Don't Call Me Caravan!

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

When Chrysler Group first announced that it would be spinning off its Ram truck brand in order to allow the Dodge brand to “come out of the shadow of the trucks,” there was at least some logic to be found in the decision. After all, there used to be more to Dodge than truck-inspired styling and marketing, and concentrating “Ram-ness” into the trucks made a certain amount of sense. But then, Chrysler Group announced that Ram would be moving into the commercial vehicle business with a pair of European-style deliver vans, raising the question of how these distinctly un-Ram-like vans would fit in with the brand’s bro-magnon image. But now the Ram brand has a new problem: before it even challenges its fans with front-drive Euro-vans, it’s dropping a windowless Ram Cargo Van based on the Dodge Caravan. Because what separates a spun-off brand from its previous brand like shared product? Whatever Kool Aid they’re drinking over at the Ram Brand, my tank is just about full of it.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 44 comments
  • Obbop Obbop on Mar 08, 2011

    Might be just what I need when it's time to replace the Silverado. A van would be optimal for me as an alternate live-in-mobile.

  • INeon INeon on Mar 09, 2011

    Sounds like a terribly spartan place to be... Inside, Ram Cargo Van gets air conditioning with dual-zone temperature control, an instrument cluster with 120 mph speedometer and tachometer, outside temperature display, an overhead console, A-pillar passenger assist handle, 120-volt auxiliary power outlet, 12-volt front and rear DC power outlets, air filtering, audio jack input for mobile devices, AutoStick automatic transmission, cloth low-back bucket seats, “Ram” interior accents, door courtesy lamps, driver and passenger sun visors with mirrors, rearview auto-dim mirror, dual glove boxes, front courtesy / map lamps, headlamp shut-off delay, cargo compartment observation mirror, a liftgate floodlamp, lower instrument panel storage bin, dual sliding doors with alert warning, power locks, power front windows, rear dome lamp, speed control, steering wheel mounted audio controls, tilting and telescoping steering wheel, tip start and variable intermittent windshield wipers. It actually sounds totally comfortable, and with a modicum of toughness not offered by the Dodge, Chrysler or VW vans. I would drive the $hit out of a 300hp 25mpg cargo box on wheels. EDIT It also has a nice non-chromed grill. For those who wish for a less blinged-out trim-- this is it. I'd like to see one in black, with some optional black chrome wheels. Yes.

  • The Oracle What a rash of clunkers.
  • Zerofoo Not an autonomous system, but the blind spot assist in my CX-90 is absolutely flummoxed by TWO left turn lanes and shouts at me because there are cars in the lane I'm not in and have no intention of using.
  • Jimble AMC was hardly flush with cash when they bought Jeep. Ramblers were profitable in the early 60's but the late 60's were pretty lean years for the company and they had to borrow money to buy Jeep. Paying off that debt reduced the funds available for updating the passenger cars and meeting federal air quality and safety mandates, which may have contributed to the company's downfall. On the other hand, adding Jeep broadened the company's product portfolio and may have kept it going in those years when off roaders were selling better than economy cars. AMC had a couple flush years selling economy cars in the 70's because of oil shocks but that was after buying Jeep, not before.
  • Mnemic It doesnt matter who. These things are so grossly overpriced that they only need to sell a handful of them to cover the development costs. Why? Selling overpriced luxury cars is literally all of Germanys economy.
  • Jalop1991 nope. A broken taillight will total the car.
Next