Will GM Sell 120k Volts Next Year?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Production of Chevrolet’s Volt was supposed to be limited to 10k units this year, a target GM has already set its sights on surpassing. With 2012 volume projections now reaching 25k units, the next step in The General’s quest to prove that the Volt is a viable vehicle is a staggering goal: doubling its 2013 production target from 60k to 120k units of production. According to Bloomberg, GM has not officially announced the 120k volume goal and may not build that many Volts in 2013 at all, if energy prices and supplier challenges don’t allow it. And though supplier issues could well leave the goal out of reach, even if GM is able to ramp up production to fulfill its 120k unit goal by next year, there are no signs yet that the market will support those production levels. After all, GM is essentially banking on the kind of volume-to-price niche that BMW has taken years to cultivate with its 3 Series… which starts at prices slightly below the Volt’s $41k, and still moved fewer than 110k units last year.

But GM CEO Dan Akerson doesn’t see the pushing Volt volume as a pure business play, but as a strategic hedge. He explains

We want to stay sharply focused on technology. We don’t want to be caught flat-footed as we were in 2008.

And thanks to heavy government support, GM can afford to make those kinds of strategic gambles… although government support has its own hazards as well. For example, GM may be able to build its Volt sales volume to near five-digit numbers… but only as long as it gets a $7k government consumer tax credit which brings the Volt’s effective purchase price into the mid-$30k range. After GM sells 200k Volts, however, that credit will expire and GM will have to sell Volts at MSRP, putting it into the tough situation of having to replicate the BMW Dreier’s high-MSRP, high-volume formula. If GM’s efforts to build production volume brings costs down within those first 200k units, it could then reduce the price of the Volt and potentially have a better chance of keeping sales volume up… on the other hand, if demand remains weak, no supplier is going to jump to reduce costs on a vehicle with little hope for ever achieving mass sales volume. More likely, however, the government will simply re-up the tax credits allowing GM’s plug-in to continue avoiding the market pressures that make EV gambling so tricky.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 60 comments
  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Jan 25, 2011

    The Volt was a terrific first effort by GM. Sure it's not perfect but that doesn't make it a collosal fail. If GM doesn't rest on its laurels, putting as much effort into the gen 2 & 3 Volt as it did with the original, eventually the 120K units a year and profitability will come. Just not in 2012 or 13. Per some of the previous comments, anyone that doesn't think the Volt is an EV is either your typical TTAC GM hater or walking around with they're head up their ash. Most likely both!

    • See 2 previous
    • KixStart KixStart on Jan 25, 2011

      Caroson Fan: "The Volt was a terrific first effort by GM." It's a compact car with a small trunk, mediocre range-extended fuel economy, only 4 seats and it's $41K. If it wasn't for a giant cash gift from Uncle Sam, midwifed by the Michigan Congressional Delegation, it would be almost entirely unsaleable.

  • Panzerfaust Panzerfaust on Jan 26, 2011

    PS: 13,000 U.S. consumers have paid deposits on a Nissan Leaf. Nissan hopes to move 150,000 units a year worldwide. It will cost $26,220.00 after federal rebate, and offers a 100 mile range per charge. This is the competition GM is up against with the Volt. Like it or not it will also be competing against the Ford Fusion Hybrid, the Camry Hybrid, the Nissan Altima Hybrid simply because of the Volt's size and the demographic GM hopes to reach.

  • Dr.Nick What about Infiniti? Some of those cars might be interesting, whereas not much at Nissan interest me other than the Z which is probably big bucks.
  • Dave Holzman My '08 Civic (stick, 159k on the clock) is my favorite car that I've ever owned. If I had to choose between the current Civic and Corolla, I'd test drive 'em (with stick), and see how they felt. But I'd be approaching this choice partial to the Civic. I would not want any sort of automatic transmission, or the turbo engine.
  • Merc190 I would say Civic Si all the way if it still revved to 8300 rpm with no turbo. But nowadays I would pick the Corolla because I think they have a more clear idea on their respective models identity and mission. I also believe Toyota has a higher standard for quality.
  • Dave Holzman I think we're mixing up a few things here. I won't swear to it, but I'd be damned surprised if they were putting fire retardant in the seats of any cars from the '50s, or even the '60s. I can't quite conjure up the new car smell of the '57 Chevy my parents bought on October 17th of that year... but I could do so--vividly--until the last five years or so. I loved that scent, and when I smelled it, I could see the snow on Hollis Street in Cambridge Mass, as one or the other parent got ready to drive me to nursery school, and I could remember staring up at the sky on Christmas Eve, 1957, wondering if I might see Santa Claus flying overhead in his sleigh. No, I don't think the fire retardant on the foam in the seats of 21st (and maybe late 20th) century cars has anything to do with new car smell. (That doesn't mean new car small lacked toxicity--it probably had some.)
  • ToolGuy Is this a website or a podcast with homework? You want me to answer the QOTD before I listen to the podcast? Last time I worked on one of our vehicles (2010 RAV4 2.5L L4) was this past week -- replaced the right front passenger window regulator (only problem turned out to be two loose screws, but went ahead and installed the new part), replaced a bulb in the dash, finally ordered new upper dash finishers (non-OEM) because I cracked one of them ~2 years ago.Looked at the mileage (157K) and scratched my head and proactively ordered plugs, coils, PCV valve, air filter and a spare oil filter, plus a new oil filter housing (for the weirdo cartridge-type filter). Those might go in tomorrow. Is this interesting to you? It ain't that interesting to me. 😉The more intriguing part to me, is I have noticed some 'blowby' (but is it) when the oil filler cap is removed which I don't think was there before. But of course I'm old and forgetful. Is it worth doing a compression test? Leakdown test? Perhaps if a guy were already replacing the plugs...
Next