Ford Fusion: NASCAR's Next Game-Changer

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

Poor Editor Derek. I would hound him all the way to the grave for calling the Ford Fusion a game changer, but let’s face it: he is likely to outlive me by some thirty or forty years. Perhaps I will leave a note in my will instructing my son to keep bothering Derek, and also to talk up my estate auction a little bit.

So here’s the Ford Fusion for NASCAR’s 2013 season. It shares absolutely nothing several important aesthetic ideals with the new street car. Click the jump for another photo and a few quotes from Ford regarding the new design, which to be fair does look like the biggest departure from common-template stock cars in some time.

The new NASCAR Fusion is said to employ multiple styling cues around the car to convey an identification with its non-racing counterpart. Although the changes look slight to non-racers, they are significant enough that the car will be tested for a full season before being released. As we have noted in the past, there is quite a bit of applied technology in NASCAR. An undeveloped silhouette would find itself miles behind the competition at the checkered flag. Literally.

Find out more at a completely impartial website.

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Dolorean Dolorean on Jan 25, 2012

    One could argue that the demise of the big American manufacturers to world competition had its roots in "the NASCAR". Once innovation in technology was replaced with personality based reactionary racing, the big three suffered boldly from a severe lack of innovation and bias in to their own superiority. Thankfully looks like Ford is making baby-steps-to-victory in taking the NASCAR back to relevancy.

  • Monty Monty on Jan 25, 2012

    I'm not going to waste time and space for a diatribe against NASCAR. It is what it is now, with more viewers and spectators than it's ever had, especially during the "golden years". However, that is a handsome car - and even more so in profile. It's screaming out for a TWO DOOR COUPE!!! Ford, if you care about your legacy going forward from this point, give us a frikken two door coupe based on the 2013 Fusion, please. I promise, I will buy it NEW if you make it.

  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next