average age of a toolmaker in each of the shops hovers around 52, with few new toolmakers coming up in the ranks to replace them; Harbour Results’ CEO Laurie Harbour states the training needed to bring aboard a toolmaker takes six years to complete.

On the other side, the automakers are planning to introduce 154 new models between now and 2018, a third alone coming down the ramps in 2014. With each new model requiring around 3,000 new tools to screw them all together, if not more due to increasing complexity, capacity can only continue to be strained.

Along with the other issues at hand, there’s also the fact that the automakers producing their goods in North America prefer to keep their business inside the NAFTA zone, ignoring Chinese toolmakers who could make the tooling needed quickly and cheaply. That said, Chinese and German toolmakers are planning to set up shop in the economic zone soon in an effort to encourage automakers to reach out for their tools once the latter opts to remove their blinders.

Another potential cause of the coming automotive production bottleneck? Disasters such as the Marl Chemical Park explosion in 2012, the Fukushima earthquake and tsunami in 2011, or a similar incident like the Lac-Mégantic derailment this year.

The only solution to all of these scenarios, in the words of Charlie Sheen, is for automakers to plan better by finding where the bottlenecks could occur, and promptly finding ways to avoid them, whether it’s through shifting key component manufacturing elsewhere or simplification of their latest and greatest.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 29 comments
  • Dimwit Dimwit on Nov 14, 2013

    Now you know what's behind efforts like VW's MQB platform engineering. A vastly reduced overhead for all the models they want to produce because of standardization. If the UAW/CAW were smart, they would be holding apprenticeship classes on a regular basis to get new members into the fold instead of trying to force assembly plants to unionize.

    • Tresmonos Tresmonos on Nov 14, 2013

      The majority of tooling is out of reach of the UAW workforce. Stamping dies are about the only tooling the OEM skilled trades work on. And man are those guys worth their pay.

  • Joe65688619 My last new car was a 2020 Acura RDX. Left it parked in the Florida sun for a few hours with the windows up the first day I had it, and was literally coughing and hacking on the offgassing. No doubt there is a problem here, but are there regs for the makeup of the interiors? The article notes that that "shockingly"...it's only shocking to me if they are not supposed to be there to begin with.
  • MaintenanceCosts "GLX" with the 2.slow? I'm confused. I thought that during the Mk3 and Mk4 era "GLX" meant the car had a VR6.
  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
Next