Junkyard Find: 1980 Fiat X1/9

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

In 1980, Fiat shoppers had the choice of two affordable sports cars: the 124 Sport Spider (examples of which remain quite common in wrecking yards, and the X1/9. The mid-engined X1/9 featured 128 running gear and was a lot more fun to drive than its 66-horsepower (for US-market models in 1980) engine would suggest.


The message of this TV ad seems to suggest that Fiat learned everything it needed to know about building cars from its successful racing cars of the 1920s, and the claim that the X1/9 gets the best mileage of any two-seat sports car in America doesn’t sound so compelling when you consider the competition.

The X1/9 was once reasonably plentiful on American roads, but most examples disappeared before the turn of the century. You will see the occasional X1/9 in self-service junkyards these days, but not in anywhere near the numbers of the Sport Spider.

It looks like somebody started to work on the body of this car, then gave up.

Is this an air-conditioning compressor? I’m sure the owner’s manual advised drivers to use AC only on long downhill grades.






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • MadHungarian MadHungarian on Jun 23, 2012

    "Five-speed transmission for performance." Uhhh, all the gears in the world won't transmit more power than the engine is putting out! Gotta love advertising.

  • Zeus01 Zeus01 on Nov 30, 2013

    I helped a friend shop for one in Vancouver in 1985. Found a red '74 with no rust advertised for $1700. Went to look at it, test drove it and my friend settled with the seller at $1600. He paid a $100 deposit and then hustled off to the bank to withdraw the remaining $1500 (we really weren't expecting to actually BUY the car, but changed our minds after driving it) while I stayed at the curb with the seller and another buddy with us who was along for the ride (in my car, not the Fiat). As we waited, a middle aged guy who smelled like a used car dealer drove up, only to find the car was in the process of disappearing right under his nose. He asked the seller what price he had let the car go for, as if that mattered by now, and the seller told him. With not even the slightest degree of class or sense of fairness the salesman swore and then blurted out "I'll give ya $1800 right here, right now!" The seller declined, saying he'd already made a deal. Salesman stomps back to his car, slams the door and, as he's buckling in his rather impressive girth my other buddy sauntered up to his window and said "Hey, when Kevin gets back I'll ask him if you'll go to $2000 after he buys it." Even the seller laughed. Salesman didn't though. He practically screamed "F*** you!" and screeched out of there. Not sure if he heard my buddy reply "I'll take a rain check - when you're lucky and I'm desperate!" but I'd like to think he did. The car only had one issue before Kevin sold it a year later (classic case of getting married, needed money), but it was not an insignificant snag. Timing belt let go, taking a couple valves with it. $650 was a lot more money in 1985 than it is now.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next