The Future Of Electric Vehicles: Who? Where? When? How Much? How Many?

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Forecasting the success of game-changing technologies is like predicting the weather. Despite a mediocre success rate, it is done every day. Ask me what the weather will be in 2017, and if I want to be absolutely right, I will say: “During the summer months, we expect sun with occasional rain, whereas in the winter months, some snow can be expected.” This prediction would protect my career in any company, but it won’t get me any press.

If I want press, I need to say: “In 2017, fire and brimstone will rain from the skies, which will cause a great conflagration, because all rain will have stopped a year earlier.” These predictions can be made with little risk. Six years down the road, who will remember the nonsense I said today? That thought crosses my mind as I read studies that predict the adoption of electric vehicles. Today, we have two of those. They couldn’t be more apart. We commissioned a third one.

A new report from Pike Research says cumulative global sales of plug-in electric vehicles (both plug-in hybrids and pure EVs) will reach 5.2 million units by 2017. Also in 2017, Pike sees cumulative global sales of 8.7 million hybrids. I am not commenting on the first number. The last number sounds awfully low: In March 2011, Toyota alone had already sold more than 3 million hybrids. The global sales number of all hybrids was around a million last year.

The charitable thought that Pike has its “cumulative” messed up (it usually stands for “all cars sold up until that point”) is derailed by another prediction by Pike. Pike thinks that by 2017 plug-ins and hybrids will represent a global market share of about three percent. According to Pike,

“Adoption will be highest in North America, where electrified vehicles will capture 4.9 percent of the total light-duty vehicle market in that year.”

The other report was released a while ago by the Boston Consulting Group. Their report wisely predicts that “the electric car will face stiff competition from ICEs when competing solely on the basis of TCO economies and, hence, will not be the preferred option for most consumers.”

BCG hopes that “there is a distinct “green” consumer segment that will be willing to pay a significant premium for EVs even if the total cost is higher.”

And where will most these EVs be sold? The Boston Consulting Group has a different opinion than Pike:

“China and Europe – not the U.S., as many believe – will be the largest markets for EVs in 2020.

China is a major wildcard. Assuming that the government remains committed to EVs, BCG projects that these vehicles will represent 7 percent of the country’s new-car sales in 2020. Despite this moderate penetration, China will become the world’s largest market for EVs due to its overall market size.

Europe will become the second-largest market for EVs in 2020 with a projected 8 percent share of new-car sales, supported by consumers’ willingness to pay for green technologies, the region’s stringent emissions standards, and high gasoline and diesel taxes.”

BCG sees EVs and hybrids reach 15 percent of aggregate new-car sales in the four major markets (North America, Europe, China, and Japan) in 2020. They don’t give a global number, at least not in the free version of the study. But these markets represent the bulk of new car sales – at least today. China is indeed the wild card – for any type of car. My spreadsheet has total Chinese car sales at 60-70 million by 2020, with a – by world standards – still moderate car penetration of around 300 per 1000. Currently, the number is around 60 per 1000.

Last year, global production of all types of automobiles was 78 million, with China contributing 18 million. Add in India, and world car production can easily double by 2020. A 15 percent share would be 23 million EVs and hybrids in the year 2020 alone.

Pike and BCG clearly differ, both in numbers and main markets. So we asked our prediction champions at Edmunds what they think. John O’Dell, Senior Editor at Edmunds AutoObserver/Green sees it this way:

“EVs will have more traction in Europe and China because travel distances there for most drivers are relatively short – public transit is often used for longer trips – and because in Western Europe and China there are strong governmental programs aimed at promoting use of alternatives to gasoline and diesel, and electricity is one of the most readily available alternatives.

In the U.S., where driving distances typically are longer (even though most US drivers commute far less than 60 miles a day during the work week, longer trips on weekends are not uncommon) the range-extended plug-in hybrid and conventional hybrids are likely to far outsell all-electric (or battery-electric) vehicles for years to come.”

The problem with all these predictions is that they use logic. Gas and diesel easily cost double in Europe compared to the U.S. Logic dictates they all drive electric vehicles by now. They don’t. Even the adoption rate of hybrids is homeopathic. In 2010, the adoption rate for hybrids and EVs stood at 0.8 percent in Germany.

Logic is even more thrown off by the fact that fuel prices fluctuate wildly across Europe. Oddly enough, they are highest in Norway, the Saudi Arabia of Europe. How does $10/gal grab you? If you want to get gas “cheaply” (like $7 a gallon), you need to go to Latvia or Luxembourg. Nevertheless, the needle on the adoption-meter in Europe doesn’t even quiver. What moves is the mileage-meter. The average new car registered in 2001 in Germany used 8 liters of gasoline per 100 km and 6.4 liters of diesel. By 2010, this had dropped to 6.5 liters of gasoline per 100km and 5.8 liters of diesel – across all cars, from Mini to S-Class. 5.8 l/100km is 40mpg (non-EPA).

In China, the price of gasoline is higher than in the U.S. (between $4.75 and $5.30/gal, depending on grade and currency rate,) but it still is not as outrageous as in Europe. Sales of EVs and hybrids? The Guardian cites a report by IHS Global Insight that says that exactly one Prius was sold in China in 2010. The Guardian promptly found an anonymous industry observer who quipped that “it may be a domestic rival that bought the hybrid to strip it down and see how it works.” Chinese clichés are always fun, but at that take rate the Chinese won’t even bother taking a Prius apart.

I don’t see this situation to change quickly. Europeans may have outrageous gasoline prices, shorter driving distances and that fabled public transport. Nevertheless, purchasing decisions are usually driven by such illogical considerations as visiting the in-laws 300km away, and touring Tuscany next summer. As the stats above show, if they want to save gas, they drive diesel. European governments are very reluctant when it comes to EV subsidies, they need their money for other things. European drivers are very reluctant when it comes to changing habits at the pump, witness the recent buyer’s strike against ethanol.

The wild card in the EV game indeed is China. The wild card could be an 8, which stands for good luck, or a 4, which stands for death. We have chronicled China’s flirtations with electric vehicles extensively at TTAC, but currently, it is all talk and little action. Even generous subsidies can’t convince Chinese to drive electric. Even after subsidies, regular cars are cheaper. And most of all: No EVs to buy.

China has the power to force people to go electric. Any amount of Chinese coercion usually results in howls of protests from western media. Ordering Chinese to drive electric on the other hand results in applause. Even Gordon Chang, designated China-hitter on Fox and Forbes, demands more “policy support” – euphemism for raw force. The problem is that it’s not working.

“Beijing has already begun restricting new licence registrations. Sales have flattened,” reports the Guardian.

“Restricting new license registrations?” If I want to buy a new car in Beijing, I have to enter a lottery for a license plate. Roulette has better odds.

“Flattened?” Cratered is the better word. China Daily reports that in the first half of 2011, only 154,200 automobiles were sold in Beijing, 59.2 percent below the same period in the previous year. What sells in Beijing is plywood to board-up car dealers.

Beijing, with a population similar to all of Australia, would be the ideal market for EVs. China Daily explains why, and why not:

To buy a conventional gasoline-driven car in Beijing, customers have to wait for months to obtain a registration plate through a lottery system because of the Chinese government’s tightened purchasing policies.

There is no such limitation on electric cars, however, as the government seeks to encourage sales of new-energy vehicles.

In addition to a zero-rate purchase tax, buyers of electric vehicles can enjoy the benefits of a total price reduction of 120,000 yuan ($18,600) for each car as a result of central and local government policies designed to stimulate purchases.

The Chinese capital is one of 25 pilot cities chosen for large-scale promotion of electric vehicles.

However, sales remain low. Few brands have started to sell their wares through dedicated dealers and only a very small number of charging stations have been established in the city. Those that have been set up are currently lying idle.

Apart from the lucrative stimulus packages, all the other requirements, including infrastructures, the markets and even the cars themselves, are not ready.”

It does not look like this w

ill be changing anytime soon. Apart from great announcements, nobody seems to be in a great hurry to make product.

There is one company that has a proven, mass produced pure plug-in: It is Nissan and its Leaf.

Nissan has quietly advanced to the largest Japanese manufacturer in China. Nissan sold 1.3 million units in China in 2010 and wants to nearly double this by 2015. Nissan could sell Leafs in Beijing tomorrow to plateless and eager customers.

But Nissan won’t. Nissan will introduce a pure plug-in under the Chinese Venucia brand – by 2015. Nissan’s joint venture partner in China is state-owned Dongfeng. Carlos Ghosn could use the Chinese volume for his Leaf technology – but he is not stupid. Both Nissan and Dongfeng have their reasons for going slow.

The question “why not earlier than 2015?” gets you an inscrutable Chinese smile, or a Gallic shrug, depending on who you ask.

Both Pike and Boston Consulting will gladly sell you their studies and hope that you will hire them for ongoing consulting services. If you pay their fees, they will tell you what you want to hear. I am inclined to listen to the free advice by John O’Dell of Edmunds:

“I don’t believe that battery-electric vehicle (BEVs) will become the dominant type of personal vehicle in either Europe or China as automakers have billions invested in internal combustion engine technology and can still wring quite a bit more fuel economy out of that technology (some experts say it will be possible to boost average internal engine fuel efficiency by 30-35 percent over the next 25 years). The higher costs and range limitations of BEVS will keep them form being he primary vehicle in most garages.”

There is another thought that crosses my mind when I write about predictions. Before the IBM PC was launched in 1981, IBM had done extensive studies. The overall market for such a device was seen limited to 5,000. I kid you not. 5,000 pieces total. My agency had the European account for IBM, and I had their data.

We all know how that worked out.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href=""> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href=""> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.