"Transportation Opportunity Act" Moves Towards Freeeway Tolls, Pay-Per-Mile
Editor’s Note: The text of the “Transportation Opportunity Act” with section-by-section analysis can be downloaded in PDF format here [courtesy: bna.com]
The White House last week began circulating its legislative proposal for transportation reauthorization that included provisions to add toll booths to existing freeways and impose a tax for every mile driven. The “Transportation Opportunities Act” for the first time gave the Obama administration’s full approval to the concept of an added charge on drivers for the use of roads throughout the country, including on existing, untolled freeways in major metropolitan areas.
“This section [2217] amends existing law to include two new options that provide more flexibility to finance new construction or capacity, and manage congestion, through the imposition of tolls,” states the proposal’s official summary. “The first option focuses on metropolitan congestion reduction and permits state and local governments to impose tolls on existing interstate and non-interstate facilities for the purposes of improving or reducing congestion in metropolitan areas with populations over one million people. Under this option, tolls may be imposed on specific lanes, whole facilities, or a network of facilities within the metropolitan area.”
The plan would require that commuters be charged higher rates during peak morning and evening periods and that the revenue generated be used for capital improvement projects near the toll facility. A second “interstate system improvement” plan would allow tolling in smaller areas so long as the project included new capacity. Electronic transponders would be required for toll collection on the new lanes.
The changes are significant, as existing federal law limits tolling of interstates to a specific number of pilot projects. The proposal is also a reversal of sorts for an administration that early on backed away from the concept of a nationwide per-mile toll floated in February 2009 by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood.
“I can weigh in on it and say that it is not and will not be the policy of the Obama administration,” then-Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said at the time.
That would change as the White House plan would set up a six-year project to address the technological challenges to establishing a system to track drivers for the purpose of imposing a tax for each mile driven.
“This section [2218] would establish a Surface Transportation Revenue Alternatives Office within the Federal Highway Administration,” the section-by-section analysis states. “The office would analyze the feasibility of implementing a national mileage-based user fee system that would convey prices to users to reflect system use and other travel externalities and serve as a funding source for surface transportation programs.”
The purported reason for including the per-mile taxing system is the potential for increased use of electric vehicles. The administration has poured billions in gas tax dollars to subsidize the companies that manufacture these electric vehicles as well as the end users who buy them. A “public awareness communications plan” would be implemented to sell the plan, which may be difficult. In the UK, an official petition against the idea of a per-mile tax gathered 1.8 million signatures on the prime minister’s website.
[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]
More by The Newspaper
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- IBx1 An acquisition only means one thing and that is ruin
- Carson D I saw a man driving a black Eos with the top down yesterday. I recall thinking that I don't want to be the sort of person who judges a man for driving a car that might be fun while seeming overtly feminine, but my initial reaction was thinking that my neighbor who won an Eos in a golf tournament only to let it rot in his garage for over a decade before selling it to a woman who'd just wrecked one did the right thing.
- Slavuta Model 3 cost $39K. The battery in is is about $13K. If you deduct cost of battery, the car costs $26K, which is normal for a car with the engine and transmission and all other modules. Its the fuel container here that makes it expensive. For model 3 - no. For Models S,X - may be. Can model 3 internals be used in a bigger car? Probably. What's stopping Tesla? Honda is already doing it. All their cars use same engine and probably transmission too - 1.5L T. Smart move. Buy Accord, pay thousands more than Civic and get same thing but the size.
- MaintenanceCosts If the top works, it’s a minor miracle. If the top doesn’t work, this is nothing more than a GTI with a weaker structure and 600 pounds of permanent ballast.
- SCE to AUX Anybody can make a cheap EV, but will it have the specs people want? Tesla is best positioned to do it, but achieving good specs could turn their profits negative.
Comments
Join the conversation
Americans want the biggest and the best, then whine when they need to pay for it.
Here are my thoughts on the subject, this is a direct infringement on our rights. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5677IvzHnp0