Opel Labor Leader: Abandoning Opel Means Abandoning Europe
November 13th, 2012 8:38 AM
Share
Opel’s German unions want a deal with management before Christmas, Opel works council Chairman Wolfgang Schaefer-Klug told Reuters in an interview. Here the cliff notes:
- Does not believe in Ford-style closures, expects the cuts to be “far milder.”
- Says Opel management is not looking to close any other German plant than Bochum.
- Offers to shorten work week to cushion downturn.
- Mokka should be built in Europe regardless of Korean impact.
- Says GM board members that see Opel as dead weight are not in majority.
- Says if GM gives up Opel, it will give up Europe.
Comments
Join the conversation
Abandoning Opel Means Abandoning Europe...” I agree with this remark, because Chevrolet will not fill the void in Europe if Opel goes under.
GM is not going to abandon Opel. They are making steady progress and expect to break even by mid decade. GM's top management has made it their biggest priority to fix opel. Progress would happen much faster if only the labor unions stopped living in fantasy land. Bochum closed by 2016 Shift reductions and product consolidations happening elsewhere. 2300 jobs already cut so far in 2012 and 300 more by years end, netting a fixed cost savings of $300 million in 2012 and $500 million in 2013. Opel has reduced inventory by 100,000 since Feb. Cut sales to low cost rental companies. Already boosted per-vehicle revenue in Europe by nearly $650 through repackaging options to attract buyers to higher-price models. 23 new models and 16 new engines by 2016 The Opel Mokka is a huge hit with 45,000 pre-orders GM is also looking to buy Ally Financial's EU operations for $4B. This will allow Opel buyers easy access to credit. Alliance with PSA to save a combined $2B in costs by 2015. It doesn't seem like GM will abandon Opel unless the labor leaders torpedo any attempts of a recovery. The labor unions seem to get it. Looks like they have accepted the closure of Bochum Assembly and have agreed to shift reductions at Eisenach. Mr Girsky and Ackerson are very capable businessmen and I have trust in their leadership to get Opel out this mess.
GM has been selling Daewoos as Chevrolets for years. I see no reason for them not to sell Daewoos as Opels as well.
Opel has many problems, that can't be argued. However, at the moment, their products aren't one of them, so ditching Opel in favour of rebranding the less competitive, less well regarded Chevrolet line up would prove troublesome. Chevrolet still has something of an image problem in Europe stemming from the first European Chevrolet products being nothing more than rebadged Daewoos (Matiz, Aveo, Lacetti, Tacuma) which were, at absolute best, no more than marginally competitive in their respective segments. This perception has begun to change recently with considerably improved products like the Cruze and Orlando, but they're still not seen as good enough to mix with the big boys, and they're still capable of producing completely uncompetitive rubbish like the Spark.