International Crisis Reaches Brazil. Government Action Knocks Prices Down.

Marcelo de Vasconcellos
by Marcelo de Vasconcellos

Brazil has historically been a difficult place to do business. The government keeps foreigners out as best as it can, and that extends to vehicle importers as well. In the car business, you are welcome to market your wares as long as you build locally. Imported cars have always been expensive, and the costs are set to rise, as the government has taken new measures that affect both local makers and importers. Read this very closely before you ask for import restrictions into your country.

On Monday, May 21, Finance Minister Guido Mantega announced a series of measures. A 14 percent drop in car sales, a record high 5.7 percent delinquency rate on car payments and an average of more than 40 days to move the metal were some of the justifications for the intervention. I wouldn’t call you a cynic if you believed that this action was taken mainly because the automotive industry is famous for its lobbying prowess and politics. Local elections are right around the corner, and the government finds itself in the middle of a debilitating scandal involving public contracts. A McCarthy-style Investigative Commission has been set up in Congress, and the circus act is on full swing in Brasilia. Most analysts agree that this commission will most likely get results about as valuable as McCarthy’s.

With some close races to be had, especially in the all-important city of São Paulo, which to the glee of our politicians holds the third largest purse in the country, it wouldn’t be too far-fetched to imagine the automotive industry threatening mass firings and a government cowed into spreading some cheer, divert attention from its troubles and avoid unemployment and loss of votes.

Measures included in the government’s pacote de bondades, as the Brazilian media likes to call such things, involve cutting taxes. The Minister mentioned that the government will pass up 2.1 billion reais in uncollected taxes. Cars will now incur less IPI (Tax on Industrialized Products,) measured according to displacement, vehicle class, its fuel requirements and country of origin. As a peace offering to OEMs that import, rather than build locally, imports will also benefit from lower taxes – as long as they have a displacement of 2000 cc or less (see tables below). Supposedly that’s for ecological and economic reasons.

A cut in the IOF (Tax on Financial Operations) was approved to stimulate consumers to take more credit and pay longer plans. This way, more costumers will be in a condition to get themselves into further trouble, I mean, take on more debt. Previously, consumers paid an IOF of 2.5 percent a year. This has been cut to 1.5 percent. Imagine that instead of taking the interest of your alleged home equity loan off your taxes, you would have to pay additional interest to Uncle Sam. Inconceivable? Welcome to Brazil.

Banks will also have to make fewer compulsory deposits. This will free up about 18 billion reais for the banks to apply in long-term financial operations. According to the Central Bank, this figure represents 10 percent of all the credit available in the car segment.

Cars produced locally or in Mercosur or MexicoCategory/DisplacementFuelNew IPI TaxPrevious IPI TaxUp to 1.0LAny0%7%Between 1.1 and 2.0LEthanol and flex fuel5.50%11%Between 1.1 and 2.0LGasoline6.50%13%Above 2.0LAny25%25%Commercial VehiclesAny1%4%Cars Imported from countries other than Mexico and MercosurCategory/DisplacementFuelNew IPI TaxPrevious IPI TaxUp to 1.0LAny30%37%Between 1.1 and 2.0LEthanol and flex fuel35.50%41%Between 1.1 and 2.0LGasoline36.50%43%Above 2.0LAny55%55%Commercial VehiclesAny31%34%

In Minister Mantega’s explanation, he warned that the IPI reduction would be valid only until August 31. At that point, he seemed like any small time dealer shouting, “Buy now!” on TV. The IOF tax and reduction on compulsory deposits are good for an undetermined amount of time. He stressed that makers had agreed to sacrifice for the good of the country and agreed to reduce list prices anywhere from 1.5 to 2.5 percent depending on model. Buyers of imported cars above 2 liters are out of luck. They keep paying a dizzying 55 percent tax on their cars.

As analysts have pointed out, delinquency on car loan payments has almost doubled from a year ago. That means many consumers are already strapped for cash and heavily in debt. The Minister stressed that the government expected its measures to trigger a reduction of around 10 percent in prices for cars in the 1.0L category. For the higher displacement cars expectations hovered around a 6 to 8 percent drop. Also, the lowered IOF and easier credit would naturally lower interest rates, extend the number of installments and reduce the necessary outlay demanded by each installment.

Marcelo de Vasconcellos
Marcelo de Vasconcellos

More by Marcelo de Vasconcellos

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 16 comments
  • TonyJZX TonyJZX on May 30, 2012

    i think this sort of article is a great thing because it highlights just what economic conditions exist around the world i know most places are anti-car... even the English speaking west such as the North Americas have some odd anti-car legislations and I hear some places in the EU have a 5,000 euro yearly tax on cars over 5.0 liters... it would be nice to see just how bad it is around the world i know singapore pretty much sucks and of course everyone knows of the 2.5 euro per liter petrol costs in some places

    • MrWhopee MrWhopee on May 30, 2012

      Singapore has to be anti-car, because of circumstances. It's a really small country with relatively prosperous citizens. If cars are priced like they were in the US everyone would own cars and drive everywhere. The city/country would be inundated with cars, and they can't go anywhere. Thus the high tax, road pricing, and such to keep car population manageable. Plus they have excellent public transportation!

  • Carbiz Carbiz on May 31, 2012

    ... and yet Brazil has a very healthy industrial capacity. GM, Ford, VW... they all seem quite happy to build vehicles there. Perhaps Sao Paulo would not be the industrial heartland it became without these disincentives? Maybe a generation ago, Brazilieros were happy to accept jobs and compete with Europe and the United States on the wage front, but now they have a burgeoning middle class - and who wants to compete with Thailand or Korea for wages? Why would Brazliieros have a problem with a Camaro costing R160,000? If you want one bad enough, buy it. Otherwise, buy a Chevrolet or VW built in Brazil. Maybe Brasilia is happy to sign all the trade deals with China it can, but they are not so stupid as to hand over all their jobs, too.

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next