Audit Reveals Plug-In Tax Credit Fraud

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: February 3rd, 2011

The DetNews points us to a Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration report [full document in PDF format here] that reveals

Approximately $33 million in credits for plug-in electric and alternative-fueled vehicles credits were erroneously claimed by at least 12,920 taxpayers through July 24, 2010, according to a report publicly released today by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA).

That means about 20 percent of the $163.9 million in credits claimed by taxpayers from January 1, 2010 to July 24, 2010 for plug-in electric and alternative motor vehicle credits were claimed in error.

The erroneous claims TIGTA identified resulted from inadequate IRS processes to ensure information reported by individuals claiming the credits met qualifying requirements for vehicle year, placed in-service date, and make and model. TIGTA’s review of electronically filed tax returns identified individuals who erroneously claimed the same vehicle for multiple plug-in electric and alternative motor vehicle credits or claimed an excessive number of vehicles for personal use credits.

Zoinks!

More highlights: “at least” 88 prisoners filed for the credit, while other taxpayers sought the credit for vehicles like Buick Enclave, Chevrolet Camaro, Harley Classic, Hyundai Sonata, Cadillac Escalade, Dodge Durango and yes, HUMMER H3. Also,

TIGTA found that the IRS is unable to track and account for plug-in electric and alternative motor vehicle credits claimed by individuals on paper-filed tax returns. Processes were not established to capture this information from paper-filed tax returns.

Also:

we identified IRS employees who erroneously claimed plug-in electric and alternative motor vehicle credits

The good news: with $13m in fraudulent claims filed, we can take some solace in the fact that only $7m in funds have been lost…

#EV #Government #Green

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 26 comments

FleetofWheel on Feb 03, 2011

All the bureaucracy lovers see nothing wrong with layers of tax incentives, hold backs and endless self-contradicting carrots/sticks. They actually think that without such govt enacted behavior engineering, no products would be made and no services delivered. In moment of clarity, they might realize that with a simpler tax code, taxes could be more swiftly and accurately taken from taxpayers and business but it's just too irresistible to not boss and goad people with their progressive urges, guilt and social experimentation.

Like Reply
Shaker on Feb 04, 2011

The Republicans: Run up huge deficits by supporting the military industrial complex, fight illegal and unjust wars, allow deregulation so that "free market" proponents can avoid taxes, outsource jobs and destroy the middle class. The Democrats: Get labeled as "socialists" by trying to right all the wrongs of the previous Republican policy. Rinse and repeat. I'd rather see policies that try to move us forward as a country, into the future, than policies that support entrenched, money-centric dinosaurs that fear the future (there's more risk than profit in the short term) A benign government trying to mitigate some risk is somehow twisted into some sort of 'conspiracy' to alter people's behavior, while the previous administration merely had to wave the flag to spend billions on a war that no one truly wanted (except defense contractors and Halliburton). And that's why I like cars. (even though I'm starting to hate oil.)

Like Reply
- See 1 previous
- Geeber on Feb 04, 2011
  shaker: Run up huge deficits by supporting the military industrial complex... Except, of course, it's fun to listen to Congressional Democrats - including the ones supposedly against excessive military spending - scream bloody murder when a proposed cut affects a military base or major defense contractor in their district. That is certainly entertaining. shaker: fight illegal and unjust wars... Yes, it was illegal and unjust to attack the country that sheltered the people who plotted the 9/11 attacks, and liberate said country from a backward, cruel regime. And I seem to recall lots of Democrats saying that a certain leader in Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and supporting the Iraq War (unless Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton are now Republicans). For that matter, I recall our current vice president labeling Iraq a "success" on Larry King Live. Granted, he is known for his propensity to put his foot into his mouth, but I don't recall his boss (that would be the current president) contradicting him. shaker: ...allow deregulation so that “free market” proponents can avoid taxes, outsource jobs and destroy the middle class. You might want to review your history books. Deregulation of certain industries - airlines, trucking and telecommunications - started under President Jimmy Carter and was supported by then Senator Ted Kennedy. Are they now Republicans? And, last time I checked, deregulation had lowered prices and brought more choices to consumers in those sectors. We never "deregulated" the steel, auto, tire and heavy manufacturing industries, which are usually pointed to as proof that "deregulation" was a disaster for the country. Those industries went through a restructuring because they couldn't compete with the superior, more efficient foreign competition. But - surprise, surprise - the United States is still the number one manufacturing nation in the world, and manufacturing as a percentage of the gross domestic product has remained steady over the years. The difference is that we make MORE products with FEWER resources, which include employees. That is how productivity improvements work, and only the blessedly ignorant try to stop that process. Which, of course, includes the UAW and its attempt to prevent a reduction in the number of UAW members who work for the Big Three with the Jobs Bank. We see how well that one worked - it helped bring GM to bankruptcy and almost killed Ford, too.
  
  Like
- CamaroKid on Feb 05, 2011
  
  Iraq sheltered the people who attacked us on 9/11 WOW... even dick cheney has dropped that BS.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)