Piston Slap: Celica Support Infrastructure

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

Jeremy writes:

Dear Sajeev, I am currently in possession of a 1985 Toyota Celica GT, with a clutch that is perpetually engaged. I originally bought the car when I moved across Canada, as a means of securing a cheap ride until I could save up some money for a down payment on a new car. I paid about $1100 for the car about 6 months ago, which had 165 000 verified kms and now has about 180 000. The car is actually in decent shape with very little rust, a clean interior, new front brakes and wheel bearings, new exhaust, spark plugs, bushings, and drove quite nicely up until now. It was not a problem when it moved because my girlfriend would use it for the day, then park it in our condos ‘visitors’ spots which are to be used for no more than 12 hours, a time limit that is strictly enforced.

I purchased a new car well before all of this, a 2011 Ford Focus (don’t laugh, it was a good price with all the options I wanted compared to the other cars I shopped for), so needless to say driving the Celica was a fun place to go on the weekend after a week of econoboxing. I would love to fix the clutch and keep this car, but I have nowhere to work on it, and don’t really want to pay what a garage would charge me to take it apart and fix it.

What do I do with it?

Sajeev answers:

Jeremy, that’s a lovely car! Not that you need my encouragement, but you must keep it no matter what. My advice is simple: get on the 3rd Gen Celica forums and pray you find a like minded soul nearby. That Celica nut could easily fix your car for the cost of parts, a few meals, and a lifetime of friendship. Friends within my car brands are some of my closest friends.

And that’s what you need: a Celica Support Infrastructure.

Here’s the thing about long term car ownership: it takes a life all unto itself. Your non-car friends do not understand why you devote significant amounts of time and money to your ride. Your family probably does not understand, because owning an old car brings about new experiences, challenges and relationships (cars or otherwise) that you simply cannot experience elsewhere.

Bonus! A Piston Slap Nugget of Wisdom:

Celica Support Infrastructures prove a bigger point: don’t we all need people to nurture and support our fascinations? I’d like to think so.

Send your queries to mehta@ttac.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 38 comments
  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on Feb 28, 2011

    Yup the 85 is the last of the RWD Celica's. My dad had a 72 and my sister a 81 and both eventually needed a clutch slave cylinder. Chances are this one does as well. These are great cars and worth dumping a few dollars into. 86 and up FWD always reminded me of a Lancia Beta done right. The styling and packaging are similar and with 16v 4 cyl on most models it's a Beta without the horrid reliability.

  • Richarbl Richarbl on Mar 01, 2011

    The commenters who have suggested the slave cylinder are quite possibly incorrect. A faulty slave cylinder is oftenresponsible for not allowing the clutch to engage but it is very unlikely that the piston would jam in the cylinder bore to the extent that the clutch diaphragm spring would not push it back. The cause of your clutch problem is more likely to be the clutch throwout bearing locating sleeve which slides on the gearbox input shaft. It was a problem specific to early mobel Hyundai Excels, probably because those Krafty Koreans were too tight to put a dollop of grease on the shaft during assembly. I would find a decent old school mechanic to fix the Celica and then decide whether to sell it or keep it because it will be worth almost nothing in its present circumstance.

    • Tony Lanterman Tony Lanterman on Mar 02, 2011

      Richarbl has this exactly backwards. The clutch slave cylinder is used to disengage the clutch plate. When it fails (at least on a 22R based Celica), pressing on the clutch pedal causes fluid to squirt past the bad seal instead of pressing the slave cylinder's piston. Last time I replaced one of them on a '83 Celica it was a $16 part. Replacing it required 30 minutes and both 12mm and 10 mm open end wrenches. The master cylinder rebuild kit was a bigger pain but still a cheap part at $22. When the clutch master cylinder fails on one of these it will leak down the clutch pedal onto the driver's side floor mat (which it will disolve). Run a hand up the backside of the clutch pedal. If it comes away slimy, that needs to be replaced.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next