Marchinonne's Flirt With New Chinese Jeep Partner Might Slow Down Jeep In China – Again

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Fiat might be looking for another Chinese joint venture partner to manufacture Jeeps, Fiat CEo Sergio Marchionne told Reuters. “In China we have a good partner, and we have the possibility to use a second one to develop Jeep,” Marchionne said.

Late to the Chinese market, Fiat established a JV with Guangzhou Automobile Group (GAC), a company that also has JVs with Toyota and Honda.

Chrysler wants to produce over 100,000 new Jeeps in China, :in a move that is key to Fiat’s goal of selling 300,000 vehicles annually in China by next year,” as Reuters says,

Marchionne told Reuters that Chrysler is not currently in talks with a partner for Jeep, but added that “there have been a number of expressions of interest.”

An overseas automaker can pair up with up to two Chinese joint venture partners, but not more. The approval process is long and byzantine, and is far from guaranteed, if Saab, Hummer, and Subaru are an example. If Marchionne wants to produce 100,000 Jeeps in China by next year, then it is much too late to cast about for new joint venture partners, and doing so could slow down a very promising relaunch of Jeep in China, which, frankly, should have been undertaken much earlier.

BAIC’s B40

SUVs are one of the most rapid-growing segments in China, and Jeep is a very strong brand in the Middle Kingdom. Jeep, when owned by AMC, was the first company to start a JV in China. Established in 1984, it actually predated the venerable Volkswagen-SAIC JV by a few months. In the hands of Chrysler, then DaimlerChrysler, then Chrysler again, the Chinese JV deteriorated from neglect. Finally, in 2009. Chrysler pulled out.

Jeep better get its act together in China. “Beijing’s Jeeps look better than Jeep’s” wrote Chinacartimes after looking at BAIC’s brutish B40. Later, the website reported that the “forthcoming Jeep Cherokee really doesn’t seem to do anything for Chinese consumers.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Wheeler Wheeler on Jun 10, 2013

    The Beijing Jeeps may look good on the floor of the exhibition center, but in recent years they have yet to go beyond the display stage, into production. So there's no competition from there to worry about. BAIC currently seems preoccupied with banging out its line of Saab-based sedans, so the timing for Fiat's Jeep is right.

  • Bobman Bobman on Jun 10, 2013

    It's been quite some time since we've had any further news on this. This could just be Sergio's way of sending a message to their current partners indicating that they have other options. Who knows, perhaps negotiations have bogged down on cost sharing and technology ownership. Jeep is truly a jewel in Fiat/Chrysler's crown. Sergio needs to play his best cards wisely.

  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
  • FreedMike I don't get the business case for these plug-in hybrid Jeep off roaders. They're a LOT more expensive (almost fourteen grand for the four-door Wrangler) and still get lousy MPG. They're certainly quick, but the last thing the Wrangler - one of the most obtuse-handling vehicles you can buy - needs is MOOOAAAARRRR POWER. In my neck of the woods, where off-road vehicles are big, the only 4Xe models I see of the wrangler wear fleet (rental) plates. What's the point? Wrangler sales have taken a massive plunge the last few years - why doesn't Jeep focus on affordability and value versus tech that only a very small part of its' buyer base would appreciate?
  • Bill Wade I think about my dealer who was clueless about uConnect updates and still can't fix station presets disappearing and the manufacturers want me to trust them and their dealers to address any self driving concerns when they can't fix a simple radio?Right.
Next