Canada: City Officials Remain Secretive About Photo Ticket Program

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

A watchdog group last week filed a complaint with Canada’s privacy commissioner and the Manitoba Ombudsman’s Office over the city of Winnipeg’s refusal to release data about its photo enforcement efforts. Over the past five months, WiseUpWinnipeg had filed three separate requests for basic information under under a freedom of information law known as FIPPA, but city officials have refused to comply.

In the US, copies of the contracts under which for-profit red light camera and speed camera operators partner with municipalities are widely available. In August, Winnipeg officials refused to disclose the terms of its arrangement with Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) on the grounds that doing so would “negatively prejudice or harm” the competitive position of ACS and “interfere with future contractual negotiations.” WiseUpWinnipeg wants to see the contract because, according to the city auditor, ACS was effectively handed a sole-source contract.

In September, the Winnipeg Police Service (WPS) denied the group’s request for the “black box” data from red light camera tickets that gives the time, date, location, yellow time, time-into-red and other key information about specific violations. The request was denied on the grounds that “the requested records are in the custody and under the control of ACS Public Sector Solutions Inc… The WPS does not have the ability to retrieve the information.” WiseUpWinnipeg co-founder Todd Dube found that curious because he had previously received copies of tickets from the Manitoba Provincial Court and the 2006 city document laying out the bid requirement for the photo enforcement program stated citation photographs will remain property of the city.

“Our position legally is that ACS is not authorized to control and handle personal information and we will be challenging their authority to possess that information under the Privacy Act,” Dube said in a statement.

Winnipeg has stated it uses mobile photo radar to protect children in so-called playground zones. Officials in November declined to release a list of the zones claiming the records are not available.

“Declaring that playground zone location records do not exist, while they have been enforcing in playground zones, is preposterous,” Dube said. “A specific location code is required to be included in the data/black box display of each violation issued. Clearly, the black box data is the smoking gun that ACS does not want the public to see.”

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Contrarian Contrarian on Dec 09, 2010

    All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent - Thomas Jefferson Even though he wasn't Canadian.

  • Twotone Twotone on Dec 09, 2010

    Time for remotely installed radar/laser detectors and lidar jammers.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next