Traffic Camera Companies Step Up Fight Against Ballot Measures

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
traffic camera companies step up fight against ballot measures

Although red light camera supporters insist the programs enjoy broad support among the public, traffic camera companies are taking extraordinary measures to block ballot measures that would gauge public sentiment on the issue. Anti-photo enforcement initiatives are meeting corporate opposition in five cities in Washington state while American Traffic Solutions (ATS) is moving to reinstate red light camera use rejected by a majority of Houston, Texas residents. Albuquerque, New Mexico appears to be the only city with an unopposed referendum vote in play.

The city council on Monday voted 5-4 in favor of a motion by Councilor Dan Lewis to ask residents to decide whether automated ticketing machines should be banished from Albuquerque. Members of the council debated whether it was possible to offer voters a chance at a binding referendum or not, but most agreed that the council should respect the will of voters either way.

“The city clerk is instructed to place the following proposal on the next municipal election ballot, and the qualified voters of the city of Albuquerque shall be permitted to vote ‘for’ or ‘against’ the following proposal: PROPOSITION SHALL THE ALBUQUERQUE CITY COUNCIL CONTINUE AUTHORIZING THE ‘SAFE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS PROGRAM’, COMMONLY CALLED THE ‘RED LIGHT CAMERA PROGRAM’?” the adopted resolution stated.

The vote will happen in October if Mayor Richard J. Berry approves the measure. Last year, Anaheim, California’s city council became the first to offer voters an opportunity to ban red light cameras without the need for filing petitions. The ban was adopted with 73 percent of the vote.

In Bellingham, Washington on Monday, residents turned in 7000 signatures on a petition to ban the cameras, even though only 3880 were needed. The city signed a contract with ATS specifically giving ATS the right to sue to block a voter initiative. Longview’s petition came up an estimated 865 signatures short, but organizers are scrambling to obtain more before the deadline. In Monroe, organizers collected 2100 signatures — equal to two out of every three registered voters in the city. On Tuesday, the city council voted to ignore the wishes of residents and file suit on behalf of the red light camera company to block the vote. Signatures are still being collected in Redmond.

“This outpouring of public support for a public vote on those obnoxious ticketing cameras is really awe-inspiring,” Tim Eyman with Voters Want More Choices wrote in an email. “In my fifteen years of doing initiatives, I’ve never seen anything like it… at the end of the day, it is the issue itself — a public vote on automatic ticketing cameras — that inspired so many local citizens to demand their voices be heard at the ballot box.”

In Houston, Texas, ATS issued a $20 million ultimatum to the city council on Monday. A majority of voters in November demanded the cameras be thrown out, but ATS plans to turn them on anyway.

“Unless we hear otherwise from you, we are taking steps to reinstate, fully functionalize and resume processing red light violations for all currently installed city of Houston red light safety cameras beginning at 12:01am on August 1, 2011,” ATS General Council George J. Hittner wrote.

Hittner had a colleague of his father’s throw out the public vote last week. The ATS letter threatened to sue for “$20 million dollars or more” if the city failed to reactivate the cameras. The city council has yet to respond. Photo enforcement has never survived a public vote.


Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • MarkD MarkD on Jun 23, 2011

    "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. -That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it."

  • Steveua Steveua on Jun 28, 2011

    This is insane. Pretty soon we'll have private prison companies suing for tougher drug laws, and Halliburton electing people to office so we can go to war, and they can profit from it - oh wait, that already happened. So maybe this is just normal, and I'm crazy...

  • ToolGuy CXXVIII comments?!?
  • ToolGuy I did truck things with my truck this past week, twenty-odd miles from home (farther than usual). Recall that the interior bed space of my (modified) truck is 98" x 74". On the ride home yesterday the bed carried a 20 foot extension ladder (10 feet long, flagged 14 inches past the rear bumper), two other ladders, a smallish air compressor, a largish shop vac, three large bins, some materials, some scrap, and a slew of tool cases/bags. It was pretty full, is what I'm saying.The range of the Cybertruck would have been just fine. Nothing I carried had any substantial weight to it, in truck terms. The frunk would have been extremely useful (lock the tool cases there, out of the way of the Bed Stuff, away from prying eyes and grasping fingers -- you say I can charge my cordless tools there? bonus). Stainless steel plus no paint is a plus.Apparently the Cybertruck bed will be 78" long (but over 96" with the tailgate folded down) and 60-65" wide. And then Tesla promises "100 cubic feet of exterior, lockable storage — including the under-bed, frunk and sail pillars." Underbed storage requires the bed to be clear of other stuff, but bottom line everything would have fit, especially when we consider the second row of seats (tools and some materials out of the weather).Some days I was hauling mostly air on one leg of the trip. There were several store runs involved, some for 8-foot stock. One day I bummed a ride in a Roush Mustang. Three separate times other drivers tried to run into my truck (stainless steel panels, yes please). The fuel savings would be large enough for me to notice and to care.TL;DR: This truck would work for me, as a truck. Sample size = 1.
  • Art Vandelay Dodge should bring this back. They could sell it as the classic classic classic model
  • Surferjoe Still have a 2013 RDX, naturally aspirated V6, just can't get behind a 4 banger turbo.Also gloriously absent, ESS, lane departure warnings, etc.
  • ToolGuy Is it a genuine Top Hand? Oh, I forgot, I don't care. 🙂