Aston Martin & AMG Announce Technical Partnership, Daimler to Buy Up to 5% Stake in AM

TTAC Staff
by TTAC Staff

As part of an announced technical partnership between AMG, the performance subsidiary of Mercedes-Benz and Britain’s Aston Martin, Daimler will buy up to a 5% interest in the luxury performance car maker. The agreement will give AM “significant access” to the technical resources of both AMG and its parent. Aston Martin will use those resources to develop V8 engines and have access to Mercedes Benz’s electronic architecture and components.

Aston Martin product development director Ian Minards said, “We have selected AMG specifically as the basis for this powertrain development process.”

On behalf of AMG, the performance brand’s chief, Ola Kaellenius said that the technical partnership is “proof of AMG’s technological and performance expertise, and a real win-win situation for both sides.”

Aston Martin’s engines are currently supplied by Ford, which formerly owned AM, at a Cologne, Germany plant. Aston Martin’s V12 engine is based on the architecture of Ford’s Duratec V6 engine. Aston’s V8 is a hand assembled version of the Jaguar AJ V8 engine, a practice that started when Ford owned both of those companies.

Automotive analysts say that the deal helps Aston Martin avoid the substantial costs of not just engine development, but also electronic systems, which have become increasingly important in the auto industry.

For Daimler, it gets to amortize some AMG costs and gives it a foothold to take control of Aston Martin later should its current investors want to pull out. Moody’s currently rates Aston Martin at B3, non-investment grade. Last year, the Investindustrial group of Italy bought a 37.5% share in the company for $241 million, through a capital increase negotiated with majority owner Investment Dar, a sovereign-wealth fund of Kuwait.

Aston Martin is currently the only premier luxury car maker that is not owned by a larger automotive group. In January, Aston Martin announced plans to invest spend $765 over the next four years to keep pace with VAG owned Bentley and Fiat owned Ferrari and Maserati. The UK company has had a rough go of it since the economic crisis of 2008, with a 9% drop in profits in 2012, and a 10% decline in sales, to ~3,800 cars.

So far, Daimler and Aston Martin have only signed a letter of intent, with definitive agreements to be inked later this year, pending regulatory approval. Daimler will buy the 5% stake in stages, depending on the progress of the technical partnership, and its stock will be non-voting shares.

TTAC Staff
TTAC Staff

More by TTAC Staff

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 25 comments
  • MBella MBella on Jul 27, 2013

    The concept of an Aston Martin powered by an AMG engine excites me. A Vantage with an AMG 157 twin turbo V8 would be pretty spectacular. A high end Aston with an AMG V12 would be astounding.

  • Ry_Trapp0 Ry_Trapp0 on Jul 28, 2013

    wow, seems to be quite a few MB appologists in here, "chrysler could NEVER do anything better than MB!!!" the truth is that, as has been alluded to, daimler absolutely and positively took what they could from chysler and left them for dead... http://www.allpar.com/neon/engineering.html http://www.autonews.com/article/20090216/ZZZ_SPECIAL/302169860#axzz2aK8oXWxo http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/29/AR2009042904327.html?hpid=artslot&sid=ST2009043001828 despite what all the keyboard warriors want to believe, chrysler was immensely successful during the 90's, while MB was struggling. daimler recovered MB with what they could get from chysler, then practically payed cerberus to take them.

    • See 2 previous
    • MBella MBella on Jul 29, 2013

      Not one of those articles says anything about Daimler "stealing Chrysler's advanced technology". Chrysler was on the brink of a complete financial disaster towards the late 90s, and they needed to be bought out. That huge one billion dollar stock pile of cash that Daimler "stole" from the company they paid 30 billion for. Yes when you buy a company you keep whatever good there is. The only thing Mercedes received was contacts with a few American domestic suppliers that they used to build the first generation ML.

  • MaintenanceCosts If only it had a hatch. The Model S is so much more practical, has similar performance in non-Plaid form, and is $20k more - and the $20k premium seems almost worth it just for the hatch.
  • Lorenzo I'm not surprised. They needed to drop the "four-door coupe", or as I call it, the Dove soap bar shape, and put a formal flat roof over the rear seats, to call it a sedan. The Legacy hasn't had decent back seat headroom since the 1990s, except for the wagons. Nobody wants to drive with granny in the front passenger seat!
  • Analoggrotto GM is probably reinventing it as their next electric.
  • Vatchy What is the difference between a car dealer and a drug dealer? Not much - you can end up dead using what they sell you. The real difference is that one is legal and one is not.
  • Theflyersfan Pros: Stick shift, turbo wagonExtra tires and wheelsBody is in decent shape (although picture shows a little rust)Interior is in decent shapeService records so can see if big $$$ is coming upCan handle brutal "roads" in Uganda, Rwanda, and Tanzania, although the spare wheels and tires will be needed. (See picture)Cons:Mileage is high Other Volvos on the site are going for less moneyAnyone's guess what an Ontario-driven in the winter vehicle looks like on the lift.Why wasn't the interior cleaned?Clear the stability control message please...Of course it needs to cross the border if it comes down here. She lowers the price a bit and this could be a diamond in the rough. It isn't brown and doesn't have a diesel, but this checks most TTAC wagon buyer boxes!
Next