Saab Shuts Down Again, Situation "Tense," No End In Sight

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Saab was supposed to reach 100% production speed sometime in the middle of last week after enduring a nearly two-month shutdown. But now it seems that more “material shortages” have brought the Trollhättan plant to its knees again, as Steve Wade of inside.saab.com reports

Yesterday, production at Saab Automobile stopped at lunchtime due to material shortages. We have now stopped again today for the same reasons…

The liquidity situation is still tense, and depends on several different financing solutions falling into place, long-term as well as short-term. Some milestones have been achieved, such as the letter of intent signed with Pang Da and the additional funding that their order of Saab cars means. An example of things that still await a solution is the sale and leaseback of Saab AB Property, which we have addressed in previous communications. Representatives from Spyker and Saab will continue to work with these solutions, while the dialogue between Saab and suppliers progresses.

According to one supplier quoted in GP.se, Saab has worked out new payment terms with its just-in-time suppliers, but still needs to work through issues with so-called batch suppliers. Swedish supplier sources confirm [via AN [sub]] that some suppliers still have not been paid, and have yet to restart their own production lines. And though official statements from Saab executives and spokespeople emphasize that this stoppage was not unforeseen and will be resolved, nobody at Saab seems ready to give a date for a production restart. Swedish media outlets have reported that production has been called off for the remainder of the week, though, and some suppliers have sent their workforces home.

And while the short term situation reverts from “glimmers of hope” to “same old sadness,” Saab also seems to be soft-pedaling the importance of its Pang Da deal, which Bertel and numerous other commentators have argued will not be approved by the Chinese government. Automotive News [sub] reports

“It’s tough for me to predict but I think everybody expects to come through,” Saab President and COO Tim Colbeck said at a media luncheon in New York on Tuesday.

If approved, the Pang Da deal could be a mid-term solution to Saab’s financial woes, Colbeck said. “Midterm” means at least through the end of 2012, he said, adding that Saab’s message to dealers right now is to focus on the company’s long-term potential.

“If this deal fails, it’s on to the next one. There are a lot of people looking to invest in Saab,” he said. There is no timeline for a final decision from the Chinese government on the Pang Da deal, he said.

But how many people can really be that interested in investing in Saab when only 385 Americans invested in actual Saab cars last month (around 1,600 global units for the month), and only 3,150 people have bought Saabs in the US market since the beginning of the year? And with production falling apart just days after Saab’s CEO said he would ensure that a shutdown wouldn’t happen again, this feels like the beginning of the end of the end for Saab.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Plattform Plattform on Jun 09, 2011

    I was at that lunch with Tim Colbeck and 8 other people. I sat across from him when he said that. I even recorded it on my iPhone using Voice Recorder. Right after explaining that, he said that he wasn't involved in the talks but from all indications they were confident the deal would go through. His quote merely meant that there are other interested parties is just that. You would have never guessed a Chinese auto distributor would be interested a month ago, yet here we are with the deal on the table.

  • Eldard Eldard on Jun 10, 2011

    They should sell the car exactly like that to save money.

  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
Next