New Mexico Appeals Court to Take Red Light Camera Challenge

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper
new mexico appeals court to take red light camera challenge

A New Mexico district court judge on Thursday transferred a case challenging the legality of photo enforcement systems to the state’s second highest court. In a written decision, Judge Manuel Arrieta suggested it would save time and expense for the court of appeals directly to weigh the case against Cristobal Rodriguez who was issued a red light camera ticket by the private company operating on behalf of the city of Las Cruces.

A hearing officer working for the mayor found Rodriguez guilty of running a red light, even though the New Mexico State University educational management professor was not behind the wheel at the time of the offense. Rodriguez does not know who was driving, and the Las Cruces ordinance finds the owner guilty unless someone else steps up and pays the ticket. On January 20, Rodriguez filed an appeal to the district court, arguing that this procedure violated his due process rights under the constitution. He also argues that the photographs are hearsay, but the ordinance forbids motorists from raising any objections to the evidence. Because the ordinance authorizes confiscation of cars as a penalty, Rodriguez argued that the rules of criminal, not civil, procedure should apply. As the appeals court has already agreed to consider a similar case, Las Cruces v. Avallone Mechanical Company, it made sense for the district court to hold off on ruling in this case.

“The appeal challenging the STOP program raises constitutional issues which are of substantial public interest and are issues which will likely recur with some frequency,” Judge Arrieta wrote. “The need for uniformity in the resolution of these issues is great and will result in advancing the interests of judicial economy and reduce future litigation.”

Rodriguez, who is representing himself in the case, has an uphill legal battle. In 2007, District Court Judge Geraldine E. Rivera ruled that the city’s use of a “nuisance” ordinance to confiscate vehicles was “civil in nature” and therefore the lower legal burden of an administrative hearing was appropriate. She also declared that a punishment of vehicle forfeiture for exceeding the speed limit by a few miles per hour was not an excessive. Judge Arrieta believed a decision either way would end up in a higher court.

“An appeal from any district court decision is highly likely such that certification in the first instance would serve the interests of judicial economy and reduce litigation costs,” he concluded.

A copy of the order is available in a 700k PDF file at the source link below.

New Mexico v. Rodriguez (Dona Ana County, New Mexico District Court, 4/5/2011)


Join the conversation
  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Apr 18, 2011

    Good to see someone fighting this locally (I've been a New Mexican since 2001.) I'm amazed that some ambitious lawyer hasn't stepped up to help him pro bono just for the publicity.

  • John Fritz John Fritz on Apr 18, 2011

    People seem to not give a crap about these cameras which is mind boggling to me. I get fired up every time I read about a private person or a group of people resisting these local government extortion rackets. Fighting red light cameras is one of the first signs that regular people are starting to wake up to this constant government misconduct going on in our country. Camera fights are just the tip of the iceberg of growing civil disobedience aimed at overreaching government. It's about time.

  • The Oracle I say let the clunkers stay on the roads.
  • Jpolicke Twenty-three grand for a basket case? And it has '66 wheel covers and gas cap so who knows what else isn't original?
  • Scott Can't be a real 1965 Stang as all of those are nothing but a pile of rust that MIGHT be car shaped by now.
  • 56m65711446 So, the engineers/designers that brought us the Pinto are still working at Ford!
  • Spookiness I dig it. The colors are already available on the CX-50. The terracotta is like a nice saddle brown. The non-turbo Carbon Edition has a bluish gray and a burgundy leather interior. A nice break from the typical relentless black and 50 shade of gray palette. Early CX-30's had some dark navy blue (armest, console, and parts of the door) but I guess that was just too weird and radical so they switched to all-black.I'd be fine with cloth in colors, leather is over-rated, but I'll never have an all-black interior in a car ever again.