What's Wrong With This Picture: Good Enough For Your Kids, Not Good Enough For Me Edition
What are we looking at here? Well, it’s a Camry, that much is obvious. In the window is a sign for “Educators Against 5.”
What’s “5”? It’s a bill, recently passed in Ohio, which prohibits collective bargaining by public employee unions on issues such as health insurance, sick leave and pension benefits. Needless to say, it is massively unpopular among unionized public-sector workers in said state, many of whom view it as the first step towards “union-busting”.
The actual merits of the law are probably best discussed elsewhere. However, this is the third car I’ve seen in two days carrying the “No 5” sign… and all three have had a little credibility problem.
That’s right! The Toyota Camry is primarily built by non-union labor in Georgetown, KY. The other two “No 5” cars I saw were both Hondas — and Honda doesn’t play ball with the UAW in this country either.
During a recent press trip, I listened to an older journalist talk about the failure of certain newspaper unions in this country. He said, “I’m a union member. And I support the union. But one day I found myself shopping in Wal-Mart, and I guess at that point the whole idea of union solidarity had disappeared for me.” It’s a very interesting point. The unions in this country aren’t sticking together, and they haven’t stuck together in some time.
When I look back at the cars I’ve owned in my lifetime, the number of union-built cars far outweighs the non-union ones. I have five street cars and one race car at the moment, all built with union labor here, in Canada, or in Germany. Hell, I’ve purchased a few dozen suits that were made with union labor in the United States (Hickey-Freeman, Oxxford, and a few other American manufacturers continue to use unionized workers exclusively in the production of their American-made clothing.) Yet I’ve never belonged to a union. I’m not even a member of any automotive press association. Not much of a joiner, I suppose. I didn’t consider whether or not the cars were union-built when I bought them.
A lot of public-sector union member in Ohio have apparently decided that my tax dollars should go to support unionized labor… and it’s their right to feel that way. I do think it’s interesting, however, that they don’t seem to think unionized labor is good enough for them. They’re shopping at Wal-Mart, they’re buying clothing from countries where workers’ rights are less than a joke, and they are choosing their vehicles from providers which ban the UAW from their property. What message are they sending — and will they be surprised if a state full of temps, contractors, casual labor, and Honda employees fails to see things their way?
More by Jack Baruth
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
- Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
- Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
- Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
- Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Comments
Join the conversation
I live in Ohio as well, and it sure does set up an interesting fall ballot as far as the schools go. I fully expect to see a bunch of school levies on the ballot, along with an effort to repeal the bill that Jack referred to. One thing that has not been commented on is that if they build the language in the previously passed Senate Bill 5 into some sort of budget bill, it will very likely survive the recall attempt. This option is being saved as a last resort (by the fiscal conservatives) in case the recall is successful.
There remains the possibility that the car in question doesn't belong to a union member. Not everyone against 5 is a public employee.