Washington: Four Cities Consider Red Light Camera Referendum

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Residents in four cities in Washington state may opt for a ballot vote to ban the use of red light cameras and speed cameras. This week activists launched a coordinated effort to place the future of photo enforcement to a vote of the people in Bellingham, Longview, Monroe and Wenatchee. Each local group is following the battle plan established in Mukilteo where 71 percent of voters last year ousted automated enforcement.

In the wake of that overwhelming vote, Monroe Mayor Robert Zimmerman initially promised to hold a public hearing on plans to install speed cameras. He later reneged and went ahead with his plans without consulting public opinion. Ty Balascio, an organizer with the group Seeds of Liberty became determined to bypass the mayor and take the issue directly to the people. Along with statewide coordinators Nicholas Sherwood of BanCams.com, Tim Eyman of Voters Want More Choices and Alex Rion with the Washington chapter of Campaign for Liberty, Balascio hopes to collect 1000 signatures to qualify for the May ballot.

“The city of Monroe and for-profit companies contracted by the city of Monroe may not install or use automatic ticketing cameras to impose fines from camera surveillance unless such a system is approved by a two-thirds vote of the city council and a majority vote of the people at an election,” the proposed initiative states.

The initiative also repeals the existing ordinance authorizing cameras and sets the cost of a citation to that of the least expensive parking ticket. The same language is being offered in Longview by Mike Wallin and Joshua Sutinen who need to secure 2766 signatures. In Bellingham, Johnny Weaver of the Transportation Safety Coalition is seeking 3880. In Wenatchee, Matt Erickson with We The People is looking to line up 2273 signatures.

Each of these local leaders sought help from Eyman, the statewide initiative guru who easily lined up the votes he needed on Election Day in his hometown of Mukilteo. The prospect of having camera programs picked off one by one could stir lawmakers to act on a bill proposed by legislation by state Representative Christopher Hurst (D-Enumclaw) that would require public approval of any new camera programs.

“We want to see if the legislature can do the right thing on their own,” Eyman told TheNewspaper. “I’ve never seen anything to unify the left and right more. Unless you’re a red light camera company or a city official, you just hate these obnoxious automatic ticketing cameras.”

Other cities could see referendum drives or a statewide initiative might be circulated if the legislature fails to act, Eyman suggested.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • CarPerson CarPerson on Jan 29, 2011
    “The traveling public does not need red light cameras to enforce civility at intersections. It needs green and yellow light timing that adheres to sound mathematical and human behavior measurements and judgments. It is the signal lights, not the people, that come up short in cities across the United States.”
  • CarPerson CarPerson on Jan 29, 2011

    Three-second yellows are a nearly-unavoidable non-voter approved transportation tax that hits the most vulnerable the hardest. Cars that pass state safety inspections but cannot stop and cannot get through intersections with the quick yellows should be entrapped and forced to pay $100-$400 from after-tax $11/hr part time wages for a split-second infraction with zero safety impact? Camera tickets are an incredibly regressive tax most often issued in situations having no safety impact. Cameras have a devastating impact on jobs. Pulling $10 million from the local economy to send to Arizona or Australia, with the multiplier effect of money in circulation, has the effect of pulling $50 million out of circulation. This is money that directly keeps people working and puts people back to work. True, honest "Red light running" results in 2% of fatalities. Even if City claims a 25% drop (always proven to be a fabrication) were true, that means the rate is now 1.5%. This is the best they can do with all that money? The FHWA has a free booklet explaining how to get the same and better results for free. Red light cameras have zero effect on this statistic and in fact have consistently been shown to be a counterproductive safety measure. Police officers getting the driver off the road before the crash is the method proven to reduce this figure. The real truth is police officers reduce crashes, deaths and injuries; traffic cameras take pictures of crashes, deaths and injuries.

  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
  • TheEndlessEnigma Poor planning here, dropping a Vinfast dealer in Pensacola FL is just not going to work. I love Pensacola and that part of the Gulf Coast, but that area is by no means an EV adoption demographic.
Next