The Case Of The Purloined Gymkhana

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

A few days ago, Jack Baruth reminded us that an autocross event organized by Gymkhana GRID was cancelled, because a company by the name of DC Shoes claimed the rights to the word Gymkhana. If I would have been in Gymkhana GRID’s, well, shoes, I would have told DC Shoes to pound sand. What happened?

On February 23, 2011, Mitch Milstein, VP, General Counsel Global IP of Quiksilver Inc, residing at 15202 Graham Street, Huntington Beach, CA, 92649, registered GYMKHANA for his client DC Shoes, Inc. which happens to live at the same address. He required trademark protection for Gymkhana , amongst others for “on-line journals, namely, blogs featuring information regarding sporting, recreational and cultural events and activities.”

Should you be doing a Gymkhana blog, watch out, Mitch Milstein might send you a cease and desist. I would ignore it.

Amazingly, the United States Patent and Trademark Office did a more than thorough job. They had refused the trademark on May 25, 2011 in a non-final office action. Not only because (doh!) Gymkhana Gymnastics Club, Inc. had the Gymkhana trademark since 1993. Also, because the trademark was too generic.

“The wording GYMKHANA means or refers to a form of motorsport similar to autocross. See attached definitions, webpages on the sport, and Wikipedia article. The below listed goods and services all feature sports, recreational, and cultural activities broadly or directly relating to motorsports and other street sports.”

Finally, the applicant was caught performing trademark suicide. Says the USPTO:

“Moreover, what appears to be applicant’s website uses the term “gymkhana” to refer descriptively or generically to the sporting activity. See attached screen shots of applicant’s website.”

If you ever want to assert a trademark, never get caught doing that. When I worked on the Kleenex account many years ago, half of our agency had a one day training session, in which their trademark lawyer pounded into us to “Never call a Kleenex a Kleenex.”

Wie bitte?

“It’s a Kleenex tissue! A trademark is an adjective! If you use it as a noun, we can lose the mark!” This is a little-known trap in the trademark law, don’t step into it.

Also, if you ever want to register a trademark, use the same tools the USPTO uses: Google the name, search it in Wikipedia, check whether its URL is registered. And please, check the trademark database.

Meanwhile the Gymkhana wars wage on. Mitch Milstein filed a Gymkhana trademark for “Belts, Footwear, Gloves, Headwear, Jackets, Pants, Shirts, Shorts, Socks, Sweatshirts, Swimwear, Undergarments, Vests.” Not all trademark examiners are equal. This one was published and is waiting for comments. If you want to print “Gymkhana” on your gymkhana team t-shirt, complain. Other Gymkhana marks have been applied for and are pending. If any trademark application comes even close to the matter of Gymkhana races, opposition notes should be immediately filed.

Gymkhana applications have been denied because the “mark is merely descriptive.” The USPTO now knows that Gymkhana describes “an equestrian or auto racing entertainment.” And just like someone can’t trademark “auto racing”, nobody should be able to trademark “Gymkhana”. At least not for race. However, the matter needs vigilance. Disputing a trademark before it is registered is easy. Striking it down after registration is tough and costly.

And just in case anybody runs out of websites, Wikipedia entries and blogs that show that “Gymkhana” has been a generic name since before Mitch Milstein finished law school, enclosed is a book a friendly TTAC reader sent us. “Sports Car Rallies, Trials and Gymkhanas” was published first in 1956, a revised edition in 1960. Even that book admits to an act of Gymkhana-thievery:

“Some years ago sports car drivers decided to appropriate and adapt a variety of standard track-and-field tests – the hurdle, the shot-put, the discus throw and the relays. From swiping the games to stealing the name was an easy step: The word “gymkhana,” well established in the lexicon of college athletics, thus became our term for ‘track meets wheels.’“

Stealing Gymkhana has a tradition.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 17 comments
  • Lorenzo I just noticed the 1954 Ford Customline V8 has the same exterior dimensions, but better legroom, shoulder room, hip room, a V8 engine, and a trunk lid. It sold, with Fordomatic, for $21,500, inflation adjusted.
  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
  • Michael S6 Given the choice between the Hornet R/T and the Alfa, I'd pick an Uber.
  • Michael S6 Nissan seems to be doing well at the low end of the market with their small cars and cuv. Competitiveness evaporates as you move up to larger size cars and suvs.
Next