What Is Happening To Toyota, Honda, Nissan In China, The Same Can Happen To GM
Buried In the depths of General Motor’s quarterly results is a routine litany of negative factors that could severely hamper the company’s future. One of them is “Significant changes in economic, political and market conditions in China.” GM intently monitors what is happening to Japanese brands in China, and it has more reason to watch with worries than with glee. What is happening to Toyota, Honda, and Nissan right now could just as easily happen to GM. The Japanese might shake off the troubles – Japanese makers have seen worse in the very recent past. GM would be brought to its knees by a boycott of American cars in China. Quite possibly, one of the reasons behind the whole anti-Japanese exercise is to say “look what could happen to you.” Government Motors finds itself at the mercy of China.
Market share by country, passenger vehicles, w/o SUV
Change can comes sudden in China: In the beginning of the year, the most bought cars in China carried Japanese brands. Six weeks after anti-Japanese tensions flared up in China in September over the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands the market share of all Japanese brands in China was decimated to a size a little better than that of France.
Nobody knows how long it will take to get back to normal. Observers are convinced it won’t be next month, and it could take well into next year. As quickly as flames were stoked and extinguished last September, the heat can be turned up again. And is does not have to be just Japan that can be on the receiving end.
Today, all three Japanese majors reported the impact of the anti-Japanese demonstrations and boycotts in November. After cutting sales in half in October, the impact has lessened somewhat in November, but it is still severe. Nissan and Honda lost nearly 30 percent of their sales in November, Toyota gave up 22 percent. The losses are most painful for Nissan, which has the highest exposure to China. Around a quarter of its global sales are in the Middle Kingdom.
We should not feel too comfortable in the thought that Japan and China are arch enemies, and it won’t happen to America.
Those invoking Japanese atrocities during World War II forget that Chinese troops fought against Americans in Korea, and at least by proxy in Vietnam.
Just yesterday, Beijing branded a US-Japan security treaty “a product of the Cold War” after Washington reaffirmed its commitment to Japan. There is plenty else that could trigger outrage in China. The Chinese are fiercely protective of their sovereignty, which sometimes clashes with meddlesome American politics that know now boundaries.
A week ago, Washington complained that China’s currency remains undervalued, but stopped short of branding the country a currency manipulator, an act that could trigger far greater repercussions from China than Japan buying a few rocks in the East China sea to keep them from falling into the hands of a firebrand right-wing Tokyo Governor who could have installed a helicopter base and a troop of Tokyo’s Metropolitan Police on the islets.
It is no accident that the Treasury report on China manipulating its currency or not, originally scheduled for October, was delayed until after the elections.
America has been engaged in a low level trade war with China since President Obama had to express gratitude to the unions for his first term election. GM quickly became collateral damage of this trade war. Tariffs enacted by China to retaliate against America’s punitive tariffs against low cost Chinese tires were carefully crafted to hit GM. Exports of Cadillacs to China dropped as a result, and Chinese production of the brand was accelerated.
General Motors would be the logical and most vulnerable target of anti-American riots in China, should they happen. GM is more dependent on China than any American company, much more so than any Japanese carmaker. Chrysler has zero exposure to China. Ford is just getting into the game.
GM sells more cars in China than in the U.S. In the first nine months of the year, 30 percent of GM’s global sales were in China. Worldwide, Only Volkswagen has similar exposure to the Chinese market as GM, and it has seen visa to executives delayed and parts stuck in customs after Frau Merkel only had tea with the Dalai Lama. Ever since,Germany treads very carefully with China.
In the first nine months of the year, GM’s revenue in China was $24.2 billion, and its net income was $2.3 billion, at least according to the documents filed with the SEC. In China. GM has a profit margin close to 10 percent, globally, it is around 4 percent. The true profits, generated by licensing, parts sales etc. are most likely higher.
Unlike its Japanese peers, GM is not known for coping well with a crisis. As fragile as GM’s financial house still is, a few cars smashed and dealerships torched in China in front of cameras, amplified by Youku and Weibo in China, Twitter and Youtube worldwide, could decimate GM.
Think it can’t happen, think China and America are tied together like evil Siamese twins? Don’t be so sure. China is Japan’s largest trading partner. Nearly 20 percent of Japanese exports last year were sold to mainland China, compared to 15.3 percent exported to the U.S. Japan is China’s third-largest foreign direct investor and fourth-largest importer. The anti-Japanese riots did hurt several companies owned by the Chinese Central government. A boycott of GM would hurt only a company owned by Shanghai’s government.
What happened in September in China, and what is still happening to Japanese car sales in China, is a signal to America: See what could happen to you.
And in case nobody is paying attention, there was another signal. During the height of the anti-Japanese riots, a group of protesters marched to the American embassy in Beijing, perfectly timed with the arrival of U.S. Ambassador Gary Locke’s car. The car was pelted with bottles, the American flag was ripped off the car. Watch what happened. Police (blue) was unable or too few to be effective. After some hesitations, paramilitary police (olive) intervened, the Ambassador’s car could speed away. No mass arrests were reported, Chinese authorities expressed regret.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Alan I blame COVID, the chip shortage, container shortage and the war in Ukraine. This aggression is evident in normal daily driving of late.
- Alan $10 000 is a bit rich for a vehicle that most likely been flogged all its life, plus it's a VW. Lots of electrical gremlins live in them.
- Alan Mitsubishi, Hino and Izuzu trucks are quite common in Australia. Another factor that needs to be taken into account are the cheap Chinese trucks and vans that are entering the market in Australia and becoming more popular as reliability improves, with huge warranties. Businesses want the cheapest logistics. Plumbers, concreters, builders buy many of these in their lightest versions, around 2.5 tonne payload. Hino/Toyota could use the cheaper competitor in Mitsubishi as a competitor against the Chinese. You don't see too many of the Japanese/Asian trucks in the rural areas.
- 2ACL I think it's a good choice. The E89 didn't get respect due to its all-around focus when new, but it's aged well, and the N52/6HP combo is probably more fun and capable than it's given credit for.
- Wjtinfwb I can hear the ticking from here...
We will always remember Premier Chou En-lai. Where is today's Chou? A voice of moderation and conciliation through the wrath of party purges. Nixon in Caracas was staged the glass was smashed outwards...
Its a very real risk. Not just for GM but for VW as well. China does use their economy as a big stick. Besides that Japanese, Norwegian goods, Filipino agricultural products have also been punished recently for various political disputes. Chinese official media outlets have been warning that the US is "playing with fire" recently: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2012-12/04/content_15985077.htm http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2012-12/02/content_15978333.htm This comes as the US is officially putting the Senakaku/Diaoyou islands under US military protection in case of Chinese aggression via Senate passing the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act last week. Chinese aggression means a US military response. This also comes as Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage stating that the US is 'not neutral' when it comes to the islands disputes. “We’re not neutral when our ally is a victim of coercion or aggression or intimidation,” http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2012/11/29/u-s-not-neutral-about-japan-armitage-told-beijing/ The US can very easily be drawn into these political disputes, especially as the US is also supporting its allies in South East Asia. As China is also in disputes for 90% of the South China Seas. BUT I don't think the Chinese goverment would be foolish enough to orchestrate an anti-American riot any time soon. The Japanese are easy targets, America would not respond as passively as the Japanese. America wields much bigger sticks. GM has nothing to fear for now.