Pennsylvania Court Hides Free Rides for Toll Collectors

by The Newspaper

July 21st, 2011 9:40 AM

pennsylvania court hides free rides for toll collectors

Public employees can take rides on toll roads at taxpayer expense, but these trips are not subject to disclosure according to a ruling Tuesday by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court. A three-judge panel denied the freedom of information request of the Harrisburg Patriot-News for E-ZPass transponder usage information data by for employees of the Pennsylvania Turnpike. On October 21 the paper sought details on the 2000 toll collectors who do not pay for use of the road, regardless of whether the travel was job related.

“I am requesting information in Excel format that details employee usage of Pennsylvania Turnpike since Jan. 3, 2010,” bureau chief Jan Murphy wrote to the commission. “I would like to know how many employees there are and how many have E-ZPass transponders assigned to them. Of those employees with commission-approved transponders, I am requesting their names, their positions with the commission, and a record of their usage of the turnpike including identifying the interchanges where they enter and exit the turnpike and the times and dates of travel. If this would cost more than $100, please notify me in advance.”

The commission immediately denied the request, citing Pennsylvania’s motorist privacy statute which offers substantially more protection than other states for tolling information. The data is specifically exempt from the right-to-know law and is not even “discoverable by court order.” States like California allow lawyers to obtain toll road usage records for use in divorce proceedings.

The Patriot-News appealed the commission’s refusal to the state Office of Open Records, arguing the privacy law was meant to protect the general public, not to shield government employees from disclosure of their employment benefits. The Office of Open Records on December 1 decided that the turnpike must turn over the job titles of those with free transponders and toll road usage records by those transponders so long as the names of the employees involved were redacted. The commission appealed the decision and the Commonwealth Court sided with the toll road.

“All of the information specified in section 8117(d) of the Transportation Act is exempt from disclosure, and the exemption includes vehicle movement records,” Judge Patricia A. McCullough ruled. “While requester did not use the term ‘vehicle movement records’ in her request, she did seek a record of the employees’ usage of the turnpike, including identifying the interchanges where they enter and exit the turnpike and the times and dates of travel. The term ‘vehicle movement records’ is not defined by the Transportation Act. Nevertheless, we can perceive of no other types of records which would fit within a definition of this term other than the type sought by requester herein.”

The request for the job titles of free account holders was denied because the commission insisted it maintained no documents containing that information. A copy of the ruling is available in a PDF file at the source link below.

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Murphy (Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, 7/19/2011)

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

#Crime&Punishment #Government #Law #Taxes #TollRoads #Traffic

Comments

Join the conversation

7 of 19 comments

HerrKaLeun on Jul 21, 2011

it sounds to me the 2000 people are working for the toll collection. Is the toll collection owned by the state and not private? that actually would be a good thing, because the profit of the toll-fascists would at least go to government and not some off-shore tax evading company (like red light cameras). It would be reasonable to give them free toll road use to come to work at the booth. If I work a that county fair I get free admission to just get to to my workplace. the band playing in the bar doesn't pay cover charge to get in. It might be an accounting nightmare to separate charges for work-usage and private usage. Obviously there is danger of abuse when an employee let's his cousins and all his brothers in law use the EZ-Pass. But charging the employees for their private miles might be more costly. I work for local government (a free bus pass is all my traffic perk, mind that, the city would even charge me for parking just so that i pay my employer for the benefit to work) and when I use a city cell phone for a private call I need to pay that. So for 20 ct. I spend some minutes filling out the charge form, an accountant and comptroller spends time with it. Maybe a total of an hour of staff time to get my 20 ct?? BTW: I use my personal cell phone for work because I don't want that hassle and want to use a good phone, not the crap they give us that can't even sync with outlook. So withhold judgment before you actually have more information on how beneficial this benefit actually is. It really may be cheaper to just let them use it free of charge. But I totally agree with the fact that all kind of perks should be public record.

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Ronnie Schreiber on Jul 22, 2011
  
  Dangers of abuse? Not from one of our selfless, dedicated, compassionate and caring public employees. /sarc Forget public record, public employees shouldn't get perks, period. And don't whine about how there are perks on every job. Working for us members of the public isn't every job. It comes with certain responsibilities and one of them is not getting special treatment. Don't let the tax feeders use it for free, let them pay like everyone else. How are they any different? They have to drive on a toll road to get to work, just like millions of other commuters. The idea that public employees should get any "perks" is absurd. Public employees should barely be allowed to vote, certainly not be allowed to form unions, and never given special privileges.
  
  Like
- Mazder3 on Jul 22, 2011
  
  @Ronnie Schreiber I agree that they should be paying tolls and not getting any other perks but barely being allowed to vote?
  
  Like
JuniperBug on Jul 21, 2011

I don't see the huge problem. I work for an airline and fly for next to nothing, given that there are open seats on the flight I want to fly on. Cops don't get traffic tickets, Blockbuster employees presumably can take home movies for free, restaurant workers get cheap food, theatre employees get into movies for free, etc. If one of the perks of being a toll collector is that they save a few bucks on the very tolls they collect, what's the big deal? This isn't exactly a case of fat cats doling out to themselves, now is it?

Like Reply
- See 2 previous
- Golden2husky on Jul 21, 2011
  
  Not to mention the collectors are not getting something that has to be restocked with public funds. The traffic from the collectors pretty much has no effect on the road, so there is no added cost. Some jobs just have added perks. My friend is a Florida cop and he often eats at fast food joints for free. Such behavior is illegal in my state but in Florida the owners have the option as to give free food or not. To the owners, the random appearance of police is good for security. So, I don't think allowing toll collectors to drive on toll roads without paying is a big deal at all.
  
  Like
- Ronnie Schreiber on Jul 22, 2011
  
  You don't get it, do you? Cops not getting traffic tickets is corrupt. Public employees should not get any kind of perks or special treatment. There's a difference between public and private sector jobs. The reality is that insurance companies and a lot of financial regulations have made the kind of perks and professional courtesies more of a thing of the past, except in government jobs. Doctors can't freebie clergy without fear of being charged with insurance fraud or charging Medicaid more than they charge those clergy. I'm sorry but lately I've been at the receiving end of a lot of rude behavior, entitled attitudes and treatment that you'd never see in the private sector. A consumer affairs rep at the Post Office hung up on me because I was not thrilled that I had to call up consumer affairs to try and get a refund for a non delivered express mail package and make two trips to my local PO. My ex is a customer service rep for Blue Cross, and someone better be screaming or swearing at her before she hangs up or she's likely to get fired. There's absolutely no accountability in the public sector. Look at Rupert Murdoch in contrast. He flipping closed down a business because of a scandal. When was the last time a government agency closed down period, let alone for bad employee behavior?
  
  Like
- Golden2husky on Jul 22, 2011
  
  @Ronnie Schreiber If you check out a Consumer Reports survey, satisfaction in customer service is at an all time low. Public or private, people are giving lousy service. Why? Well, on the private side, many full time people were let go and replaced with part timers to "save" on paying benefits. Anybody who thinks this business model is the recipe for success is smoking something. Public service? Some have a bad attitude because they feel they can get away with it. Others are tired of defending their performance because of being lumped in with the worst performers, or they are disgusted with being blamed for the recession. Either way, its time for a radical change. I have just been stonewalled on a @200 return for a heater bought online. The person is not rude to me; they just stopped replying, hoping i lose resolve. Not gonna happen...I let AMEX pull the charge and let them deal with it...
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Jeff S I don't believe gm will die but that it will continue to shrink in product and market share and it will probably be acquired by a foreign manufacturer. I doubt gm lacks funds as it did in 2008 and that they have more than enough cash at hand but gm will not expand as it did in the past and the emphasis is more on profitability and cutting costs to the bone. Making gm a more attractive takeover target and cut costs at the expense of more desirable and reliable products. At the time of Farago's article I was in favor of the Government bailout more to save jobs and suppliers but today I would not be in favor of the bailout. My opinions on gm have changed since 2008 and 2009 and now I really don't care if gm survives or not.
Kwik_Shift I was a GM fan boy until it ended in 2013 when I traded in my Avalanche to go over to Nissan.
Stuart de Baker I didn't bother to read this article. I'll wait until a definitive headline comes out, and I'll be surprised if Tesla actually produces the Cybertruck. It certainly looks impractical for both snowy and hot sunny weather.
Stuart de Baker This is very interesting information. I was in no danger of buying a Tesla. I love my '08 Civic (stick), and it feels just as responsive as when I bought it 11 years ago with 35k on the clock (now 151k), and barring mishaps, I plan to keep it for the next 25 years or so, which would put me into my mid-90s, assuming I live that long. On your information, I will avoid renting Teslas.
RHD The only people who would buy this would be those convinced by a website that they are great, and order one sight-unseen. They would have to have be completely out of touch with every form of media for the last year. There might actually be a few of these people, but not very many. They would also have to be completely ignorant of the Hyundai Excel. (Vinfast seems to make the original Excel look like a Camry in comparison.)