Ask The Best And Brightest: What's Wrong With The Super Bowl Car Ads?

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: February 9th, 2011

ask the best and brightest what s wrong with the super bowl car ads

This ad, for the Chevy Camaro, was the most-watched spot during the Super Bowl, pulling in 119,628,000 sets of eyeballs according to the ratings agency Nielsen. A Chevy Cruze ad took second place in the “most-watched” category, and Chrysler’s much-chattered-about 200 spot tied for fourth (with 5 other spots, including one for Bridgestone Tires), with 17.565m viewers. In short, cars and car-related products not only accounted for many of the ads, they managed to snag the time slots where the fewest people were taking bathroom breaks or grabbing more bacon-wrapped buffalo wings. But remember, there’s more to effective advertising than merely drawing eyeballs…

For one thing, an ad has to reach its viewers on an emotional level. It needs to elicit sympathy… and for the amount of money needed to run a Super Bowl spot, it needs to elicit with gusto. VW’s “Darth Vader” Passat ad did just that, although it did so to millions fewer people than Chevy’s spots. Meanwhile, Chevy’s “most-watched” ads didn’t rate on Nielsen’s top ten “most liked,” a quality the ratings agency defines thusly:

The Likeability score is the percentage of viewers who report to like “a lot” an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl, among those recalling the brand of the ad. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Likeability Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Likeability Index of 186, the Volkswagen “Darth Vader” ad was almost twice as liked compared to the average Super Bowl spot.

And in a world that’s oversaturated with advertising, would you prefer a “quantity” impact or a “quality impact”? But then, “likeability” isn’t everything in advertising either. After all, who cares how good an ad makes the viewer feel about a product or brand if said viewer is unable to remember the product or brand being promoted? That’s where Nielsen’s “most recalled” index comes in, a metric described as

the percentage of viewers who can Recall the brand of an ad they were exposed to during the normal course of viewing the Super Bowl. These scores are then indexed against the average score for all Super Bowl ads (Recall Index). 100 equals average. For example, with a Recall Index of 179, the Doritos “Pug” ad was 79% better-recalled than the average Super Bowl spot.

#Advertising #AskTheBestAndBrightest #Branding

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 55 comments

Zackman on Feb 10, 2011

A day late and a dollar short as usual, but after reading and evaluating how I would contribute to this topic, all I can come up with is this: The ad agencies are simply trying too hard and have gone over the top in trying to get our attention and, all too often, losing their point in the process. For example, I see nothing positive about glorifying "thuggery" and "hopelessness" as I did in the Chrysler ad for the 200. A (c)rap "star" and a dead city are nothing to be proud of, and somehow showing this as a positive does nothing for me. You don't glorify "darkness". I am a firm believer in looking at the better side of things, as Johnny Mercer sang: "Accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative, don't mess with Mr. In-Between". Case in point: 40 years ago, all the car dealers in Roseville, Ca. got together and pooled their money to make one good series of commercials that were absolutely corny, but absolutely hilarious that I remember to this day. Simple. Also during that time, Jay Brown of Spartan Dodge in San Jose sponsored all-night movies on channel 44 in the Bay area, even had full-size posters made extolling his "virtues" of "price-chopping", offering the "best deals in town". Again, simply, but funny and effective. Things now are so amped-up, they don't work all too often and leaves me scratching my head, asking myself: "what, exactly, are they trying to sell me?" This latest crop of Super Bowl ads leave me cold, along with the non-car ones. The VW was the best, because it was simple and humorous and innocent. maybe the ad agencies need to re-address their standards. I know full well that it's not a "Leave it to Beaver" world, it never was, but your message should at least make your prospective customers feeling good and not paranoid.

Like Reply
Darth Lefty on Feb 10, 2011

At NYTimes.com, I just experienced the next step in the 200's marketing. To "Imported from Detroit," they have added the tagline, "A car you don't have to own to be proud of." The ad also contains a bald eagle. No, really.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

EBFlex Garbage but for less!
FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.