Opel Soap, Day 2: Detroit Snubs Frau Merkel, Again

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Day 2 of the Opel rumor mill, and it keeps on grinding. Is Opel up for sale or is it not? Opel, their works council and regional governments close to the labor unions dismissed yesterday’s reports of a possible sale of Opel by GM as pure speculation. Yesterday, Opel chief Karl-Friedrich Stracke sent a letter to all employees. Today, he called an all hands meeting in Rüsselsheim and appealed to his workforce to ignore the nasty rumors. What is missing: A clear denial from Detroit. Today, Germany’s chancellor Angela Merkel demanded that GM should “provide clarity regarding the future of Opel,” writes Der Stern. And the magazine adds: “GM however continues to take cover.”

Both works council chief Klaus Franz and Thomas Bieling, head of Opel’s dealer council, are looking for a clear statement from Detroit. “A letter by Mr. Stracke won’t put me at ease,” says dealer-boss Bieling. “I want a letter from Mr. Akerson. So far, there’s nothing.”

Franz wrote a letter to Merkel and asked for help. GM seems to be back to the dangerous game of ignoring the German government. The Handelsblatt reports that both Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert and Beatrix Brodkorb, spokeswoman of the Germany Ministry of Economics state that the German government is in touch with Opel, but not with GM. Ever since GM reneged on Opel, Detroit and Berlin are on cold war footing.

Even the all hands meeting in Rüsselsheim could have been better. Says the Handelsblatt: “Stracke called the reports ‘speculation,’ but he did not deny them unequivocally.”

One thing is clear: Currently, Detroit would be happier without Opel on the books and dragging the newly minted stock down. Last year, Opel did cost GM $1.76 billion in losses. In November 2010, Opel chief Reilly had expected $2 billion worth of red ink. Apparently, some of that was moved into 2011. Closing down Antwerp in 2010 did cost some $200,000 per worker. Reportedly, the colleagues in Bochum sold their skins for a little more. Severance payments of up to $360,000 will flow. In the first quarter of 2011, GM tripled its profits, Opel continued to hemorrhage.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jun 10, 2011

    Opel may end up being for sale, but nobody's going to buy it. See script on Hummer, Saab, Saturn, and Pontiac for how it will go. The cast of characters will include wealthy Chinese conglomerates, small-time sports car mfrs, and celebrity car guys, all of whom will fall through in the end. Forget it; Opel will go down eventually, because GM can't afford the losses and Germany is not interested in them.

    • Patz Patz on Jun 10, 2011

      Sorry, I do not agree with your comment. Hummer was a brand, producing very particular cars and for really small markets (very low volumes out of the U.S.) Saab was in a disaster mode. Unfortunately. And it's still. It was a premium brand and manufacturer, with an extablished customer basis. But a small basis. And in my opinion wrong decisions has been made in the past by GM on Saab. They could have done of Saab what VW has done of Audi. They could have made a full 'premium' lineup of vehicles basing on the Opels (as Audis to VW). But it's always easy to say when you don't have the steering wheel in your hands ;) Saturn and Pontiac where brands as well. That's not the right comparison, I think. In Europe, GM doesn't have so many brands. They have Chevy and Opel mainly. Then, Cadillac (but with 'transparent' volumes to the market...)

  • Patz Patz on Jun 10, 2011

    @geozinger good point. Your understanding is right (also my German is not that good, anyway, so we might both be wrong...) Actually, interesting. I also cannot really understand the difference between Opel and GME - when we talk about legal or financial stuff, I always have hard times in understanding what's really going on. But you know, the Ruesselsheim engineering is almost a 'one thing' with the manufacturing, so I see a separate selling quite difficult. And I wonder who would really want to buy those 'expensive' plants. Also the Vauxhall facilities are very important and sensitive. Let's see what'll be next.

  • Lou_BC Hard pass
  • TheEndlessEnigma These cars were bought and hooned. This is a bomb waiting to go off in an owner's driveway.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Next