Cutting Corners Helps China Make Better Cars

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

BMW visits CH-Auto

History tends to repeat itself – in different ways. One of the secrets of Japanese quality was a shortage of money. Bad quality was seen as waste – known as the detested “muda” to scholars of Kaizen. Lines had to be made more flexible; re-tooling had to be made easier, all because there was no money to waste. Likewise, China is getting better at making cars. One reason: It’s getting better at cutting corners, says a report by Reuters.

The man who wrote it knows Japan and China well. Norihiko Shirouzu was the Wall Street Journal’s China correspondent, now he is the man on the Chinese car beat for Reuters. He says:

“Paring back on crash tests, skimping on frills, simplifying designs, using cheaper materials and, in a departure for the industry, outsourcing most of their design and engineering are having a profound effect on the cost bases of China’s dozens of car makers. Some are now able to sell cheap and cheerful small cars for about 40,000 yuan ($6,350) – less than half the price of a plain vanilla Toyota.”

The outsourcing part is totally different from what the Japanese did and still do. Eight out of ten cars sold by independent Chinese automakers are the handiwork of three independent design houses: CH-Auto, IAT Automobile Technology Co. of Beijing; and TJ Innova Engineering & Technology Co. of Shanghai.

CH-Auto is a legacy of failed Chrysler. The company was established in 2003 by a small group of jobless Chinese engineers who had trained with Beijing Jeep, a former joint venture between BAIC and American Motors, later Chrysler. According to the report ..

“CH-Auto and its rivals say they have moved beyond aping foreign designs. Instead of copying the shape of a component or an entire foreign car, they try to match its performance as well – often successfully – even as they improvise and simplify the original design to cut costs. The aim is to make cars affordable to China’s emerging middle class, people who are earning 50,000 to 60,000 yuan a year ($7,900-$9,500).”

The competition in Japan already is taking note. Says Shiro Nakamura, chief designer at Nissan:.

“This is a warning shot to the established engineers who have told their management time and time and again that this is the minimum cost they can achieve with their existing design and production methodology. Now the Chinese are saying they can cut another 30, 40 percent of the cost.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 15 comments
  • Lynn Ellsworth Lynn Ellsworth on Sep 18, 2012

    Are we missing something else here? The article states that a few design firms are supplying dozens of auto "manufacturers". This business idea alone might be saving some money.

    • Greg Locock Greg Locock on Sep 18, 2012

      I think you may be unaware that there are several design houses that will design and develop your car for you already, both Porsche and Lotus Engineering have done so, and there are many others. I'm not convinced it saves anybody much money.

  • Amca Amca on Sep 18, 2012

    This approach will never lead to cars acceptable in the US and Europe or Japan, for that matter. All impose heavy regulations designed to make cars safer and more efficient. And that entails heavy-duty engineering - hybrid system, lightweight structures, electronic intensive nannying devices. Outsourced super low cost engineering will never be able to compete in engineering demanding US and European markets. The Chinese are not miracle workers. Their economy looks miraculous, but it isn't. It's just a loosening on investment and reward. Not all that hard to do, the government just has to allow certain things. And they've regulated it so badly, they're riding for a fall. The Chinese economy will look significantly less miraculous in, oh, five years' time. And in ten, we'll all be wondering why we thought they were geniuses.

  • Jbltg Nope.
  • ChristianWimmer This would be pretty cool - if it kept the cool front end of the standard/AMG G-Class models. The front ends of current Mercedes’ EVs just look lame.
  • Master Baiter The new Model 3 Performance is actually tempting, in spite of the crappy ergonomics. 0-60 in under 3 seconds, which is faster than a C8 Corvette, plus it has a back seat and two trunks. And comparable in weight to a BMW M3.
  • SCE to AUX The Commies have landed.
  • Arthur Dailey The longest we have ever kept a car was 13 years for a Kia Rondo. Only ever had to perform routine 'wear and tear' maintenance. Brake jobs, tire replacements, fluids replacements (per mfg specs), battery replacement, etc. All in all it was an entirely positive ownership experience. The worst ownership experiences from oldest to newest were Ford, Chrysler and Hyundai.Neutral regarding GM, Honda, Nissan (two good, one not so good) and VW (3 good and 1 terrible). Experiences with other manufacturers were all too short to objectively comment on.
Next