What's Wrong With This Picture: Good Enough For Your Kids, Not Good Enough For Me Edition

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

What are we looking at here? Well, it’s a Camry, that much is obvious. In the window is a sign for “Educators Against 5.”

What’s “5”? It’s a bill, recently passed in Ohio, which prohibits collective bargaining by public employee unions on issues such as health insurance, sick leave and pension benefits. Needless to say, it is massively unpopular among unionized public-sector workers in said state, many of whom view it as the first step towards “union-busting”.

The actual merits of the law are probably best discussed elsewhere. However, this is the third car I’ve seen in two days carrying the “No 5” sign… and all three have had a little credibility problem.

That’s right! The Toyota Camry is primarily built by non-union labor in Georgetown, KY. The other two “No 5” cars I saw were both Hondas — and Honda doesn’t play ball with the UAW in this country either.

During a recent press trip, I listened to an older journalist talk about the failure of certain newspaper unions in this country. He said, “I’m a union member. And I support the union. But one day I found myself shopping in Wal-Mart, and I guess at that point the whole idea of union solidarity had disappeared for me.” It’s a very interesting point. The unions in this country aren’t sticking together, and they haven’t stuck together in some time.

When I look back at the cars I’ve owned in my lifetime, the number of union-built cars far outweighs the non-union ones. I have five street cars and one race car at the moment, all built with union labor here, in Canada, or in Germany. Hell, I’ve purchased a few dozen suits that were made with union labor in the United States (Hickey-Freeman, Oxxford, and a few other American manufacturers continue to use unionized workers exclusively in the production of their American-made clothing.) Yet I’ve never belonged to a union. I’m not even a member of any automotive press association. Not much of a joiner, I suppose. I didn’t consider whether or not the cars were union-built when I bought them.

A lot of public-sector union member in Ohio have apparently decided that my tax dollars should go to support unionized labor… and it’s their right to feel that way. I do think it’s interesting, however, that they don’t seem to think unionized labor is good enough for them. They’re shopping at Wal-Mart, they’re buying clothing from countries where workers’ rights are less than a joke, and they are choosing their vehicles from providers which ban the UAW from their property. What message are they sending — and will they be surprised if a state full of temps, contractors, casual labor, and Honda employees fails to see things their way?

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 102 comments
  • DaddyOfPayton DaddyOfPayton on Jul 20, 2011

    I live in Ohio as well, and it sure does set up an interesting fall ballot as far as the schools go. I fully expect to see a bunch of school levies on the ballot, along with an effort to repeal the bill that Jack referred to. One thing that has not been commented on is that if they build the language in the previously passed Senate Bill 5 into some sort of budget bill, it will very likely survive the recall attempt. This option is being saved as a last resort (by the fiscal conservatives) in case the recall is successful.

  • Dynamic88 Dynamic88 on Jul 20, 2011

    There remains the possibility that the car in question doesn't belong to a union member. Not everyone against 5 is a public employee.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next