New York Times On GM's Fleecing Of Small Town America
In the end, the money that towns across America gave General Motors did not matter… G.M. walked away and, thanks to a federal bailout, is once again profitable. The towns have not been so fortunate, having spent scarce funds in exchange for thousands of jobs that no longer exist.
Timing is everything. The exhaustively researched and rather bleak article regarding the predatory impact of major corporations on small, relatively powerless local governments that appeared in the New York Times on Saturday certainly doesn’t fit in with the what’s-good-for-General-Motors-is-good-for-the-country-and-everything’s-great mantra chanted by much of the press prior to the Presidential election. Let’s not be cynical; perhaps this is a brave example of speaking truth to power, the American paper of record demanding more accountability and more fairness from a corporation which is still largely owned by the United States Government.
Regardless, this piece (brought to our attention by Editor Emeritus Ed Niedermeyer) is worth reading with attention. From its taxpayer-funded greenfield factories in Tennessee to Ypsilanti’s surely doomed lawsuit against it, the specter of the General twists and twirls throughout the entire narrative. It’s written from a point of view that is classic NYT: business should be under the thumb of all governmental entities, from city council to Star Chamber, and those businesses should be held completely liable for any negative effect on their hosting communities, even if said negative effect is a result of unforeseeable circumstances. There’s a unique sort of mindset expressed in counting tax deferments as equal to lost income — that’s a lot like buying a set of work boots to get a job and then complaining that your boss just took the cost of those boots out of your pocket. It’s also somewhat disturbing to see the Times suggest, even obliquely, that collusion between governments to reduce tax incentives might be desirable.
Those minor quibbles aside, however, the article makes a solid point. A lot of communities spent a lot of money on General Motors, only to see their investments discarded and destroyed by a national government which absolved the debts, gave the UAW a seat made of investors’ bones on the board and told the city councils of the Midwest and elsewhere to go pound sand. Big government and big business hand in hand, crushing the opposition. There used to be a word for that, you know.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Inside Looking Out This is actually the answer to the question I asked not that long ago.
- Inside Looking Out Regarding "narrow windows" - the trend is that windows will eventually be replaced by big OLED screens displaying some exotic place or may even other planet.
- Robert I have had 4th gen 1996 model for many years and enjoy driving as much now as when I first purchased it - has 190 hp variant with just the right amount of power for most all driving situations!
- ToolGuy Meanwhile in Germany...
- Donald More stuff to break god I love having a nanny in my truck... find a good tuner and you can remove most of the stupid stuff they add like this and auto park when the doors open stupid stuff like that
Thank you Jack for reiterating what I've been saying for years about RenCen's continued utter contempt for rural America, ironically enough the Detroit 3's historically most loyal customer base in N.A. I must say you put it a little more succinctly than I ever have. If this isn't a case for the imports to further advance into this often overlooked market and win over Small-town, USA, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS. Having talked to some 'good old boys' (I.e. the Chevy/Mopar/FoMoCo or nothing crowd) while deer hunting in Northern MN recently, I feared rolling up to the hunting shack in my Accent, but the guys were very accepting.. This will never happen, but if Honda made a proper BOF Ridgeline, at least among those I talked to, they'd give it a chance up in the hinterlands, seems these guys are just as sick of the General as any suburban hipster.
"It’s also somewhat disturbing to see the Times suggest, even obliquely, that collusion between governments to reduce tax incentives might be desirable." Absolutely, because business would never lobby collectively for tax incentives or tax breaks. I read it on the Chamber of Commerce website.