By on April 12, 2012

More details have been released about the explosion at a GM Tech Center battery lab yesterday that left one person hospitalized with chemical burns and a possible concussion. In a statement, GM said that while an “experimental battery” was undergoing “extreme testing”, gases were released from the battery cells. Something in the lab then ignited the gases and the subsequent explosion was severe enough to cause structural damage, blowing out windows and forcing open fortified doors. The battery itself was left intact. The Detroit News, according to an unnamed source, reports that prototype lithium-ion battery was made by A123, and that explosion happened during “intensive tests designed to make it fail”. The Warren, Michigan fire commissioner said that the lab was designed with safety in mind so damage was confined to the one laboratory. Though some of the 80 workers in the building were sent home for the day after the explosion, others continued to work. The 63,000 sq ft Global Battery Systems Lab has 176 test cells as well as 49 thermal chambers, where GM tests both production and prototype batteries. A HAZMAT team was dispatched to the facility, as were OSHA and MIOSHA inspectors, because of the injuries.

GM stressed that the incident was not related to the Chevrolet Volt or any other production vehicle. Since the electric version of the Chevy Spark won’t go into production until next year, the battery involved in the explosion might be a developmental version of the batteries A123 will be supplying for that project. It also might be a completely experimental prototype.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

10 Comments on “More Details On Explosion at GM Tech Center: Gases from Experimental Battery Ignited...”

  • avatar

    Haha, well played Ronnie.

  • avatar
    Robert Gordon

    Yes, most magnanimous.

  • avatar
    Carlson Fan

    Tagged as…. Things that have nothing to do with the Chevrolet Volt

    Love it!

  • avatar

    This sounds like it might be a next gen VOLT battery. Battery tech has not advance that much in the last five years and they only seem to advance every ten or so. I can see the next VOLT being in place in five years.

    • 0 avatar

      Could be but, as someone involved in R&D, I can say that the actual next gen Volt battery will incorporate lessons learned from this explosion. If no, why test it in the first place?

  • avatar

    So, these puppies might be going into a car called the Spark.

    A bit off topic – In rare circumstances, fast charging a traditional lead acid battery has resulted in an explosion, which blows the top right off the battery.

  • avatar

    There really should be more news coverage on R&D lab testing stuff….dampers getting tested until smoke comes out triggering smoke alarm, or brake system tested until they caught fire…stuff like that….

    So people will be so afraid of cars that burst into flame, and causes(to coin a favorite Jalop phrase), fiery death, that they’ll start using bike and public transit more….

    • 0 avatar

      I used to work for AlliedSignal Bendix and Lutz once slammed on the brakes of a Neon going 120mph…yup, brakes caught on fire. No one was surprised. The only thing we had to do was set brakes on fire in the Lab and analyze it’s fumes to make sure nothing toxic was coming off them.

      It was actually fun watching pads catch on fire on the brake dynos.

      • 0 avatar

        I’ve been involved in R&D as well as failure analysis at a number of companies, and it’s always a fun day when you get paid to test things until they catch on, um, I mean heat up until they, er, OK, experience a “thermal event.”

        One thing you quickly learn as a manufacturer is to NEVER use the ‘f’ word (fire). Seriously.

        In the case of this battery test lab explosion, it sounds to me like somebody messed up in designing the test setup. If they knew that the batteries could produce flammable/exposive gases as a result of this extreme battery testing, they should have created a special test area (using equipment rated for explosive atmospheres) safely away from other equipment and people and taken other precautions such as using an inert cover gas (such as nitrogen) to keep oxygen out of the picture.

        Remember the fire triangle and try to remove as many elements from it as possible. Do they even teach that anymore?

  • avatar

    I’m just glad they are testing it here under circumstances which are highly unlikely in the real world. So that when they get in the real world, things like this have a very small chance of happening.

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • dal20402: The comments here read like a bunch of retired mid-level managers hitting the Jack very hard indeed. But...
  • downunder: Wow, please don’t hold back. Stop mincing your words and say it out loud. What is really on your...
  • slavuta: You know! – this is not an issue. Who wasn’t a member of that? I can proudly say that I held...
  • MitchConner: Could care less what the Chinese do with their dirty money. Screw them. My take is on Ford. Mulally was...
  • Ol Shel: Pay close attention to the mentally ill billionaire. Do as he pleases.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber